World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 35 9216 3303 52 10280

Diane Hope publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diane Hope between 1975 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diane Hope published across 48 years, from 1975 to 2022, averaging 1.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2004. 1 of the 57 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2004. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1975 2022

57 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diane Hope: publications per year, 1975 to 2022
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 2
1996 1
1997 3
1998 0
1999 2
2000 1
2001 6
2002 2
2003 6
2004 8
2005 4
2006 8
2007 2
2008 5
2009 1
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 57
Download as CSV

Diane Hope publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Hope sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 51–60 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 52 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62 52
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Diane Hope D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane Hope sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163 35
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Diane Hope is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their academic profile indicates a focus on research and scholarly activities associated with this institution.

While there is no detailed information available regarding their specific research papers, co-authors, or publication venues, the affiliation with a major research university suggests active involvement in academic research.

No data is available on the scientist's main or subfields of study, nor on the topics of their work. Likewise, there are no records of book publications or awards attributed to Diane Hope at this time.

The absence of recent publications or other recorded academic outputs in the available data indicates either a limited publication record or that such information has not been captured in this dataset.

As the record shows no indication of their passing, Diane Hope is presumed to be currently active or at least alive.

Best Publications

  • From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology.

    Eyal Shochat;Eyal Shochat;Paige S. Warren;Paige S. Warren;Stanley H. Faeth;Nancy E. McIntyre

  • Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity

    Diane Hope;Corinna Gries;Weixing Zhu;William F. Fagan

  • A review of the export of carbon in river water: fluxes and processes.

    D. Hope;M.F. Billett;M.S. Cresser

  • A New Urban Ecology

    James P. Collins;Ann Kinzig;Nancy B. Grimm;William F. Fagan

  • The Effects of Human Socioeconomic Status and Cultural Characteristics on Urban Patterns of Biodiversity

    Ann P. Kinzig;Paige Warren;Chris Martin;Diane Hope

  • Nitrogen Emissions, Deposition, and Monitoring in the Western United States

    Mark E. Fenn;Richard Haeuber;Gail S. Tonnesen;Jill S. Baron

  • Bonding and Bridging: Understanding the Relationship between Social Capital and Civic Action

    Larissa Larsen;Sharon L. Harlan;Bob Bolin;Edward J. Hackett

  • Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences

    Nancy E. McIntyre;K. Knowles-Yánez;D. Hope

  • Nitrogen Balance for the Central Arizona–Phoenix (CAP) Ecosystem

    Lawrence A. Baker;Diane Hope;Ying Xu;Jennifer Edmonds

  • Linking land-atmosphere-stream carbon fluxes in a lowland peatland system

    M. F. Billett;S. M. Palmer;S. M. Palmer;D. Hope;D. Hope;C. Deacon

  • The relationship between dissolved organic carbon in stream water and soil organic carbon pools at different spatial scales

    J. A. Aitkenhead;D. Hope;M. F. Billett

  • Carbon dioxide and methane evasion from a temperate peatland stream

    Diane Hope;Sheila M. Palmer;Michael F. Billett;Julian J. C. Dawson

  • EXPORTS OF ORGANIC CARBON IN BRITISH RIVERS

    Diane Hope;Michael F. Billett;Ronnie Milne;Thomas A. W. Brown

  • Sources of organic and inorganic carbon in a headwater stream: Evidence from carbon isotope studies

    Sheila M. Palmer;Diane Hope;Michael F. Billett;Julian J.C. Dawson

  • Variations in dissolved CO2 and CH4 in a first‐order stream and catchment: an investigation of soil–stream linkages

    Diane Hope;Diane Hope;Sheila M. Palmer;Michael F. Billett;Julian J. C. Dawson

  • Exports of organic carbon in two river systems in NE Scotland

    Diane Hope;Michael F. Billett;Malcolm S. Cresser

  • Sources and sinks of aquatic carbon in a peatland stream continuum

    Julian J.C. Dawson;Michael F. Billett;Diane Hope;Sheila M. Palmer

  • National inventories of terrestrial carbon sources and sinks : The U.K. experience

    M. G. R. Cannell;R. Milne;K. J. Hargreaves;T. A. W. Brown

  • Connecting organic carbon in stream water and soils in a peatland catchment

    Michael F. Billett;Claire M. Deacon;Sheila M. Palmer;Julian J. C. Dawson

  • Relationship between PCO2 and Dissolved Organic Carbon in Northern Wisconsin Lakes

    Diane Hope;Timothy K. Kratz;Joan L. Riera

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael F. Billett
Michael F. Billett University of Stirling
Nancy B. Grimm
Nancy B. Grimm Arizona State University
Jason P. Kaye
Jason P. Kaye Pennsylvania State University
Malcolm S. Cresser
Malcolm S. Cresser University of York
Lawrence A. Baker
Lawrence A. Baker University of Minnesota
Ann P. Kinzig
Ann P. Kinzig Arizona State University
Charles L. Redman
Charles L. Redman Arizona State University
Jianguo Wu
Jianguo Wu Arizona State University
William F. Fagan
William F. Fagan University of Maryland, College Park
Timothy K. Kratz
Timothy K. Kratz University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Environmental Sciences can enhance their career prospects by exploring complementary fields through online degrees. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a vital tool in environmental research and management. For those looking to advance their skills, the best gis graduate programs offer specialized training in spatial data analysis critical for modern environmental solutions.

Public administration knowledge is also essential for shaping effective environmental policies. Professionals seeking leadership roles in government or NGOs should consider a Master of Public Administration. Accelerated options like the 1 year mpa online provide flexible paths to gain administrative skills swiftly.

Understanding the social aspects of environmental problems is equally important. Online sociology programs explore human behavior and societal impacts, offering insights that complement scientific approaches. Exploring the best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide a broader perspective on community engagement and environmental justice.

For those aiming at advanced research or academic roles without the lengthy dissertation process, consider doctorate programs tailored for flexibility. The doctorate degree online no dissertation options enable professionals to achieve their highest qualifications while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Diane Hope

Recently Published Articles