World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 35 11460 11134 347 346 205 8717

Tim Miller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tim Miller between 1963 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tim Miller published across 63 years, from 1963 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2014. 25 of the 367 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2014. 1963: 2 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 4 publications 1966: 7 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 4 publications 1969: 1 publication 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
1963 2025

367 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tim Miller: publications per year, 1963 to 2025
Year Publications
1963 2
1964 1
1965 4
1966 7
1967 1
1968 4
1969 1
1970 3
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 2
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 4
2004 4
2005 8
2006 6
2007 6
2008 6
2009 6
2010 7
2011 10
2012 6
2013 26
2014 45
2015 25
2016 17
2017 18
2018 17
2019 15
2020 24
2021 26
2022 10
2023 18
2024 14
2025 11
Total 367
Download as CSV

Tim Miller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 205 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508 205
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Tim Miller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim Miller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 35
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tim Miller is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on Artificial Intelligence. Over the course of their career, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Safety Research, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work covers a range of main topics, including Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Machine Learning in Healthcare, AI-based Problem Solving and Planning, and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge.

Notable recent publications by Tim Miller include:

  • "Explainable artificial intelligence models using real-world electronic health record data: a systematic scoping review," 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Good Proctor or "Big Brother"? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies," 2021, Philosophy & Technology
  • "Contrastive explanation: a structural-model approach," 2021, The Knowledge Engineering Review
  • "Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Tim Miller frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Liz Sonenberg, Ronal Singh, Eduardo Velloso, Henrietta Lyons, and Frank Vetere. Their cooperative work has resulted in multiple joint publications.

Key publication venues where Tim Miller's work has appeared most often include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
  • Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

Best Publications

  • Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences

    Tim Miller

  • XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence

    David Gunning;Mark Stefik;Jaesik Choi;Timothy Miller

  • IARPA Janus Benchmark - C: Face Dataset and Protocol

    Brianna Maze;Jocelyn Adams;James A. Duncan;Nathan Kalka

  • Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI

    Alon Jacovi;Ana Marasović;Tim Miller;Yoav Goldberg

  • IARPA Janus Benchmark-B Face Dataset

    Cameron Whitelam;Emma Taborsky;Austin Blanton;Brianna Maze

  • Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences

    Tim Miller

  • Explainable artificial intelligence models using real-world electronic health record data: a systematic scoping review.

    Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri;Zhaoyi Chen;Pablo Rengifo-Moreno;Pablo Rengifo-Moreno;Tim Miller

  • Explainable Reinforcement Learning through a Causal Lens

    Prashan Madumal;Tim Miller;Liz Sonenberg;Frank Vetere

  • Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciences.

    Tim Miller;Piers Howe;Liz Sonenberg

  • Comparing 2D vector field visualization methods: a user study

    D.H. Laidlaw;R.M. Kirby;C.D. Jackson;J.S. Davidson

  • Contrastive explanation: A structural-model approach

    Tim Miller

  • Contrastive Explanation: A Structural-Model Approach

    Tim Miller

  • Good Proctor or "Big Brother"? Ethics of Online Exam Supervision Technologies.

    Simon Coghlan;Tim Miller;Jeannie Paterson

  • Planning over multi-agent epistemic states: a classical planning approach

    Christian Muise;Vaishak Belle;Paolo Felli;Sheila McIlraith

  • Emotion-led modelling for people-oriented requirements engineering

    Tim Miller;Sonja Pedell;Antonio A. Lopez-Lorca;Antonette Mendoza

  • The design of 3D haptic widgets

    Timothy Miller;Robert Zeleznik

  • GestureBar: improving the approachability of gesture-based interfaces

    Andrew Bragdon;Robert Zeleznik;Brian Williamson;Timothy Miller

  • Electronic ink system

    Joseph LaViola;Robert Zeleznik;Timothy Miller;Loring Holden

  • Broad-Coverage Parsing Using Human-Like Memory Constraints

    Unknown

  • Crossing the agent technology chasm: Lessons, experiences and challenges in commercial applications of agents

    Steve Munroe;Tim Miller;Roxana A. Belecheanu;Michal Pěchouček

  • Model-Based Test Oracle Generation for Automated Unit Testing of Agent Systems

    L. Padgham;Zhiyong Zhang;J. Thangarajah;T. Miller

  • Requirements Elicitation and Specification Using the Agent Paradigm: The Case Study of an Aircraft Turnaround Simulator

    Tim Miller;Bin Lu;Leon Sterling;Ghassan Beydoun

  • Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic Decisions

    Henrietta Lyons;Eduardo Velloso;Tim Miller

  • Using Dependency Structures for Prioritization of Functional Test Suites

    Shifa-e-Zehra Haidry;T. Miller

  • A Grounded Interaction Protocol for Explainable Artificial Intelligence

    Prashan Madumal;Tim Miller;Liz Sonenberg;Frank Vetere

  • Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI

    Alon Jacovi;Ana Marasović;Tim Miller;Yoav Goldberg

  • Distilling Deep Reinforcement Learning Policies in Soft Decision Trees

    Youri Coppens;Kyriakos Efthymiadis;Tom Lenaerts;Ann Nowé

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald Lee
Ronald Lee University of California, Berkeley
Leon Sterling
Leon Sterling Swinburne University of Technology
Frank Vetere
Frank Vetere University of Melbourne
Robert C. Zeleznik
Robert C. Zeleznik Brown University
Peter McBurney
Peter McBurney King's College London
Joseph J. LaViola
Joseph J. LaViola University of Central Florida
Eduardo Velloso
Eduardo Velloso University of Melbourne
Steve Howard
Steve Howard University of Melbourne
Ghassan Beydoun
Ghassan Beydoun University of Technology Sydney
Michael Winikoff
Michael Winikoff Victoria University of Wellington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up numerous pathways for online study and lucrative careers. Students interested in expanding their skills can consider pursuing an online master’s in electrical engineering degree. This program blends technical expertise and innovation, making graduates highly sought-after in various industries.

For those looking to quickly enhance employability, there are easy certifications that pay well. These certifications often require less time than traditional degrees and can offer immediate returns in the job market.

If your goal is to advance your career efficiently, look into the shortest master degree programs, which allow you to earn your credentials in less time while still gaining essential industry knowledge.

For long-term value and career stability, many professionals seek out the most valuable masters degrees aligned with market trends. Choosing the right path can significantly impact your success in the fast-evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Tim Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles