World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Joost Schymkowitz

Joost Schymkowitz

Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Belgium
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
24711
World Ranking
6169
National Ranking
104

Joost Schymkowitz publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost Schymkowitz sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 237 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Joost Schymkowitz D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost Schymkowitz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

Joost Schymkowitz is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium. Their research spans several fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, along with medicine. Their main areas of study include molecular biology, physiology, materials chemistry, food science, and genetics.

The scientist's contributions focus on topics such as Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, protein structure and dynamics, prion diseases and protein misfolding, enzyme structure and function, proteins in food systems, bacterial genetics and biotechnology, and heat shock proteins research.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Joost Schymkowitz include:

  • Frédéric Rousseau
  • Nikolaos Louros
  • Bert Houben
  • Rob van der Kant
  • Rodrigo Gallardo

They have published extensively in various venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Bioinformatics
  • Food Hydrocolloids
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia

Selected recent papers from Joost Schymkowitz include:

  • Mechanisms and pathology of protein misfolding and aggregation, 2023, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
  • A guide to studying protein aggregation, 2021, FEBS Journal
  • Medin co-aggregates with vascular amyloid-β in Alzheimer's disease, 2022, Nature
  • Structure-based machine-guided mapping of amyloid sequence space reveals uncharted sequence clusters with higher solubilities, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Repurposing the Antidepressant Sertraline as SHMT Inhibitor to Suppress Serine/Glycine Synthesis-Addicted Breast Tumor Growth, 2020, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Best Publications

  • The FoldX web server: an online force field

    Joost Schymkowitz;Jesper Borg;Francois Stricher;Robby Nys

  • Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins

    Ana-Maria Fernandez-Escamilla;Frederic Rousseau;Joost Schymkowitz;Luis Serrano

  • Protein Phase Separation: A New Phase in Cell Biology.

    Steven Boeynaems;Steven Boeynaems;Simon Alberti;Nicolas L. Fawzi;Tanja Mittag

  • Exploring the sequence determinants of amyloid structure using position-specific scoring matrices

    Sebastian Maurer-Stroh;Maja Debulpaep;Maja Debulpaep;Nico Kuemmerer;Manuela Lopez de la Paz

  • Neurotoxicity of Alzheimer's disease Aβ peptides is induced by small changes in the Aβ42 to Aβ40 ratio.

    Inna Kuperstein;Kerensa Broersen;Kerensa Broersen;Iryna Benilova;Iryna Benilova;Iryna Benilova;Jef Rozenski

  • The mechanism of γ-Secretase dysfunction in familial Alzheimer disease

    Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez;Leen Bammens;Iryna Benilova;Annelies Vandersteen;Annelies Vandersteen

  • Phase Separation of C9orf72 Dipeptide Repeats Perturbs Stress Granule Dynamics

    Steven Boeynaems;Elke Bogaert;Denes Kovacs;Albert Konijnenberg

  • Protein aggregation and amyloidosis: confusion of the kinds?

    Frederic Rousseau;Joost Schymkowitz;Luis Serrano

  • Gain of function of mutant p53 by coaggregation with multiple tumor suppressors

    Jie Xu;Joke Reumers;José R Couceiro;Frederik De Smet

  • The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed.

    Nobuhiko Tokuriki;Francois Stricher;Joost Schymkowitz;Luis Serrano

  • A comparative study of the relationship between protein structure and beta-aggregation in globular and intrinsically disordered proteins.

    Rune Linding;Joost Schymkowitz;Frederic Rousseau;Francesca Diella

  • Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field

    Joost W. H. Schymkowitz;Frederic Rousseau;Ivo C. Martins;Jesper Ferkinghoff-Borg

  • Lipids revert inert Aβ amyloid fibrils to neurotoxic protofibrils that affect learning in mice

    Ivo Cristiano Martins;Inna Kuperstein;Hannah Wilkinson;Elke Maes

  • How evolutionary pressure against protein aggregation shaped chaperone specificity

    Frederic Rousseau;Luis Serrano;Joost W.H. Schymkowitz

  • A graphical interface for the FoldX forcefield

    Joost Van Durme;Javier Delgado;Francois Stricher;Luis Serrano

  • The unfolding story of three-dimensional domain swapping.

    Frederic Rousseau;Joost W.H. Schymkowitz;Laura S. Itzhaki

  • Restricted Location of PSEN2/γ-Secretase Determines Substrate Specificity and Generates an Intracellular Aβ Pool

    Ragna Sannerud;Cary Esselens;Paulina Ejsmont;Rafael Mattera

  • SNPeffect 4.0: on-line prediction of molecular and structural effects of protein-coding variants

    Greet De Baets;Joost J. J. van Durme;Joke Reumers;Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

  • Structural Basis for Increased Toxicity of Pathological Aβ42:Aβ40 Ratios in Alzheimer Disease

    Kris Pauwels;Thomas L. Williams;Kyle L. Morris;Wim Jonckheere;Wim Jonckheere

  • Exploring the sequence determinants of amyloid structure using position-specific scoring matrices (vol 7, pg 237, 2010)

    Sebastian Maurer-Stroh;Maja Debulpaep;Nico Kuemmerer;Manuela Lopez de la Paz

Frequent Co-Authors

Luis Serrano
Luis Serrano Centre for Genomic Regulation
Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
Sebastian Maurer-Stroh Agency for Science, Technology and Research
Kris Gevaert
Kris Gevaert Ghent University
Marc Cruts
Marc Cruts University of Antwerp
Peter Tompa
Peter Tompa Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Kristel Sleegers
Kristel Sleegers University of Antwerp
Louise C. Serpell
Louise C. Serpell University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Biology or Biochemistry can open the door to a wide range of healthcare and laboratory careers. Many students choose to specialize further or gain practical skills through online programs tailored to industry needs. For example, if you’re interested in diagnostic imaging, you can explore ultrasound tech programs online, which combine science foundations with technical expertise in medical imaging.

Another growing field is radiologic technology. Those seeking an affordable route into this profession can consider online radiology programs, which often lead to associate degrees and quick entry into hospitals or private clinics.

For students passionate about nutrition and wellness, the best dietetics programs online can provide advanced skills for careers as registered dietitians or nutritionists.

If you prefer working directly with patients, options like an online medical assisting school can prepare you for clinical and administrative roles within medical offices. Exploring these pathways ensures you find a biology-related career that matches your interests and strengths.

Best Scientists Citing Joost Schymkowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles