World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
35
Citations
5635
World Ranking
2761
National Ranking
1131

Lou van den Dries publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lou van den Dries sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 170 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Lou van den Dries D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lou van den Dries sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lou van den Dries is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on mathematics, with 27 publications contributing to this field. Within mathematics, their work spans several subfields, including applied mathematics, geometry and topology, computational theory and mathematics, mathematical physics, and finance.

Their research topics encompass various advanced areas such as:

  • Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research
  • Advanced Topology and Set Theory
  • Meromorphic and Entire Functions
  • Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
  • Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
  • Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory

Lou van den Dries has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed journals and venues throughout their career. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society
  • Notices of the American Mathematical Society
  • Expositiones Mathematicae
  • Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lou van den Dries include:

  • "Revisiting closed asymptotic couples," 2022, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society
  • "Transseries, Model Theory, and Hardy Fields," 2022, Notices of the American Mathematical Society
  • "On the Pila-Wilkie theorem," 2022, Expositiones Mathematicae
  • "On a differential intermediate value property," 2022, Revista de la Unión Matemática Argentina
  • "Revisiting closed asymptotic couples," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Collaboration has been a significant part of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Matthias Aschenbrenner
  • Joris van der Hoeven
  • Neer Bhardwaj

Best Publications

  • Geometric categories and o-minimal structures

    Lou van den Dries;Chris Miller

  • P-adic and real subanalytic sets

    J. Denef;L. van den Dries

  • The Elementary Theory of Restricted Analytic Fields with Exponentiation

    Lou van den Dries;Angus Macintyre;David Marker

  • Gromov's theorem on groups of polynomial growth and elementary logic

    Unknown

  • On the real exponential field with restricted analytic functions

    Lou van den Dries;Chris Miller

  • A generalization of the Tarski-Seidenberg theorem, and some nondefinability results

    Lou van den Dries

  • THE REAL FIELD WITH CONVERGENT GENERALIZED POWER SERIES

    Lou van den Dries;Patrick Speissegger;Patrick Speissegger

  • T -convexity and tame extensions

    Lou van den Dries;Adam H. Lewenberg

  • On the real exponential field with restricted analytic functions

    Unknown

  • Dense pairs of o-minimal structures

    Lou van den Dries

  • Definable sets over finite fields

    Zoé Chatzidakis;Lou van den Dries;Angus Macintyre

  • Bounds in the theory of polynomial rings over fields. A nonstandard approach

    Unknown

  • Dimension of definable sets, algebraic boundedness and Henselian fields

    Lou Van den Dries

  • Logarithmic-Exponential Power Series

    Lou van den Dries;Angus Macintyre;David Marker

  • The field of reals with multisummable series and the exponential function

    Lou Van Den Dries;Patrick Speissegger

  • Remarks on Tarski's problem concerning (R, +, *, exp)

    Lou van den Dries

  • Asymptotic Differential Algebra and Model Theory of Transseries

    Matthias Aschenbrenner;Lou van den Dries;Joris van der Hoeven

  • ONE-DIMENSIONAL p -ADIC SUBANALYTIC SETS

    Lou van den Dries;Deirdre Haskell;Dugald MacPherson

  • Alfred Tarski's elimination theory for real closed fields

    Lou van den Dries

  • Logarithmic-exponential series

    Lou van den Dries;Angus Macintyre;David Marker

  • THE FIELDS OF REAL AND COMPLEX NUMBERS WITH A SMALL MULTIPLICATIVE GROUP

    Lou Van Den Dries;Ayhan Günaydin

  • Elimination of Quantifiers in Algebraic Structures

    Angus Macintyre;Kenneth McKenna;Lou van den Dries

  • Algebraic theories with definable Skolem functions

    Lou van den Dries

Frequent Co-Authors

Angus Macintyre
Angus Macintyre Queen Mary University of London
Anand Pillay
Anand Pillay University of Notre Dame
Michael F. Singer
Michael F. Singer North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many aspiring professionals consider complementing their math background with business-focused programs. For instance, 12 month mba programs offer an accelerated route to gain essential management skills that are highly valued across industries.

Additionally, flexibility is crucial for those who want to switch or advance their studies without losing prior credits. If transferring between programs is a concern, resources on can you transfer mba programs provide valuable guidance on navigating credit transfer policies effectively.

For math graduates interested in data, pursuing a data analytics masters programs can be a natural extension. These programs blend mathematical theories with practical analytics tools, preparing students for high-demand roles in tech, finance, and healthcare.

Lastly, those new to advanced studies might explore options that balance rigor with accessibility. Understanding what mba programs can i get into helps prospective students find achievable pathways that fit their academic profile and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lou van den Dries

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles