World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
7070
World Ranking
9697
National Ranking
23

Michael Winikoff publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Winikoff sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 208 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Winikoff D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Winikoff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Winikoff is affiliated with Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand and has contributed primarily to the field of computer science, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence and multi-agent systems. Their work spans several subfields including artificial intelligence, information systems and management, human-computer interaction, safety, risk, reliability and quality, and management information systems.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas such as:

  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction

Michael Winikoff has published frequently in venues that include:

  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Life

Some recent papers authored by the scientist include:

  • "Why bad coffee? Explaining BDI agent behaviour with valuings," 2021, published in Artificial Intelligence
  • "The Advent of Digital Productivity Assistants: The Case of Microsoft MyAnalytics," 2021, published in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

They have also shared authorship with frequent collaborators such as Viviana Mascardi, Г. А. Сидоренко, Frank Dignum, Michael Fisher, and Kristin Yvonne Rozier.

Their scholarly contributions include books published with Springer Science+Business Media, with titles such as:

  • Explainable and Transparent AI and Multi-Agent Systems (2021)
  • Engineering Multi-Agent Systems (2020 and 2022 editions)

Best Publications

  • Developing Intelligent Agent Systems: A Practical Guide

    Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • Prometheus: a methodology for developing intelligent agents

    Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • JACK intelligent agents: an industrial strength platform

    Michael Winikoff

  • Comparing agent-oriented methodologies

    Khanh Hoa Dam;Michael Winikoff

  • Declarative and procedural goals in intelligent agent systems

    Michael Winikoff;Lin Padgham;James Harland;John Thangarajah

  • Prometheus: a methodology for developing intelligent agents

    Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • Agent-oriented Information Systems IV

    Manuel Kolp;Paolo Bresciani;Brian Hendersen-Sellers;Michael Winikoff

  • Detecting & avoiding interference between goals in intelligent agents

    John Thangarajah;Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • Debugging multi-agent systems using design artifacts: the case of interaction protocols

    David Poutakidis;Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • Prometheus: A Pragmatic Methodology for Engineering Intelligent Agents

    Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • Goals in agent systems: a unifying framework

    M. Birna van Riemsdijk;Mehdi Dastani;Michael Winikoff

  • Implementing commitment-based interactions

    Michael Winikoff

  • Simplifying the Development of Intelligent Agents

    Michael Winikoff;Lin Padgham;James Harland

  • Tool support for agent development using the Prometheus methodology

    L. Padgham;John Thangarajah;M. Winikoff

  • Prometheus: a practical agent oriented methodology

    Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • Detecting & exploiting positive goal interaction in intelligent agents

    John Thangarajah;Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

  • Adding debugging support to the Prometheus methodology

    Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff;David Poutakidis

  • Enhancing commitment machines

    Michael Winikoff;Wei Liu;James Harland

  • Programming in Lygon: An Overview

    James Harland;David J. Pym;Michael Winikoff

  • Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems

    Kate Larson;Michael Winikoff;Sanmay Das;Edmund Durfee

  • Prometheus design tool

    John Thangarajah;Lin Padgham;Michael Winikoff

Frequent Co-Authors

Lin Padgham
Lin Padgham RMIT University
Frank Dignum
Frank Dignum Umeå University
Brian Henderson-Sellers
Brian Henderson-Sellers University of Technology Sydney
Mehdi Dastani
Mehdi Dastani Utrecht University
Tim Miller
Tim Miller University of Queensland
Virginia Dignum
Virginia Dignum Umeå University
Zahir Tari
Zahir Tari RMIT University
Michael Fisher
Michael Fisher University of Manchester
Danny Weyns
Danny Weyns KU Leuven
Alessandro Ricci
Alessandro Ricci University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education offers flexibility and accessibility for those interested in technology and beyond. For students looking to minimize expenses, the cheapest bachelor degree programs can provide a solid foundation in computer science without the high price tag.

If your interests lean toward a more specialized or technical field, consider the cheapest online engineering degree options. These programs combine rigorous training with cost-effectiveness, preparing graduates for diverse roles in engineering and technology.

For those seeking leadership or management positions, executive mba programs online offer flexibility for working professionals aiming to elevate their careers. An executive MBA often opens doors to higher-level executive and strategic roles within the tech industry and beyond.

Alternatively, if you are interested in information management or digital resources, pursuing a master library science online could be the right fit. This degree is especially valuable for careers in data curation, digital librarianship, and information technology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Winikoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles