World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
5626
World Ranking
7328
National Ranking
165

Patricia Bouyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Bouyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 197 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patricia Bouyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia Bouyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patricia Bouyer is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research is primarily situated in the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions across various subfields including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Management Science and Operations Research, and Hardware and Architecture.

Their work extensively covers topics related to Formal Methods in Verification, Game Theory and Applications, Petri Nets in System Modeling, Logic, programming, and type systems, Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, as well as Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques.

Selected recent publications reflect a range of research interests and include:

  • Games Where You Can Play Optimally with Arena-Independent Finite Memory (2022) published in Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • Diagnosing timed automata using timed markings (2021) published in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • Characterizing Omega-Regularity through Finite-Memory Determinacy of Games on Infinite Graphs (2023) published in TheoretiCS
  • Games on Graphs: From Logic and Automata to Algorithms (2023) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Reasoning about Quality and Fuzziness of Strategic Behaviors (2023) published in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Among frequent coauthors are Mickaël Randour, Pierre Vandenhove, Nathalie Bertrand, Stéphane Le Roux, and Youssouf Oualhadj, indicating collaborative efforts in the research community particularly focused on theoretical computer science topics.

Publication venues where Patricia Bouyer has published multiple works include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Information and Computation

Their research portfolio shows a consistent emphasis on the theory and applications of games, formal verification methods, and logic as tools for understanding computational systems and algorithms. The diversity of publication venues and collaborations underlines the interdisciplinary nature of this work.

Best Publications

  • Optimal strategies in priced timed game automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Franck Cassez;Emmanuel Fleury;Kim G. Larsen

  • Infinite Runs in Weighted Timed Automata with Energy Constraints

    Patricia Bouyer;Uli Fahrenberg;Kim G. Larsen;Nicolas Markey

  • Lower and upper bounds in zone-based abstractions of timed automata

    Gerd Behrmann;Patricia Bouyer;Kim G. Larsen;Radek Pelánek

  • Improved undecidability results on weighted timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Thomas Brihaye;Nicolas Markey

  • Forward Analysis of Updatable Timed Automata

    Patricia Bouyer

  • Updatable timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Catherine Dufourd;Emmanuel Fleury;Antoine Petit

  • Fault diagnosis using timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Fabrice Chevalier;Deepak D'Souza

  • Static guard analysis in timed automata verification

    Gerd Behrmann;Patricia Bouyer;Emmanuel Fleury;Kim G. Larsen

  • The power of reachability testing for timed automata

    Luca Aceto;Patricia Bouyer;Augusto Burgueño;Kim G. Larsen

  • On the optimal reachability problem of weighted timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Thomas Brihaye;Véronique Bruyère;Jean-François Raskin

  • Timed control with partial observability

    Patricia Bouyer;Deepak D'souza;P. Madhusudan;Antoine Petit

  • On the expressiveness of TPTL and MTL

    Patricia Bouyer;Fabrice Chevalier;Nicolas Markey

  • Staying Alive as Cheaply as Possible

    Patricia Bouyer;Ed Brinksma;Kim Guldstrand Larsen

  • Optimal infinite scheduling for multi-priced timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Ed Brinksma;Kim G. Larsen

  • Are timed automata updatable

    P. Bouyer;C. Dufourd;E. Fleury;A. Petit

  • Untameable timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer

  • An algebraic approach to data languages and timed languages

    Patricia Bouyer;Antoine Petit;Denis Thérien

  • Robust model-checking of linear-time properties in timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Nicolas Markey;Pierre-Alain Reynier

  • Untameable timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Catherine Dufourd;Emmanuel Fleury;Antoine Petit

  • Quantitative analysis of real-time systems using priced timed automata

    Patricia Bouyer;Uli Fahrenberg;Kim G. Larsen;Nicolas Markey

  • Lower and Upper Bounds in Zone Based Abstractions of Timed Automata

    Gerd Behrmann;Patricia Bouyer;Kim Guldstrand Larsen;Radek Pelánek

  • Timed control with partial observability

    Patricia Bouyer;Deepak D'Souza;Madhusudan Parthasarathy;Antoine Petit

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicolas Markey
Nicolas Markey French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Kim Guldstrand Larsen
Kim Guldstrand Larsen Aalborg University
Serge Haddad
Serge Haddad École Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay
Joël Ouaknine
Joël Ouaknine Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
James Worrell
James Worrell University of Oxford
Christel Baier
Christel Baier TU Dresden
Eugene Asarin
Eugene Asarin Université Paris Cité
Orna Kupferman
Orna Kupferman Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Luca Aceto
Luca Aceto Reykjavík University
Jean-François Raskin
Jean-François Raskin Université Libre de Bruxelles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in the USA opens up a range of flexible and affordable options for students interested in computer science and related fields. For those starting their journey, reviewing the best associates degrees to get can help identify practical, entry-level pathways to build foundational skills.

If you want to advance your expertise or boost your career prospects, consider pursuing affordable master's degrees online in computer science or a related discipline. These programs often offer competitive tuition rates and flexible study schedules.

For professionals aiming for leadership or specialized academic roles, doctoral degrees are a major step forward. Options such as the online PhD in organizational leadership or the cheapest accredited online doctoral programs provide in-depth knowledge and open doors to top-tier positions in academia, research, or management.

No matter your starting point or ultimate goal, there are accessible online degrees and career pathways to suit every ambition and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia Bouyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles