World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7046
World Ranking
9285
National Ranking
166

Koen V. Hindriks publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Koen V. Hindriks sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 257 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Koen V. Hindriks D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Koen V. Hindriks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Koen V. Hindriks is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans various areas within computer science and psychology, with a focus on artificial intelligence and social psychology.

The main fields of study for Koen V. Hindriks include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

Within these fields, their work addresses several subfields:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Social Psychology
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Safety Research
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Key topics covered in Hindriks' research are:

  • Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Robotics and Automated Systems
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Koen V. Hindriks has published research in various venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI
  • 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction

Recent papers published by Hindriks demonstrate a range of interests within artificial intelligence and social interaction fields. Notable publications include:

  • "A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence" (2020, Computer)
  • "Automatic Emotion Recognition for Groups: A Review" (2021, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing)
  • "Empowering vulnerable target groups with serious games and gamification" (2021, Entertainment Computing)
  • "Agent programming in the cognitive era" (2020, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems)
  • "Emotion contagion in agent-based simulations of crowds: a systematic review" (2022, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems)

Frequent co-authors working with Koen V. Hindriks are:

  • Mike E.U. Ligthart
  • Mark A. Neerincx
  • Florian Kunneman
  • Charlotte Gerritsen
  • Kim Baraka

Best Publications

  • Agent Programming in 3APL

    Koen V. Hindriks;Frank S. De Boer;Wiebe Van Der Hoek;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • A Research Agenda for Hybrid Intelligence: Augmenting Human Intellect With Collaborative, Adaptive, Responsible, and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

    Zeynep Akata;Dan Balliet;Maarten de Rijke;Frank Dignum

  • Programming Rational Agents in GOAL

    Koen V. Hindriks

  • Opponent modelling in automated multi-issue negotiation using Bayesian learning

    Koen Hindriks;Dmytro Tykhonov

  • GENIUS: AN INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENT FOR SUPPORTING THE DESIGN OF GENERIC AUTOMATED NEGOTIATORS

    Raz Lin;Sarit Kraus;Sarit Kraus;Tim Baarslag;Dmytro Tykhonov

  • Agent Programming with Declarative Goals

    Koen V. Hindriks;Frank S. de Boer;Wiebe van der Hoek;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Evaluating practical negotiating agents: Results and analysis of the 2011 international competition

    Tim Baarslag;Katsuhide Fujita;Enrico H. Gerding;Koen Hindriks

  • Learning about the opponent in automated bilateral negotiation: a comprehensive survey of opponent modeling techniques

    Tim Baarslag;Mark J. Hendrikx;Koen V. Hindriks;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • Computational Modeling of Emotion: Toward Improving the Inter- and Intradisciplinary Exchange

    Rainer Reisenzein;Eva Hudlicka;Mehdi Dastani;Jonathan Gratch

  • The first automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2010)

    Katsuhide Fujita;Reyhan Aydoğan;Tim Baarslag;Koen Hindriks

  • Formal Semantics for an Abstract Agent Programming Language

    Koen V. Hindriks;Frank S. de Boer;Wiebe van der Hoek;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Alternating Offers Protocols for Multilateral Negotiation

    Reyhan Aydoğan;Reyhan Aydoğan;David Festen;Koen V. Hindriks;Catholijn M. Jonker

  • Formal semantics for an abstract agent programming language

    K. V. Hindriks;F. S. De Boer;W. Van Der Hoek;J.-J. C. Meyer

  • Do you get it? user-evaluated explainable BDI agents

    Joost Broekens;Maaike Harbers;Koen Hindriks;Karel Van Den Bosch

  • TRADR Project: Long-Term Human-Robot Teaming for Robot Assisted Disaster Response

    Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová;Francis Colas;Mario Gianni;Fiora Pirri

  • A verification framework for agent programming with declarative goals

    F.S. de Boer;F.S. de Boer;K.V. Hindriks;W. van der Hoek;J.-J.Ch. Meyer

  • Towards an environment interface standard for agent platforms

    Tristan M. Behrens;Koen V. Hindriks;Jürgen Dix

  • Accepting optimally in automated negotiation with incomplete information

    Tim Baarslag;Koen V. Hindriks

  • Specification and Verification of Multi-agent Systems

    Mehdi Dastani;Koen V. Hindriks;John-Jules Charles Meyer

  • Agent programming languages: programming with mental models

    K.V. Hindriks

  • Agent Programming with Declarative Goals

    F.S. de Boer;K.V. Hindriks;W. van der Hoek;J.-J.Ch. Meyer

  • ECAI 2000 - Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    K. Hindriks;M. d'Inverno;Michael Luck

Frequent Co-Authors

Catholijn M. Jonker
Catholijn M. Jonker Delft University of Technology
Mark A. Neerincx
Mark A. Neerincx Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Wiebe van der Hoek
Wiebe van der Hoek University of Liverpool
John-Jules Ch. Meyer
John-Jules Ch. Meyer Utrecht University
Sarit Kraus
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
Mehdi Dastani
Mehdi Dastani Utrecht University
Jan Treur
Jan Treur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert
Marcel G. M. Olde Rikkert Radboud University
Michael Fisher
Michael Fisher University of Manchester
Robert Babuska
Robert Babuska Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your Computer Science studies through online programs can open new doors. Many students consider adjacent fields such as online physics degrees for a broader scientific foundation. These degrees often provide flexible schedules and can be suitable for those balancing education with work.

Data science is another popular pathway. If you’re interested in analytics or AI, you might want to explore what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to find cost-effective options for upskilling.

Engineering-focused careers are also accessible online. You can compare programs using resources like the online electrical engineering degree ranking to find high-quality and reputable courses.

If you are seeking credentials that can boost your employability quickly, check out easy licenses and certifications to get for roles in tech that require less time investment but still offer strong earning potential.

Exploring these related options can help you find the right fit for your career goals in technology and science.

Best Scientists Citing Koen V. Hindriks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles