World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 69 6104 5538 1101 1088 214 20964
Environmental Sciences 70 1662 1581 166 164 222 21145

Daohui Lin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daohui Lin between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daohui Lin published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2023. 39 of the 317 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2023. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 38 publications 2023: 40 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 38 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

317 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daohui Lin: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 4
2011 3
2012 10
2013 7
2014 10
2015 7
2016 14
2017 8
2018 16
2019 16
2020 16
2021 38
2022 38
2023 40
2024 36
2025 38
2026 1
Total 317
Download as CSV

Daohui Lin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daohui Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 222 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263 222
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Daohui Lin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daohui Lin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94 70
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Daohui Lin is affiliated with Zhejiang University in China and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans various subfields, including Pollution, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, and Water Science and Technology.

The main topics that characterize Daohui Lin's work are:

  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Pharmaceutical and antibiotic environmental impacts
  • Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Microplastics and plastic pollution
  • Toxic organic pollutants impact
  • Advanced photocatalysis techniques
  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal

They have published many papers in frequently appearing journals such as:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Environmental Pollution

Notable recent publications include:

  • "A new strategy using nanoscale zero-valent iron to simultaneously promote remediation and safe crop production in contaminated soil" (2020, Nature Nanotechnology)
  • "The complexation with proteins in extracellular polymeric substances alleviates the toxicity of Cd (II) to Chlorella vulgaris" (2020, Environmental Pollution)
  • "Intrinsic defects enhanced biochar/peroxydisulfate oxidation capacity through electron-transfer regime" (2022, Chemical Engineering Journal)
  • "Construction of dual active sites on diatomic metal (FeCo−N/C-x) catalysts for enhanced Fenton-like catalysis" (2022, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental)
  • "Biochar effectively inhibits the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes via transformation" (2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials)

Their collaborations involve frequent coauthors including Kun Yang, Jiang Xu, Jie Hou, and Wenhao Wu.

Best Publications

  • Phytotoxicity of nanoparticles: Inhibition of seed germination and root growth

    Daohui Lin;Baoshan Xing

  • Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles.

    Daohui Lin;Baoshan Xing

  • Toxicity of ZnO Nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: Mechanism and the Influence of Medium Components

    Mei Li;Lizhong Zhu;Daohui Lin

  • ADSORPTION OF PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS BY CARBON NANOTUBES: ROLE OF AROMATICITY AND SUBSTITUTION OF HYDROXYL GROUPS

    Daohui Lin;Baoshan Xing

  • Adsorption and Hysteresis of Bisphenol A and 17α-Ethinyl Estradiol on Carbon Nanomaterials

    Bo Pan;Daohui Lin;Hamid Mashayekhi;Baoshan Xing

  • Interactions of humic acid with nanosized inorganic oxides.

    Kun Yang;Daohui Lin;Baoshan Xing

  • Multifunctional iron-biochar composites for the removal of potentially toxic elements, inherent cations, and hetero-chloride from hydraulic fracturing wastewater.

    Yuqing Sun;Yuqing Sun;Iris K.M. Yu;Daniel C.W. Tsang;Xinde Cao

  • Toxicity of oxide nanoparticles to the green algae Chlorella sp.

    Jing Ji;Zhifeng Long;Daohui Lin

  • Fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment.

    Daohui Lin;Xiaoli Tian;Fengchang Wu;Baoshan Xing

  • Adsorption of volatile organic compounds by metal-organic frameworks MIL-101: influence of molecular size and shape.

    Kun Yang;Qian Sun;Feng Xue;Daohui Lin

  • Tannic acid adsorption and its role for stabilizing carbon nanotube suspensions.

    Daohui Lin;Baoshan Xing

  • Environmental transformations and ecological effects of iron-based nanoparticles.

    Cheng Lei;Yuqing Sun;Daniel C.W. Tsang;Daohui Lin

  • Nanoparticle interactions with co-existing contaminants: joint toxicity, bioaccumulation and risk.

    Rui Deng;Daohui Lin;Lizhong Zhu;Sanghamitra Majumdar

  • The influence of dissolved and surface-bound humic acid on the toxicity of TiO₂ nanoparticles to Chlorella sp.

    Daohui Lin;Jing Ji;Zhifeng Long;Kun Yang

  • Effects of water chemistry on the dissolution of ZnO nanoparticles and their toxicity to Escherichia coli.

    Mei Li;Daohui Lin;Lizhong Zhu

  • Systematic and Quantitative Investigation of the Mechanism of Carbon Nanotubes’ Toxicity toward Algae

    Zhifeng Long;Jing Ji;Kun Yang;Daohui Lin

  • Toxicity of iron-based nanoparticles to green algae: Effects of particle size, crystal phase, oxidation state and environmental aging.

    Cheng Lei;Luqing Zhang;Kun Yang;Lizhong Zhu

  • A new strategy using nanoscale zero-valent iron to simultaneously promote remediation and safe crop production in contaminated soil

    Yangzhi Liu;Ting Wu;Jason C. White;Daohui Lin

  • Toxicity of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid to Escherichia coli: Membrane disruption, oxidative stress, and DNA damage induced cell inactivation and/or death

    Gesheng Liu;Shuai Zhang;Kun Yang;Lizhong Zhu

  • Concentrations and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tea.

    Unknown

  • The effect of ionic strength and pH on the stability of tannic acid-facilitated carbon nanotube suspensions

    Daohui Lin;Daohui Lin;Ni Liu;Kun Yang;Kun Yang;Lizhong Zhu

  • Heteroagglomeration of oxide nanoparticles with algal cells: effects of particle type, ionic strength and pH.

    Si Ma;Kaijun Zhou;Kun Yang;Daohui Lin

Frequent Co-Authors

Kun Yang
Kun Yang Zhejiang University
Baoshan Xing
Baoshan Xing University of Massachusetts Amherst
Youji Wang
Youji Wang Shanghai Ocean University
Menghong Hu
Menghong Hu Shanghai Ocean University
Lizhong Zhu
Lizhong Zhu Zhejiang University
Fengchang Wu
Fengchang Wu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Daniel C.W. Tsang
Daniel C.W. Tsang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Jason C. White
Jason C. White Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station
Xiangdong Li
Xiangdong Li Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Yong Sik Ok
Yong Sik Ok Korea University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career options and skill sets. For instance, pursuing dsw programs offers pathways into social work fields that often intersect with environmental justice and community health.

If you prefer a broader approach, some students start with best affordable online general studies degree programs. These flexible courses allow you to tailor your studies toward environmental policy, sustainability, or resource management, providing a strong foundation for diverse roles.

For those seeking a quicker route, identifying what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help balance time and educational goals, especially if transitioning careers or managing work alongside studies.

Additionally, specialized fields like geology are closely linked to Environmental Sciences. Many students benefit from exploring online geology programs, which provide critical knowledge about Earth systems essential for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Daohui Lin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles