World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
33809
World Ranking
5380
National Ranking
1966

Charles L. Redman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Redman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 112 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Charles L. Redman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Redman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1972 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Charles L. Redman is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a total of thirteen publications in this field. Subfields explored include health, toxicology and mutagenesis; global and planetary change; environmental engineering; sociology and political science; and archeology.

The scientist's work covers several significant topics, including climate change and health impacts, urban heat island mitigation, urban green space and health, flood risk assessment and management, disaster management and resilience, building energy and comfort optimization, and noise effects and management.

Notable recent papers by Charles L. Redman include:

  • "Coupled human and natural systems: The evolution and applications of an integrated framework," 2021, published in AMBIO
  • "Building community heat action plans story by story: A three neighborhood case study," 2020, published in Cities
  • "Evidence of alliesthesia during a neighborhood thermal walk in a hot and dry city," 2022, published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Adaptive capacity to extreme urban heat: The dynamics of differing narratives," 2022, published in Climate Risk Management
  • "Public transit infrastructure and heat perceptions in hot and dry climates," 2021, published in International Journal of Biometeorology

Charles L. Redman frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • David M. Hondula
  • Melissa Guardaro
  • Nancy B. Grimm
  • Yuliya Dzyuban
  • Paul Coseo

Frequent publication venues for their work include AMBIO, Cities, The Science of The Total Environment, Climate Risk Management, and International Journal of Biometeorology.

Among the recognitions received, Charles L. Redman was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1972.

Best Publications

  • Global Change and the Ecology of Cities

    Nancy B. Grimm;Stanley H. Faeth;Nancy E. Golubiewski;Charles L. Redman

  • Complexity of coupled human and natural systems

    Jianguo Liu;Thomas Dietz;Stephen R. Carpenter;Marina Alberti

  • Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development

    Arnim Wiek;Lauren Withycombe;Charles L. Redman

  • Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems

    Nancy B. Grimm;J. Morgan Grove;Steward T.A. Pickett;Charles L. Redman

  • Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences, and solutions

    Graeme S. Cumming;David H. M. Cumming;Charles L. Redman

  • Integrated Approaches to Long-TermStudies of Urban Ecological Systems

    Nancy B. Grimm;J. Morgan Grove;Steward T. A. Pickett;Charles L. Redman

  • Coupled Human and Natural Systems

    Jianguo Liu;Thomas Dietz;Stephen R. Carpenter;Carl Folke

  • Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity

    Diane Hope;Corinna Gries;Weixing Zhu;William F. Fagan

  • Human Impact on Ancient Environments

    Charles L. Redman

  • Integrating Social Science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network: Social Dimensions of Ecological Change and Ecological Dimensions of Social Change

    Charles L. Redman;J. Morgan Grove;Lauren H. Kuby

  • Urban Transitions: On Urban Resilience and Human-Dominated Ecosystems

    Henrik Ernstson;Sander E. Van Der Leeuw;Charles L. Redman;Douglas J. Meffert

  • Real‐world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world

    Katja Brundiers;Arnim Wiek;Charles L. Redman

  • Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research

    Thaddeus R. Miller;Timothy D. Baird;Caitlin M. Littlefield;Gary P. Kofinas

  • Sustainability or Collapse: What Can We Learn from Integrating the History of Humans and the Rest of Nature?

    Robert Costanza;Lisa J. Graumlich;Will Steffen;Carole L Crumley

  • Resilience of past landscapes: Resilience theory, society, and the Longue Durée

    Charles L. Redman;Ann P. Kinzig

  • The rise of civilization: From early farmers to urban society in the ancient Near East

    Charles L. Redman

  • Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits

    Charles L. Redman

  • Resilience Theory in Archaeology

    Charles L. Redman

  • Quantifying spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization: The case of the two fastest growing metropolitan regions in the United States

    Jianguo Wu;Jianguo Wu;G. Darrel Jenerette;Alexander Buyantuyev;Alexander Buyantuyev;Charles L. Redman

  • From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the Socioeconomic Dimension of Long-term Socioecological Research

    Helmut Haberl;Verena Winiwarter;Krister Andersson;Robert U. Ayres

  • Human Impact on Ancient Environments

    Harriet Blitzer;Charles L. Redman

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy B. Grimm
Nancy B. Grimm Arizona State University
Ann P. Kinzig
Ann P. Kinzig Arizona State University
Marina Alberti
Marina Alberti University of Washington
Mikhail Chester
Mikhail Chester Arizona State University
Jianguo Liu
Jianguo Liu Michigan State University
Carl Folke
Carl Folke Stockholm University
Steward T. A. Pickett
Steward T. A. Pickett Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Robert Costanza
Robert Costanza University College London
Diane Hope
Diane Hope Arizona State University
Jane Lubchenco
Jane Lubchenco Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about environmental sciences, expanding your education through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. A specialized focus on spatial data analysis can elevate your expertise, and pursuing one of the best GIS programs offers training in Geographic Information Systems essential for environmental mapping and resource management.

If you're interested in leadership roles that integrate public policy and environmental stewardship, exploring the best online MPA programs provides efficient pathways to earn a Master of Public Administration. These programs prepare graduates to manage environmental projects within government or nonprofit sectors effectively.

Environmental challenges are deeply connected with social behavior and community dynamics. Online degrees like the best online bachelor degree in sociology help build understanding of societal influences on environmental policy and advocacy.

Educators seeking advanced credentials can consider progressive programs such as online EdD programs no dissertation. These pathways support professionals aiming for leadership positions in environmental education without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Best Scientists Citing Charles L. Redman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles