World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
23396
World Ranking
6888
National Ranking
3175

Jerry S. Lanchbury publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerry S. Lanchbury sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 258 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jerry S. Lanchbury D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerry S. Lanchbury sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jerry S. Lanchbury is affiliated with Myriad in the United States and has a research focus situated primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with additional work in medicine. Their scholarly output spans multiple subfields including genetics, oncology, cancer research, molecular biology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their published research addresses a range of topics, with notable emphasis on BRCA gene mutations in cancer, nutrition, genetics, and disease, PARP inhibition in cancer therapy, genetic associations and epidemiology, DNA repair mechanisms, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, as well as cancer genomics and diagnostics.

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • Association of a Polygenic Risk Score With Breast Cancer Among Women Carriers of High- and Moderate-Risk Breast Cancer Genes, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score in germline BRCA2- versus ATM-altered prostate cancer, 2021, Modern Pathology
  • Development and Validation of a Clinical Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Breast Cancer Risk, 2020, JCO Precision Oncology
  • Modification of Homologous Recombination Deficiency Score Threshold and Association with Long-Term Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, 2021, Cancers
  • Performance of the IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick model of breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity in the Women's Health Initiative, 2021, Cancer

Frequent co-authorship includes collaborations with Alexander Gutin, Elisha Hughes, Susanne Wagner, Allison W. Kurian, and Susan M. Domchek, reflecting sustained research partnerships across multiple projects.

Lanchbury's work is often published in established scientific journals, with multiple contributions to the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research, JCO Precision Oncology, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, and Clinical Cancer Research. These venues highlight a focus on clinical and translational cancer research alongside genetic and molecular studies.

Best Publications

  • The genome of the domesticated apple ( Malus × domestica Borkh.)

    Riccardo Velasco;Andrey Zharkikh;Jason Affourtit;Amit Dhingra

  • A High Quality Draft Consensus Sequence of the Genome of a Heterozygous Grapevine Variety

    Riccardo Velasco;Andrey Zharkikh;Michela Troggio;Dustin A. Cartwright

  • Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

    Melinda L. Telli;Kirsten M. Timms;Julia Reid;Bryan Hennessy

  • Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study.

    Jack Cuzick;Gregory P Swanson;Gabrielle Fisher;Arthur R Brothman

  • Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: The TNT Trial

    Andrew Tutt;Andrew Tutt;Holly Tovey;Maggie Chon U Cheang;Sarah Kernaghan

  • Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer

    Victor Abkevich;Kirsten Timms;Bryan T. Hennessy;Jennifer Potter

  • The importance of the t cell in initiating and maintaining the chronic synovitis of rheumatoid arthritis

    G. S. Panayi;J. S. Lanchbury;G. H. Kingsley

  • Incidence and Outcome of BRCA Mutations in Unselected Patients with Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

    Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo;Kirsten M. Timms;Shuying Liu;Huiqin Chen

  • SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISMS AND THE FUTURE OF GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY

    Nicholas J Schork;Daniele Fallin;Jerry S Lanchbury

  • Tumor necrosis factor combines with IL-4 or IFN-gamma to selectively enhance endothelial cell adhesiveness for T cells. The contribution of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1-dependent and -independent binding mechanisms.

    M. H. Thornhill;S. M. Wellicome;D. L. Mahiouz;J. S. S. Lanchbury

  • Sequence variants in the genes for the interleukin-23 receptor (IL23R) and its ligand (IL12B) confer protection against psoriasis

    Francesca Capon;Paola Di Meglio;Joanna Szaub;Natalie J. Prescott

  • HLA-DR4 subtype frequencies in rheumatoid arthritis indicate that DRB1 is the major susceptibility locus within the HLA class II region.

    B. P. Wordsworth;J. S. S. Lanchbury;L. I. Sakkas;K. I. Welsh

  • Somatic Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Could Expand the Number of Patients That Benefit From Poly (ADP Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer

    Bryan T.J. Hennessy;Kirsten M. Timms;Mark S. Carey;Alexander Gutin

  • A monoclonal antibody that detects a novel antigen on endothelial cells that is induced by tumor necrosis factor, IL-1, or lipopolysaccharide.

    S M Wellicome;M H Thornhill;C Pitzalis;D S Thomas

  • PTEN, PIK3CA, p-AKT, and p-p70S6K status: association with trastuzumab response and survival in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

    Francisco J. Esteva;Hua Guo;Hua Guo;Siyuan Zhang;Cesar Santa-Maria

  • Interleukin-10 promoter polymorphisms in Southern Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

    Chi Chiu Mok;Jerry S. Lanchbury;David Wai Chan;Chak Sing Lau

  • Meta‐analysis of genome searches

    L. H. Wise;J. S. Lanchbury;C. M. Lewis

  • Influence of vitamin D receptor genotype on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a twin study in Britain

    T D Spector;R W Keen;N K Arden;N A Morrison

  • HLA heterozygosity contributes to susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis.

    P. Wordsworth;K. D. Pile;J. D. Buckely;J. S. S. Lanchbury

  • Identification of ZNF313/RNF114 as a novel psoriasis susceptibility gene

    Francesca Capon;Marie José Bijlmakers;Natalie Wolf;Maria Quaranta

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriel S. Panayi
Gabriel S. Panayi King's College London
Tim D. Spector
Tim D. Spector King's College London
Robert Vaughan
Robert Vaughan Guy's Hospital
Cathryn M. Lewis
Cathryn M. Lewis King's College London
Ronald E. Bontrop
Ronald E. Bontrop Utrecht University
Costantino Pitzalis
Costantino Pitzalis Queen Mary University of London
Jack Cuzick
Jack Cuzick Queen Mary University of London
William E R Ollier
William E R Ollier University of Manchester
Jane Worthington
Jane Worthington University of Manchester
Leah Gerber
Leah Gerber Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates in Biology and Biochemistry often pursue specialized roles at the intersection of science and healthcare data management. One growing field is health information management, which you can study flexibly through a him degree online. These programs prepare you for careers that blend biology, technology, and administration.

Another in-demand pathway is medical coding and billing. If you’re interested in certification, it's important to understand the differences between a cpc certification and other credentials, as each can impact your career trajectory, costs, and salary potential.

The earning outlook for these roles is strong; explore more about medical.coding salary to see potential incomes and advancement opportunities. Additionally, consider both the advantages and the realities of this career path by reading about the job outlook for medical billing and coding.

These online degrees and certifications offer practical options for biology graduates seeking stable, rewarding roles in healthcare information fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jerry S. Lanchbury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles