World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 61 3632 3319 139 124 224 16320

Rufin VanRullen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rufin VanRullen between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rufin VanRullen published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2010. 24 of the 281 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2010. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 14 publications
1999 2025

281 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rufin VanRullen: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 2
2003 5
2004 5
2005 8
2006 3
2007 8
2008 3
2009 4
2010 26
2011 19
2012 8
2013 7
2014 10
2015 15
2016 16
2017 17
2018 9
2019 16
2020 20
2021 20
2022 15
2023 17
2024 10
2025 14
Total 281
Download as CSV

Rufin VanRullen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rufin VanRullen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 218–227 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 224 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242 224
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Rufin VanRullen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rufin VanRullen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328 61
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Rufin VanRullen is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research spans significant fields including neuroscience and computer science, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and biophysics.

The scientist's work covers major topics such as neural dynamics and brain function, visual perception and processing mechanisms, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, visual attention and saliency detection, neural and behavioral psychology studies, cell image analysis techniques, and face recognition and perception.

Rufin VanRullen has published extensively, with frequent contributions to venues like arXiv (Cornell University), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, eLife, and Neural Networks.

Recent papers by or involving Rufin VanRullen include:

  • Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Deep learning and the Global Workspace Theory (2021), published in Trends in Neurosciences
  • Natural scene reconstruction from fMRI signals using generative latent diffusion (2023), published in Scientific Reports
  • Prefrontal attentional saccades explore space rhythmically (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • DMT alters cortical travelling waves (2020), published in eLife

Frequent coauthors collaborating with VanRullen include Andrea Alamia, Leila Reddy, Bhavin Choksi, Milad Mozafari, and T. Serre.

Best Publications

  • The phase of ongoing EEG oscillations predicts visual perception

    Niko Busch;Julien Dubois;Rufin VanRullen

  • Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention

    Fei Fei Li;Rufin VanRullen;Christof Koch;Pietro Perona

  • The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making

    Rufin Vanrullen;Simon J. Thorpe

  • Is perception discrete or continuous

    Rufin VanRullen;Christof Koch

  • Perceptual Cycles

    Unknown

  • Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention

    Niko A. Busch;Rufin VanRullen

  • Spike times make sense.

    Rufin VanRullen;Rudy Guyonneau;Simon J. Thorpe

  • An oscillatory mechanism for prioritizing salient unattended stimuli

    Ole Jensen;Mathilde Bonnefond;Rufin VanRullen;Rufin VanRullen

  • Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorisation of natural and artifactual objects.

    Rufin VanRullen;Simon J Thorpe

  • The Phase of Ongoing Oscillations Mediates the Causal Relation between Brain Excitation and Visual Perception

    Laura Dugué;Philippe Marque;Rufin VanRullen

  • Surfing a spike wave down the ventral stream.

    Rufin VanRullen;Simon J Thorpe

  • The blinking spotlight of attention.

    Rufin VanRullen;Thomas Carlson;Thomas Carlson;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Ongoing EEG Phase as a Trial-by-Trial Predictor of Perceptual and Attentional Variability.

    Rufin VanRullen;Niko Busch;Niko Busch;Jan Drewes;Julien Dubois;Julien Dubois

  • Four Common Conceptual Fallacies in Mapping the Time Course of Recognition

    Rufin Vanrullen;Rufin Vanrullen

  • Alpha oscillations and traveling waves: Signatures of predictive coding?

    Andrea Alamia;Rufin VanRullen

  • On second glance: still no high-level pop-out effect for faces.

    Rufin VanRullen

  • Neurons Tune to the Earliest Spikes Through STDP

    Rudy Guyonneau;Rufin Vanrullen;Simon J. Thorpe

  • On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition

    Rufin VanRullen;Benedikt Zoefel;Benedikt Zoefel;Barkin Ilhan

  • Perceptual Echoes at 10 Hz in the Human Brain

    Rufin VanRullen;Rufin VanRullen;James S.P. Macdonald

  • Visual Selective Behavior Can Be Triggered by a Feed-Forward Process

    Rufin Vanrullen;Christof Koch

  • Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli

    Fei-Fei Li;Rufin VanRullen;Christof Koch;Pietro Perona

Frequent Co-Authors

Christof Koch
Christof Koch Allen Institute for Brain Science
Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University
Niko A. Busch
Niko A. Busch University of Münster
Simon J. Thorpe
Simon J. Thorpe Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Thomas Serre
Thomas Serre Brown University
Thomas A. Carlson
Thomas A. Carlson University of Sydney
Pietro Perona
Pietro Perona California Institute of Technology
Robin L. Carhart-Harris
Robin L. Carhart-Harris University of California, San Francisco
Ryota Kanai
Ryota Kanai University of Sussex
Suliann Ben Hamed
Suliann Ben Hamed Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience studies in the USA often opens doors to a range of online degrees and flexible career pathways. For those looking to advance directly into clinical psychology or counseling, enrolling in an online psyd program provides both theoretical knowledge and practical skills, all accessible remotely.

If your interests align more with family therapy and relationships, you might consider an mft online option, which delivers specialized training and can help fast-track your career.

For broader foundations, earning an online bachelor's degree is a flexible way to start your neuroscience journey or switch to interdisciplinary roles. These programs often allow for faster completion, catering to students who are eager to join the workforce.

Lastly, choosing top-tier pathways can help ensure strong financial outcomes. Pursuing one of the highest paying degrees in the world—especially in related fields like biomedical sciences, informatics, or engineering—can set you up for long-term career growth and stability.

Best Scientists Citing Rufin VanRullen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles