World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
7247
World Ranking
8287
National Ranking
2960

Matthew J. Strickland publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Strickland sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 146 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Matthew J. Strickland D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Strickland sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations in the Conterminous United States Using the Random Forest Approach.

    Xuefei Hu;Jessica H. Belle;Xia Meng;Avani Wildani

  • Maternal Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution and Term Birth Weight: A Multi-Country Evaluation of Effect and Heterogeneity

    Payam Dadvand;Jennifer Parker;Michelle L. Bell;Matteo Bonzini

  • Short-term Associations between Ambient Air Pollutants and Pediatric Asthma Emergency Department Visits

    Matthew J. Strickland;Lyndsey A. Darrow;Mitchel Klein;W. Dana Flanders

  • Reactive Oxygen Species Generation Linked to Sources of Atmospheric Particulate Matter and Cardiorespiratory Effects.

    Josephine T. Bates;Rodney J. Weber;Joseph Abrams;Vishal Verma

  • Oxidative potential of ambient water-soluble PM 2.5 in the southeastern United States: contrasts in sources and health associations between ascorbic acid (AA) and dithiothreitol (DTT) assays

    Ting Fang;Vishal Verma;Josephine T. Bates;Joseph Abrams

  • Meeting report: Atmospheric pollution and human reproduction

    Rémy Slama;Lyndsey Darrow;Jennifer Parker;Tracey J. Woodruff

  • Air pollution and acute respiratory infections among children 0-4 years of age: an 18-year time-series study.

    Lyndsey A. Darrow;Mitchel Klein;W. Dana Flanders;James A. Mulholland

  • Impact of exposure measurement error in air pollution epidemiology: effect of error type in time-series studies

    Gretchen T Goldman;James A Mulholland;Armistead G Russell;Matthew J Strickland

  • The association of wildfire smoke with respiratory and cardiovascular emergency department visits in Colorado in 2012: a case crossover study.

    Breanna L. Alman;Gabriele Pfister;Hua Hao;Jennifer Stowell

  • The association of wildfire smoke with respiratory and cardiovascular emergency department visits in Colorado in 2012: a case crossover study

    Breanna L. Alman;Gabriele Pfister;Hua Hao;Jennifer Stowell

  • Ambient Air Pollution and Birth Weight in Full-Term Infants in Atlanta, 1994―2004

    Lyndsey A. Darrow;Mitchel Klein;Matthew J. Strickland;James A. Mulholland

  • Associations between Ambient Fine Particulate Oxidative Potential and Cardiorespiratory Emergency Department Visits.

    Joseph Y Abrams;Rodney J Weber;Mitchel Klein;Stefanie E Sarnat

  • Ambient Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Malformations in Atlanta, Georgia, 1986–2003

    Matthew J. Strickland;Mitchel Klein;Adolfo Correa;Mark D. Reller

  • Associations of wildfire smoke PM2.5 exposure with cardiorespiratory events in Colorado 2011-2014.

    Jennifer D. Stowell;Guannan Geng;Eri Saikawa;Howard H. Chang

  • Seasonality of birth and implications for temporal studies of preterm birth.

    Lyndsey A. Darrow;Matthew J. Strickland;Mitchel Klein;Lance A. Waller

  • Age-Specific Associations of Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter with Respiratory Emergency Department Visits in the United States.

    Heather M Strosnider;Howard H Chang;Lyndsey A Darrow;Yang Liu

  • Air Pollution and Preterm Birth in the U.S. State of Georgia (2002–2006): Associations with Concentrations of 11 Ambient Air Pollutants Estimated by Combining Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) Simulations with Stationary Monitor Measurements

    Hua Hao;Howard H. Chang;Heather A. Holmes;James A. Mulholland

  • A Method for Detection of Residual Confounding in Time-Series and Other Observational Studies

    W. Dana Flanders;Mitchel Klein;Lyndsey A. Darrow;Matthew J. Strickland

  • Maternal exposure to traffic-related air pollution and birth defects in Massachusetts.

    Mariam S. Girguis;Matthew J. Strickland;Xuefei Hu;Yang Liu

  • Method for Fusing Observational Data and Chemical Transport Model Simulations To Estimate Spatiotemporally Resolved Ambient Air Pollution

    Mariel D. Friberg;Xinxin Zhai;Heather A. Holmes;Howard H. Chang

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human behavior and societal impacts on the environment. This interdisciplinary knowledge enhances career opportunities in community planning, sustainable development, and environmental policy.

Educators looking to deepen their professional skills might consider pursuing advanced degrees such as an edd without dissertation, which offers a flexible path to leadership roles without the traditional research focus. Many institutions also offer best eds to edd programs, helping teachers and administrators transition smoothly into doctoral studies that emphasize practical skills and policy application.

For professionals aiming to specialize in mental health and social welfare within environmental communities, exploring online dsw programs in social work can open doors to advanced clinical practice and leadership positions. These programs cater to busy professionals seeking affordability and flexibility while addressing complex social and environmental challenges.

Overall, these related online degree options provide diverse career pathways that complement a foundation in Environmental Sciences and broaden the impact graduates can have in their communities and beyond.

Recently Published Articles