World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5245
World Ranking
13496
National Ranking
401

Steve Howard publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Howard sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 115 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Steve Howard D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Howard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve Howard was affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia during their academic career. Their research spanned multiple fields, primarily within Computer Science, with significant contributions to Information Systems and Human-Computer Interaction. Additionally, their work intersected with Sociology and Political Science, and focused areas such as Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change.

Their scholarly output included exploration of topics centered on Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Marine and fisheries research, and Mobile Health and mHealth Applications. They also contributed to understanding Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, ICT in Developing Communities, as well as African studies and sociopolitical and cultural issues related to the African continent.

Steve Howard coauthored research with several frequent collaborators, including Gwyn E. Jones, Mary Bawn, Rosi Dagit, Michael T. Booth, and Mauricio Gómez. These partnerships contributed to work published across diverse venues, indicating a multidisciplinary approach to their research.

The publication venues in which they appeared included:

  • California Fish and Wildlife Journal
  • Companion animal
  • AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) (Association for Information Systems)
  • Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines
  • The Veterinary Nurse

Among their recent papers were:

  • "Occurrences of Steelhead Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in southern California, 1994-2018," 2020, California Fish and Wildlife Journal
  • "Consumer health ICT and the patient in the middle: Adopter and/or influencer?," 2024, AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) (Association for Information Systems)
  • "Cross-sectoral alliance formed to promote the responsible use of veterinary medicines," 2022, Companion animal
  • "Religion, Media, and Marginality in Modern Africa," 2021, Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines
  • "Cross-sectoral alliance formed to promote the responsible use of veterinary medicines," 2022, The Veterinary Nurse

Their work addressed diverse thematic concerns such as ecological occurrences of fish species, health information and communication technologies relating to patient roles, responsible veterinary medicine practices, and socio-religious marginality in African contexts.

Best Publications

  • Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships

    Frank Vetere;Martin R. Gibbs;Jesper Kjeldskov;Steve Howard

  • The ebb and flow of online learning

    Jon M. Pearce;Mary D. Ainley;Steve Howard

  • Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people

    J. Carroll;S. Howard;F. Vetere;J. Peck

  • Methods & tools: the rich picture: a tool for reasoning about work context

    Andrew Monk;Steve Howard

  • A systematic examination of the use of Online social networking sites for sexual health promotion

    Judy Gold;Judy Gold;Alisa Edith Pedrana;Alisa Edith Pedrana;Rachel Sacks-Davis;Rachel Sacks-Davis;Margaret Elena Hellard;Margaret Elena Hellard;Margaret Elena Hellard

  • A Field Study of Perceptions and Use of Mobile Telephones by 16 to 22 Year Olds

    Jennie Carroll;Steve Howard;Jane Peck;John Murphy

  • Hug over a distance

    Florian 'Floyd' Mueller;Frank Vetere;Martin R. Gibbs;Jesper Kjeldskov

  • Human-Computer Interaction: INTERACT '97

    Steve Howard;Judy Hammond;Gitte Lindgaard

  • The Magic Box and Collage: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play

    Frank Vetere;Hilary Davis;Martin Gibbs;Steve Howard

  • Evaluating the usability of a mobile guide: the influence of location, participants and resources

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Connor Graham;Sonja Pedell;Frank Vetere

  • Developing Health Promotion Interventions on Social Networking Sites: Recommendations from The FaceSpace Project

    Judy Gold;Alisa Edith Pedrana;Mark Stoove;Shanton Chang

  • IDENTITY, POWER AND FRAGMENTATION IN CYBERSPACE: TECHNOLOGY APPROPRIATION BY YOUNG PEOPLE

    Jennie Carroll;Steve Howard;Frank Vetere;Jane Peck

  • Randomness as a resource for design

    Tuck Wah Leong;Frank Vetere;Steve Howard

  • Queer as F**k: reaching and engaging gay men in sexual health promotion through social networking sites.

    Alisa Edith Pedrana;Margaret Elena Hellard;Judy Gold;Nadine Ata

  • Using Cultural Probes to Explore Mediated Intimacy

    Jesper Kjeldskov;Martin R. Gibbs;Frank Vetere;Steve Howard

  • Heuristic Evaluation and Mobile Usability: Bridging the Realism Gap

    Shirlina Po;Steve Howard;Frank Vetere;Mikael B. Skov

  • Using 'endowed props' in scenario-based design

    Steve Howard;Jennie Carroll;John Murphy;Jane Peck

  • Being online, living offline: the influence of social ties over the appropriation of social network sites

    Bernd Ploderer;Steve Howard;Peter Thomas

  • Sexual Health Promotion on Social Networking Sites: A Process Evaluation of the FaceSpace Project

    Phuong Nguyen;Judy Gold;Judy Gold;Alisa Edith Pedrana;Alisa Edith Pedrana;Shanton Chang

  • Putting Yourself in the Picture: An Evaluation of Virtual Model Technology as an Online Shopping Tool

    Stephen P. Smith;Robert B. Johnston;Steve Howard

  • Engineering the social: The role of shared artifacts

    Jeni Paay;Leon Sterling;Frank Vetere;Steve Howard

  • The serendipity shuffle

    Tuck W Leong;Frank Vetere;Steve Howard

  • Collaboration on Social Network Sites: Amateurs, Professionals and Celebrities

    Bernd Ploderer;Steve Howard;Peter Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Vetere
Frank Vetere University of Melbourne
Martin Gibbs
Martin Gibbs University of Melbourne
Jesper Kjeldskov
Jesper Kjeldskov Monash University
Leon Sterling
Leon Sterling Swinburne University of Technology
Graeme Shanks
Graeme Shanks University of Melbourne
Margaret Hellard
Margaret Hellard Burnet Institute
Tim Miller
Tim Miller University of Queensland
Ron Borland
Ron Borland University of Melbourne
Mark Stoove
Mark Stoove Burnet Institute
Peter Wright
Peter Wright Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in related fields can offer flexibility, affordability, and new avenues for your career. Computer Science majors often find overlaps in engineering, environmental science, and physics, making it wise to consider a diverse array of online programs.

If you’re looking to accelerate your education, the fastest computer science degree programs online can help you graduate sooner and enter the workforce more quickly. Students interested in sustainable innovation may also consider the cheapest online environmental science degree programs, which combine technology and environmental awareness.

Engineering remains a top choice for problem-solvers and technical thinkers. To minimize tuition costs, look into the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree programs that deliver robust training at a lower price. If your interests lean towards scientific theory and discovery, the best online physics degree can open career doors in research, data science, and beyond.

Comparing these pathways ensures you find an online degree that aligns with your interests, budget, and career aspirations in the broad field of computer science and its connected disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Steve Howard

Recently Published Articles