World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
5557
World Ranking
8393
National Ranking
632

Martin Evans publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Evans sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 211 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin Evans D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Evans sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Evans is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines primarily within environmental science and medicine.

The main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their subfields of expertise focus on:

  • Ecology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Soil Science
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Earth-Surface Processes

The scientist's research covers several key topics such as:

  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Aeolian processes and effects

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Martin Evans include:

  • Emma Shuttleworth
  • Adam Johnston
  • Danielle Alderson
  • Joseph Holden
  • Tim Allott

Their publications commonly appear in the following journals and conferences:

  • Ecological Engineering
  • Science and Medicine in Football
  • Water Resources Research
  • Geoderma
  • Strength and Conditioning Journal

Some recent papers by Martin Evans are:

  • Unilateral vs. bilateral hamstring strength assessments: comparing reliability and inter-limb asymmetries in female soccer players, 2021, Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Effects of Variations in Resistance Training Frequency on Strength Development in Well-Trained Populations and Implications for In-Season Athlete Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2021, Sports Medicine
  • National-scale geodata describe widespread accelerated soil erosion, 2020, Geoderma
  • Carbohydrate fear, skinfold targets and body image issues: a qualitative analysis of player and stakeholder perceptions of the nutrition culture within elite female soccer, 2022, Science and Medicine in Football
  • Blanket Peat Restoration: Numerical Study of the Underlying Processes Delivering Natural Flood Management Benefits, 2021, Water Resources Research

Best Publications

  • Runoff generation and water table fluctuations in blanket peat: evidence from UK data spanning the dry summer of 1995

    M.G. Evans;T.P. Burt;J. Holden;J.K. Adamson

  • Impact of land drainage on peatland hydrology

    J. Holden;M. G. Evans;T. P. Burt;M. Horton

  • Ecological restoration of rich fens in Europe and North America: from trial and error to an evidence-based approach

    Leon P. M. Lamers;Melanie A. Vile;Ab P. Grootjans;Ab P. Grootjans;Mike C. Acreman

  • Carbon balance of UK peatlands: current state of knowledge and future research challenges

    M. F. Billett;D. J. Charman;J. M. Clark;C. D. Evans

  • IUCN UK Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands

    C. G. Bain;A. Bonn;R. Stoneman;S. Chapman

  • Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services: Science, Policy and Practice

    Aletta Bonn;Tim Allott;Martin Evans;Hans Joosten

  • Eroding blanket peat catchments : global and local implications of upland organic sediment budgets.

    Martin Evans;Jeff Warburton;Juan Yang

  • High resolution quantification of gully erosion in upland peatlands at the landscape scale

    Martin Evans;John Lindsay

  • Geomorphology of Upland Peat: Erosion, Form and Landscape Change

    Martin Evans;Jeff Warburton

  • Sediment budget for an eroding peat-moorland catchment in northern England

    Martin Evans;Jeff Warburton

  • Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services

    A Bonn;T. E. H Allott;Martin G Evans;H. Joosten

  • Geomorphology of Upland Peat

    Martin Evans;Jeff Warburton

  • Water table variability and runoff generation in an eroded peatland, South Pennines, UK

    S.M. Daniels;C.T. Agnew;T.E.H. Allott;M.G. Evans

  • Heavy metal release by peat erosion in the Peak District, southern Pennines, UK

    J. J. Rothwell;S. G. Robinson;M. G. Evans;J. Yang

  • Spectral monitoring of moorland plant phenology to identify a temporal window for hyperspectral remote sensing of peatland

    Beth Cole;Beth Cole;Julia M McMorrow;Martin G Evans

  • Relationships between anthropogenic pressures and ecosystem functions in UK blanket bogs: linking process understanding to ecosystem service valuation

    Chris D. Evans;Aletta Bonn;Aletta Bonn;Joseph Holden;Mark S. Reed;Mark S. Reed

  • Arsenic retention and release in ombrotrophic peatlands.

    J.J. Rothwell;K.G. Taylor;E.L. Ander;M.G. Evans

  • Testing the utility of structure-from-motion photogrammetry reconstructions using small unmanned aerial vehicles and ground photography to estimate the extent of upland soil erosion

    Miriam Glendell;Miriam Glendell;Gareth McShane;Luke Farrow;Mike R. James

  • The flux of DOC from the UK – Predicting the role of soils, land use and net watershed losses

    Fred Worrall;Helen Davies;Anne Bhogal;Allan Lilly

  • Can carbon offsetting pay for upland ecological restoration

    Fred Worrall;Martin G Evans;Aletta Bonn;Mark S Reed

  • Restoration of blanket peat moorland delays stormflow from hillslopes and reduces peak discharge

    Emma L. Shuttleworth;Martin G. Evans;Michael Pilkington;Thomas Spencer

  • Heavy metal release by peat erosion in the Peak District

    J.J. Rothwell;M.G. Evans;T.E.H. Allott

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Worrall
Fred Worrall Durham University
Joseph Holden
Joseph Holden University of Leeds
Aletta Bonn
Aletta Bonn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Jeff Warburton
Jeff Warburton Durham University
Timothy A. Quine
Timothy A. Quine University of Exeter
Mike R. James
Mike R. James Lancaster University
Karen Anderson
Karen Anderson University of Exeter
Richard E. Brazier
Richard E. Brazier University of Exeter
Pippa J. Chapman
Pippa J. Chapman University of Leeds
Barry Rawlins
Barry Rawlins British Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals consider progressing from an eds to edd programs online, which provide specialized leadership skills applicable in environmental policy and education roles.

Alternatively, pursuing an edd without dissertation can be appealing for those seeking a doctorate with a more practical and flexible approach, allowing focus on applied research directly related to environmental challenges.

For individuals interested in the social dimensions of environmental issues, affordable options like the dsw online programs offer opportunities to address community health and social work within an environmental context.

Moreover, students looking for cost-effective credentials may benefit from a low cost online general studies degree, which provides a broad academic foundation that can be customized with environmental electives or minors, facilitating versatile career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Evans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles