What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Artificial intelligence
- Programming language
- Software
Koen V. Hindriks focuses on Artificial intelligence, Programming language, Programming paradigm, Human–computer interaction and Inductive programming.
Koen V. Hindriks has included themes like Bidding and Mathematical optimization in his Artificial intelligence study.
His Programming language study which covers 3APL that intersects with Belief–desire–intention software model.
His studies in Human–computer interaction integrate themes in fields like GOAL agent programming language, Graphical user interface, Pareto principle and Interface.
His study in Inductive programming focuses on Functional logic programming, Programming domain and Procedural programming.
His Programming domain study combines topics in areas such as Programming language theory, Symbolic programming and Reactive programming.
His most cited work include:
- Agent Programming in 3APL (361 citations)
- Programming Rational Agents in GOAL (165 citations)
- Agent Programming with Declarative Goals (148 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Artificial intelligence, Human–computer interaction, Robot, Programming language and Knowledge management are his primary areas of study.
His studies deal with areas such as Adversary and Machine learning as well as Artificial intelligence.
His Human–computer interaction study frequently draws connections between related disciplines such as Interface.
He combines subjects such as Task and Set with his study of Robot.
His study in Programming paradigm, Inductive programming, Functional logic programming, Logic programming and Programming language theory falls under the purview of Programming language.
His Functional logic programming study frequently links to related topics such as Programming domain.
He most often published in these fields:
- Artificial intelligence (26.61%)
- Human–computer interaction (19.76%)
- Robot (17.34%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Robot (17.34%)
- Human–computer interaction (19.76%)
- Social robot (10.89%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Robot, Human–computer interaction, Social robot, Human–robot interaction and Task.
His research on Robot concerns the broader Artificial intelligence.
His Human–computer interaction research incorporates elements of State, End user, Benchmark, Interaction design pattern and Intelligent decision support system.
His work carried out in the field of Social robot brings together such families of science as Prom, User studies and Gesture.
His Human–robot interaction study incorporates themes from Humanoid robot, Embodied cognition, Nonverbal communication and Process management.
His Task research includes elements of Dialogue management and Cognitive psychology.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Alternating Offers Protocols for Multilateral Negotiation (37 citations)
- Personalised self-explanation by robots: The role of goals versus beliefs in robot-action explanation for children and adults (23 citations)
- Engineering Multi-Agent Systems: State of Affairs and the Road Ahead (19 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Artificial intelligence
- Programming language
- Software
Koen V. Hindriks spends much of his time researching Robot, Social robot, Intelligent agent, Human–computer interaction and Prom.
His Robot research integrates issues from Management science and Process management.
His Intelligent agent research includes themes of Mobile agent, Cognitive psychology and Source code.
His work carried out in the field of Human–computer interaction brings together such families of science as Isolation, Agent architecture, State and Service.
Koen V. Hindriks combines topics linked to Artificial intelligence with his work on Set.
He works in the field of Artificial intelligence, namely Humanoid robot.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
