World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nicolas Papernot

Nicolas Papernot

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
53
Citations
30133
World Ranking
239
National Ranking
10

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
31933
World Ranking
4423
National Ranking
175

Nicolas Papernot publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Papernot sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nicolas Papernot D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Papernot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Nicolas Papernot is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence and privacy-preserving technologies. Their work spans several subfields, including computer vision and pattern recognition, signal processing, hardware and architecture, and computer networks and communications.

Their research topics cover a variety of areas such as adversarial robustness in machine learning, privacy-preserving technologies in data, anomaly detection techniques and applications, advanced malware detection techniques, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), stochastic gradient optimization techniques, and advanced neural network applications.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data," 2024, published in Nature
  • "Public code for Model Collapse," 2024, published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Label-Only Membership Inference Attacks," 2020, published on arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacy," 2021, published in the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Bad Characters: Imperceptible NLP Attacks," 2022, published at the 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)

Their frequent coauthors include Ilia Shumailov, Adam Dziedzic, Anvith Thudi, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, and Franziska Boenisch.

They have published frequently in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Nature, Nature Communications, and the SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick McDaniel;Somesh Jha;Matt Fredrikson

  • Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick McDaniel;Ian Goodfellow;Somesh Jha

  • Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural Networks

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick McDaniel;Xi Wu;Somesh Jha

  • Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses

    Florian Tramèr;Alexey Kurakin;Nicolas Papernot;Ian J. Goodfellow

  • MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning

    David Berthelot;Nicholas Carlini;Ian Goodfellow;Nicolas Papernot

  • Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samples

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick D. McDaniel;Ian J. Goodfellow

  • On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness

    Nicholas Carlini;Anish Athalye;Nicolas Papernot;Wieland Brendel

  • Towards the Science of Security and Privacy in Machine Learning

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick D. McDaniel;Arunesh Sinha;Michael P. Wellman

  • On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examples

    Kathrin Grosse;Praveen Manoharan;Nicolas Papernot;Michael Backes

  • Adversarial Attacks on Neural Network Policies

    Sandy H. Huang;Nicolas Papernot;Ian J. Goodfellow;Yan Duan

  • Technical Report on the CleverHans v2.1.0 Adversarial Examples Library

    Nicolas Papernot;Fartash Faghri;Nicholas Carlini;Ian Goodfellow

  • The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examples

    Florian Tramèr;Nicolas Papernot;Ian J. Goodfellow;Dan Boneh

  • Adversarial examples for malware detection

    Kathrin Grosse;Nicolas Papernot;Praveen Manoharan;Michael Backes

  • Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Data

    Nicolas Papernot;Martín Abadi;Úlfar Erlingsson;Ian J. Goodfellow

  • Machine Unlearning

    Lucas Bourtoule;Varun Chandrasekaran;Christopher A. Choquette-Choo;Hengrui Jia

  • Practical Black-Box Attacks against Deep Learning Systems using Adversarial Examples.

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick D. McDaniel;Ian J. Goodfellow;Somesh Jha

  • Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learning

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick D. McDaniel

  • AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data

    Unknown

  • Crafting adversarial input sequences for recurrent neural networks

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick McDaniel;Ananthram Swami;Richard Harang

  • Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural Networks for Malware Classification

    Kathrin Grosse;Nicolas Papernot;Praveen Manoharan;Michael Backes

  • SoK: Security and Privacy in Machine Learning

    Nicolas Papernot;Patrick McDaniel;Arunesh Sinha;Michael P. Wellman

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ian Goodfellow
Ian Goodfellow Google (United States)
Nicholas Carlini
Nicholas Carlini Google (United States)
Ananthram Swami
Ananthram Swami United States Army Research Laboratory
Somesh Jha
Somesh Jha University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson University of Cambridge
Dan Boneh
Dan Boneh Stanford University
Kunal Talwar
Kunal Talwar Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in computer science doesn’t have to mean stepping away from work or relocating. Today, a variety of flexible online degrees offer pathways to in-demand tech careers and advanced opportunities.

For those interested in business and management within tech fields, investigating the cheapest online mba programs can provide valuable leadership skills while keeping costs manageable. Alternatively, many professionals are aiming to accelerate their credentials by enrolling in an online masters that can be completed in just one year—ideal for quickly boosting your qualifications.

If your goal is to quickly secure a well-paying tech job, there are degrees you can get online that pay well, including options in information technology, cybersecurity, and more. For those passionate about future-facing fields, exploring an online ai degree program prepares you for roles in artificial intelligence and machine learning—some of the fastest-growing areas in tech.

Whether you’re looking to specialize further or diversify your skills, these affordable and flexible online options can help you achieve your career goals in the evolving landscape of computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolas Papernot

Trending Scientists