World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
41
Citations
6827
World Ranking
605
National Ranking
5

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8917
World Ranking
5757
National Ranking
253

Pierre Nabat publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Nabat sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 119 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Pierre Nabat D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Nabat sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Pierre Nabat is affiliated with the Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques in France, contributing extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their research is notably concentrated within Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional work spanning Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Oceanography, and Environmental Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Climate variability and models
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations

The scientist has published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Climate Dynamics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pierre Nabat include:

  • Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Historical and future changes in air pollutants from CMIP6 models, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Large discrepancies in summer climate change over Europe as projected by global and regional climate models: causes and consequences, 2020, Climate Dynamics
  • Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols - a multi-model comparison, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated repeatedly with Pierre Nabat include:

  • Martine Michou
  • Dirk Olivié
  • Susanne E. Bauer
  • Larry W. Horowitz
  • Kostas Tsigaridis

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of CMIP6 DECK Experiments With CNRM-CM6-1

    A. Voldoire;D. Saint‐Martin;S. Sénési;B. Decharme

  • Evaluation of CNRM Earth System Model, CNRM‐ESM2‐1: Role of Earth System Processes in Present‐Day and Future Climate

    Roland Séférian;Pierre Nabat;Martine Michou;David Saint‐Martin

  • Med-CORDEX initiative for Mediterranean climate studies

    Paolo M. Ruti;Samuel Somot;F. Giorgi;Clotilde Dubois

  • Effective radiative forcing and adjustments in CMIP6 models

    Christopher J. Smith;Christopher J. Smith;Ryan J. Kramer;Ryan J. Kramer;Gunnar Myhre;Kari Alterskjær

  • Future evolution of Marine Heatwaves in the Mediterranean Sea

    Sofia Darmaraki;Samuel Somot;Florence Sevault;Pierre Nabat

  • Historical and future changes in air pollutants from CMIP6 models

    Steven T. Turnock;Robert J. Allen;Martin Andrews;Susanne E. Bauer;Susanne E. Bauer

  • Assessment of the European Climate Projections as Simulated by the Large EURO-CORDEX Regional and Global Climate Model Ensemble

    Erika Coppola;Rita Nogherotto;James M. Ciarlo;Filippo Giorgi

  • A 4-D climatology (1979–2009) of the monthly tropospheric aerosol optical depth distribution over the Mediterranean region from a comparative evaluation and blending of remote sensing and model products

    P. Nabat;S. Somot;M. Mallet;I. Chiapello

  • The Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in Southern Africa Field Campaign in Namibia: Overview, Illustrative Observations, and Way Forward

    Paola Formenti;Barbara d'Anna;Cyrille Flamant;Marc Mallet

  • Contribution of anthropogenic sulfate aerosols to the changing Euro-Mediterranean climate since 1980

    Pierre Nabat;Samuel Somot;Marc Mallet;Arturo Sanchez-Lorenzo

  • Direct and semi-direct aerosol radiative effect on the Mediterranean climate variability using a coupled regional climate system model

    Pierre Nabat;Samuel Somot;Marc Mallet;Florence Sevault

  • Past Variability of Mediterranean Sea Marine Heatwaves

    Sofia Darmaraki;Samuel Somot;Florence Sevault;Pierre Nabat

  • Large discrepancies in summer climate change over Europe as projected by global and regional climate models: causes and consequences

    Julien Boé;Samuel Somot;Lola Corre;Pierre Nabat

  • Effective radiative forcing from emissions of reactive gases and aerosols – a multi-model comparison

    Gillian D. Thornhill;William J. Collins;Ryan J. Kramer;Ryan J. Kramer;Dirk Olivie

  • Evaluating stratospheric ozone and water vapour changes in CMIP6 models from 1850 to 2100

    James Keeble;Birgit Hassler;Antara Banerjee;Antara Banerjee;Ramiro Checa-Garcia

  • Description and evaluation of the tropospheric aerosol scheme in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS-AER, cycle 45R1)

    Samuel Rémy;Zak Kipling;Johannes Flemming;Olivier Boucher

  • The CNRM Global Atmosphere Model ARPEGE-Climat 6.3: Description and Evaluation

    Romain Roehrig;Isabelle Beau;David Saint‐Martin;Antoinette Alias

  • Modulation of radiative aerosols effects by atmospheric circulation over the Euro-Mediterranean region

    Pierre Nabat;Samuel Somot;Christophe Cassou;Marc Mallet

  • Overview of the Chemistry-Aerosol Mediterranean Experiment/Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing on the Mediterranean Climate (ChArMEx/ADRIMED) summer 2013 campaign

    Marc Mallet;François Dulac;Paola Formenti;Pierre Nabat

  • A fully coupled Mediterranean regional climate system model: design and evaluation of the ocean component for the 1980-2012 period

    Florence Sevault;Samuel Somot;Antoinette Alias;Clotilde Dubois

  • Characterizing, modelling and understanding the climate variability of the deep water formation in the North-Western Mediterranean Sea

    Samuel Somot;Loic Houpert;Florence Sevault;Pierre Testor

  • Dust aerosol radiative effects during summer 2012 simulated with a coupled regional aerosol–atmosphere–ocean model over the Mediterranean

    Pierre Nabat;S Somot;Marc Mallet;M Michou

  • Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of biomass-burning aerosols over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) and its sensitivity to absorbing properties: a regional climate modeling study

    Marc Mallet;Fabien Solmon;Pierre Nabat;Nellie Elguindi

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel Somot
Samuel Somot Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Martine Michou
Martine Michou Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Marc Mallet
Marc Mallet University of Tasmania
Florence Sevault
Florence Sevault Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Fabien Solmon
Fabien Solmon International Centre for Theoretical Physics
Marie Dumont
Marie Dumont Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Paola Formenti
Paola Formenti Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
François Dulac
François Dulac French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA)
Michael Schulz
Michael Schulz Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Arturo Sanchez-Lorenzo
Arturo Sanchez-Lorenzo University of Extremadura

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, a variety of online degree options are available. Programs like eds to edd program offer advanced education pathways, enabling professionals to pursue doctoral degrees in education while balancing work and life commitments.

Social work professionals aiming to impact environmental social policies can consider dsw online programs. These provide affordable routes to doctoral-level expertise, supporting a range of career growth opportunities in community and policy roles.

If you seek flexibility or a multidisciplinary approach, an online general studies degree affordable option might be ideal. These programs allow customization to include environmental subjects alongside other interests, offering balanced and cost-effective learning.

For students looking for less intensive commitments, exploring the easiest bachelor degree options can be useful. These programs typically have accessible curricula that can help build foundational knowledge before specializing in Environmental Sciences or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Nabat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles