World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Malcolm S. Cresser

Malcolm S. Cresser

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
9010
World Ranking
5240
National Ranking
395

Malcolm S. Cresser publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm S. Cresser sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 246 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Malcolm S. Cresser D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm S. Cresser sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Malcolm S. Cresser is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions include work in analytical atomic spectroscopy, as reflected in recent publications and collaborations.

Cresser's recent publication includes the paper titled Annual Reports on Analytical Atomic Spectroscopy, published in 2024 in the venue of the same name, with six citations.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • D.P. Hubbard
  • Kenneth W. Jackson
  • Les Ebdon
  • J. B. Dawson
  • B. L. Sharp

The primary venue for Cresser's publications is:

  • Annual Reports on Analytical Atomic Spectroscopy

Best Publications

  • A review of the export of carbon in river water: fluxes and processes.

    D. Hope;M.F. Billett;M.S. Cresser

  • Arsenic accumulation and metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

    Md. Joinal Abedin;Malcolm S. Cresser;Andy A. Meharg;Jörg Feldmann

  • Alternative explanations for rising dissolved organic carbon export from organic soils

    Christopher D. Evans;Pippa J. Chapman;Joanna M. Clark;Don T. Monteith

  • Multi-element soil analysis: an assessment of its potential as an aid to archaeological interpretation

    Clare A. Wilson;Donald A. Davidson;Malcolm S. Cresser

  • Exports of organic carbon in two river systems in NE Scotland

    Diane Hope;Michael F. Billett;Malcolm S. Cresser

  • Effect of long-term changes in soil chemistry induced by road salt applications on N-transformations in roadside soils.

    Sophie M. Green;Robert Machin;Malcolm S. Cresser

  • The Effects of Global Climate Change on Agriculture

    Cumhur Aydinalp;Malcolm S. Cresser

  • Freezing and Its Effect on Chemical and Biological Properties of Soil

    Unknown

  • Sulphuric—perchloric acid digestion of plant material for the determination of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium

    M.S. Cresser;J.W. Parsons

  • Factors affecting the chemistry of precipitation and river water in an upland catchment

    J.M. Reid;D.A. MacLeod;M.S. Cresser

  • Riparian zone influence on stream water chemistry at different spatial scales: a GIS-based modelling approach, an example for the Dee, NE Scotland

    R P Smart;C Soulsby;M S Cresser;A J Wade

  • Soil changes in forest ecosystems: evidence for and probable causes

    Dale W. Johnson;Malcolm S. Cresser;S. Ingvar Nilsson;John Turner

  • A method for measuring free CO2 in upland streamwater using headspace analysis

    Diane Hope;Julian J.C. Dawson;Malcolm S. Cresser;Michael F. Billett

  • The nitrogen composition of streams in upland Scotland: some regional and seasonal differences

    P.J Chapman;A.C Edwards;M.S Cresser

  • Predicting stream-water quality using catchment and soil chemical characteristics

    M.F. Billett;M.S. Cresser

  • The sensitivity of surface waters of Great Britain to acidification predicted from catchment characteristics

    M. Hornung;K.R. Bull;M. Cresser;J. Ullyett

  • Factors regulating the spatial and temporal distribution of solute concentrations in a major river system in NE Scotland

    R.P Smart;C Soulsby;C Neal;A Wade

  • The prediction and management of water quality in a relatively unpolluted major Scottish catchment: current issues and experimental approaches

    Simon J. Langan;A.J. Wade;A.J. Wade;R. Smart;A.C. Edwards

  • An evaluation of the site specificity of soil elemental signatures for identifying and interpreting former functional areas

    C.A. Wilson;D.A. Davidson;M.S. Cresser

  • An evaluation of current environmental management systems as indicators of environmental performance

    Rhys Rowland‐Jones;Meinwen Pryde;Malcolm Cresser

  • Modelling streamwater quality under varying hydrological conditions at different spatial scales

    Andrew J. Wade;Andrew J. Wade;C. Neal;C. Soulsby;R.P. Smart

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony C. Edwards
Anthony C. Edwards Scotland's Rural College
Michael F. Billett
Michael F. Billett University of Stirling
Simon J. Langan
Simon J. Langan International Water Management Institute
Muhammad Riaz
Muhammad Riaz South China Agricultural University
Andrew J. Wade
Andrew J. Wade University of Reading
Colin J. McClean
Colin J. McClean University of York
Pippa J. Chapman
Pippa J. Chapman University of Leeds
Chris Soulsby
Chris Soulsby University of Aberdeen
Diane Hope
Diane Hope Arizona State University
Colin Neal
Colin Neal Ford Motor Company (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable interdisciplinary skills. An online geology degree offers a strong foundation in earth processes, critical for understanding environmental changes and natural resource management.

Likewise, mastering spatial analysis through Geographic Information Systems is essential for modern environmental professionals. The top GIS masters programs equip students with expertise to collect, analyze, and interpret geographic data, enhancing decision-making in conservation and urban planning.

Environmental challenges often intersect with policy and governance. Pursuing one of the top online MPA programs allows students to develop strong administrative and leadership skills tailored to public and environmental sectors.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is equally important. An online sociology bachelor programs can provide insights into social dynamics, enabling professionals to design community-focused environmental initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm S. Cresser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles