World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4728 4375 128 115 234 7914

Falk Huettig publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Falk Huettig between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Falk Huettig published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 11 of the 249 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
2004 2025

249 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Falk Huettig: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 5
2010 9
2011 12
2012 23
2013 26
2014 24
2015 20
2016 21
2017 13
2018 18
2019 17
2020 6
2021 23
2022 6
2023 5
2024 6
2025 5
Total 249
Download as CSV

Falk Huettig publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Falk Huettig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 234–243 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 234 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170 234
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Falk Huettig D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Falk Huettig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Falk Huettig is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany and has a research focus spanning psychology and neuroscience. Their work predominantly engages with developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology, alongside contributions to artificial intelligence and social psychology. Their research integrates multiple areas related to language processing, literacy, and cognitive development.

The scientist's main topics of study include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Categorization, Perception, and Language
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Falk Huettig's recent papers demonstrate a consistent engagement with language and cognitive science communities. Notable publications include:

  • "A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)" (2021) in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "A parallel architecture perspective on pre-activation and prediction in language processing" (2022) in Cognition
  • "Literacy can enhance syntactic prediction in spoken language processing." (2021) in Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Does Neuronal Recycling Result in Destructive Competition? The Influence of Learning to Read on the Recognition of Faces" (2021) in Psychological Science
  • "The role of the written script in shaping mirror-image discrimination: Evidence from illiterate, Tamil literate, and Tamil-Latin-alphabet bi-literate adults" (2020) in Cognition

Frequent publication venues for Huettig include:

  • Cognition
  • Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
  • Brain Research
  • Cognitive Science
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Collaborations have involved several frequent co-authors, reflecting interdisciplinary and sustained research partnerships. These co-authors include:

  • Markus Ostarek
  • M. Arunkumar
  • Figen Karaca
  • Susanne Brouwer
  • Sharon Unsworth

Falk Huettig's publication record includes over sixty-four works in psychology and more than thirty-three in neuroscience, underscoring a substantial contribution to these fields. Their research often intersects with language acquisition, literacy development, and cognitive mechanisms underlying perception and categorization.

Best Publications

  • Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation.

    Falk Huettig;Joost Rommers;Joost Rommers;Antje S. Meyer;Antje S. Meyer

  • Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm

    Falk Huettig;Gerry T. M. Altmann

  • Prediction During Language Processing is a Piece of Cake — But Only for Skilled Producers

    Nivedita Mani;Falk Huettig

  • The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search

    Falk Huettig;James M. McQueen

  • Four central questions about prediction in language processing

    Falk Huettig

  • Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Stephen Politzer-Ahles;Stephen Politzer-Ahles;Evelien Heyselaar;Katrien Segaert

  • Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world

    Falk Huettig;Esther Janse

  • Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not.

    Falk Huettig;Nivedita Mani

  • Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Dale J. Barr;Federica Bartolozzi;Federica Bartolozzi;Simon Busch-Moreno

  • Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye- movements are modulated by reading ability - Evidence from Indian low and high literates

    Ramesh K. Mishra;Niharika Singh;Aparna Pandey;Falk Huettig

  • Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms

    Falk Huettig;Christian N. L. Olivers;Robert J. Hartsuiker

  • Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness

    Falk Huettig;Gerry T. M. Altmann

  • The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to.

    Joost Rommers;Antje S. Meyer;Antje S. Meyer;Peter Praamstra;Falk Huettig

  • Looking at anything that is green when hearing “frog”: How object surface colour and stored object colour knowledge influence language-mediated overt attention

    Falk Huettig;Gerry T. M. Altmann

  • Listening to yourself is like listening to others: External, but not internal, verbal self-monitoring is based on speech perception

    Falk Huettig;Robert J. Hartsuiker

  • When meaning matters: The temporal dynamics of semantic influences on visual attention

    Floor De Groot;Falk Huettig;Christian N. L. Olivers

  • Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world.

    Falk Huettig;Philip T. Quinlan;Scott A. McDonald;Gerry T. M. Altmann

  • A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE)

    Richard D. Morey;Michael P. Kaschak;Antonio M. Díez-Álamo;Antonio M. Díez-Álamo;Arthur M. Glenberg;Arthur M. Glenberg

  • Distinguishing cause from effect – many deficits associated with developmental dyslexia may be a consequence of reduced and suboptimal reading experience

    Falk Huettig;Thomas Lachmann;Alexandra Reis;Karl Magnus Petersson;Karl Magnus Petersson

  • Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized

    James M. McQueen;Falk Huettig

  • Literacy advantages beyond reading. Prediction of spoken language

    Falk Huettig;Falk Huettig;Martin J. Pickering

  • Author response: Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension

    Mante S Nieuwland;Mante S Nieuwland;Stephen Politzer-Ahles;Stephen Politzer-Ahles;Evelien Heyselaar;Katrien Segaert

Frequent Co-Authors

Padraic Monaghan
Padraic Monaghan Lancaster University
Christian N. L. Olivers
Christian N. L. Olivers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Mante S. Nieuwland
Mante S. Nieuwland Max Planck Society
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Robert J. Hartsuiker
Robert J. Hartsuiker Ghent University
Thomas Lachmann
Thomas Lachmann Technical University of Kaiserslautern
Gerry T. M. Altmann
Gerry T. M. Altmann University of Connecticut
David I. Donaldson
David I. Donaldson University of Stirling
Asifa Majid
Asifa Majid University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a wide range of rewarding careers in fields such as social work, counseling, and psychology. Today, there are many flexible online degree options that allow students to earn qualifications more efficiently and affordably.

For students looking to fast-track their education, consider an accelerated msw program online or an accelerated psychology degree. These programs can lead to licensure and career advancement in as little as one to two years.

If you are interested in becoming a licensed counselor, choosing a cacrep-accredited program is essential. CACREP accreditation ensures your degree meets high industry standards and can facilitate licensure requirements in many states.

Those passionate about helping families and couples can pursue online marriage and family therapy graduate programs. These programs prepare graduates for specialized therapy roles with flexible study options for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Falk Huettig

Trending Scientists