World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10308 9650 5408 4939 108 3489

Erin E. Morgan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erin E. Morgan between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erin E. Morgan published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 5 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
2004 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erin E. Morgan: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 4
2007 6
2008 2
2009 4
2010 0
2011 1
2012 8
2013 10
2014 13
2015 12
2016 9
2017 4
2018 4
2019 6
2020 12
2021 20
2022 9
2023 10
2024 3
2025 2
Total 142
Download as CSV

Erin E. Morgan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin E. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Erin E. Morgan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erin E. Morgan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Erin E. Morgan is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a substantial body of work related to HIV and its associated conditions. Their work spans several subfields including virology, psychiatry and mental health, infectious diseases, experimental and cognitive psychology, and pharmacology.

Their research topics encompass the following areas:

  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment

Erin E. Morgan has contributed to numerous publications, with notable recent papers including:

  • "Recent cannabis use in HIV is associated with reduced inflammatory markers in CSF and blood," 2020, Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • "Daily Cannabis Use is Associated With Lower CNS Inflammation in People With HIV," 2021, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • "Beneficial Effects of Cannabis on Blood-Brain Barrier Function in Human Immunodeficiency Virus," 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "Apathy is Associated with Critical Psychological Determinants of Medication Adherence in HIV Disease," 2020, Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
  • "Telomere length is associated with HIV infection, methamphetamine use, inflammation, and comorbid disease risk," 2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Jennifer E. Iudicello
  • Robert K. Heaton
  • Scott Letendre
  • Igor Grant
  • Ronald J. Ellis

The most common venues for their publications are:

  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Journal of NeuroVirology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Erin E. Morgan's work integrates clinical and psychological perspectives on HIV, focusing on both biomedical outcomes and behavioral factors affecting treatment adherence. The exploration of cannabis effects on inflammation and neurological function in HIV infection is a notable aspect of their research portfolio. The collaboration network and publication history indicate ongoing engagement with interdisciplinary topics relevant to HIV treatment and mental health.

Best Publications

  • Understanding the interface of HIV, trauma, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance use and its implications for health outcomes.

    D. J. Brief;A. R. Bollinger;M. J. Vielhauer;J. A. Berger-Greenstein

  • Synergistic Effects of HIV Infection and Older Age on Daily Functioning

    Erin E. Morgan;Jennifer E. Iudicello;Erica Weber;Nichole A. Duarte

  • Neuropsychological effects of 2-week continuous positive airway pressure treatment and supplemental oxygen in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized placebo-controlled study.

    Weonjeong Lim;Wayne A. Bardwell;Jose S. Loredo;Jose S. Loredo;Eui Joong Kim;Eui Joong Kim

  • Lower cognitive reserve among individuals with syndromic HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND).

    Erin E. Morgan;Steven Paul Woods;Christine Smith;Christine Smith;Erica Weber

  • Construct validity of Hopkins Verbal Learning Test- : Revised component process measures in an HIV-1 sample

    Steven Paul Woods;J. Cobb Scott;Matthew S. Dawson;Erin E. Morgan

  • Neurocognitive deficits are associated with unemployment in chronic methamphetamine users

    Erica Weber;Kaitlin Blackstone;Jennfer E. Iudicello;Erin E. Morgan

  • Substance use is a risk factor for neurocognitive deficits and neuropsychiatric distress in acute and early HIV infection

    Erica Weber;Erica Weber;Erin E. Morgan;Jennifer E. Iudicello;Kaitlin Blackstone;Kaitlin Blackstone

  • Intraindividual variability in HIV infection: evidence for greater neurocognitive dispersion in older HIV seropositive adults.

    Erin E. Morgan;Steven Paul Woods;Lisa Delano-Wood;Mark W. Bondi

  • Assessing cognitive change in Parkinson's disease: Development of practice effect-corrected reliable change indices

    Alexander I. Tröster;Steven Paul Woods;Erin E. Morgan

  • Intra-individual Neurocognitive Variability Confers Risk of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living among HIV-Seropositive Individuals without HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders

    Erin E. Morgan;Steven Paul Woods;Igor Grant

  • Predictive validity of demographically adjusted normative standards for the HIV Dementia Scale.

    Erin E. Morgan;Steven Paul Woods;J. Cobb Scott;Meredith Childers

  • Apolipoprotein E4 Genotype Does Not Increase Risk of HIV-associated Neurocognitive Disorders

    E. E. Morgan;S. P. Woods;S. L. Letendre;D. R. Franklin

  • Human immunodeficiency virus infection heightens concurrent risk of functional dependence in persons with long-term methamphetamine use.

    Kaitlin Blackstone;Jennifer E Iudicello;Erin E Morgan;Erica Weber

  • Elevated Rates of Mild Cognitive Impairment in HIV Disease

    David P. Sheppard;Jennifer E. Iudicello;Mark W. Bondi;Mark W. Bondi;Katie L. Doyle

  • Action (verb) fluency predicts dependence in instrumental activities of daily living in persons infected with HIV-1.

    Steven Paul Woods;Erin E. Morgan;Matthew Dawson;J. Cobb Scott

  • Real-world impact of neurocognitive deficits in acute and early HIV infection.

    Katie L. Doyle;Erin E. Morgan;Sheldon Morris;Davey M. Smith

  • Effects of HIV and Methamphetamine on Brain and Behavior: Evidence from Human Studies and Animal Models.

    Virawudh Soontornniyomkij;James P Kesby;James P Kesby;Erin E Morgan;Amanda Bischoff-Grethe

  • Markers of macrophage activation and axonal injury are associated with prospective memory in HIV-1 disease.

    Steven Paul Woods;Erin E. Morgan;Jennifer Marquie-Beck;Catherine L. Carey

  • Cannabis Exposure is Associated With a Lower Likelihood of Neurocognitive Impairment in People Living With HIV

    Caitlin Wei-Ming Watson;Emily W Paolillo;Erin E Morgan;Anya Umlauf

  • Neurobehavioral effects of HIV-1 infection in China and the United States: A pilot study

    Lucette A. Cysique;Hua Jin;Donald R. Franklin;Erin E. Morgan

  • Accelerated and accentuated neurocognitive aging in HIV infection.

    David P Sheppard;Jennifer E Iudicello;Erin E Morgan;Rujvi Kamat

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven Paul Woods
Steven Paul Woods University of Houston
Igor Grant
Igor Grant University of California, San Diego
Scott Letendre
Scott Letendre University of California, San Diego
Robert K. Heaton
Robert K. Heaton University of California, San Diego
Ronald J. Ellis
Ronald J. Ellis University of California, San Diego
David J. Moore
David J. Moore University of California, San Diego
Thomas D. Marcotte
Thomas D. Marcotte University of California, San Diego
Donald Franklin
Donald Franklin University of California, San Diego
J. Cobb Scott
J. Cobb Scott University of Pennsylvania
Paul E. Gilbert
Paul E. Gilbert San Diego State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various online programs and specialized career pathways. Many students continue their education to fulfill requirements for counseling and licensure, preparing them for impactful roles in mental health services. A common path is becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), but requirements and processes can differ significantly by state.

For example, if you're interested in how to get an lpc license in Massachusetts, you’ll find specific educational prerequisites and supervised clinical experience hours needed. Similarly, Michigan licensed professional counselor requirements feature distinctive guidelines you must follow, including program accreditation and rigorous exam criteria.

Other states, such as Minnesota, also have unique Minnesota lpc licensure requirements that address coursework, practicum experiences, and application procedures. In Mississippi, aspiring counselors must review the detailed lpc licensure requirements in Mississippi to ensure compliance with state standards.

Before enrolling in an online psychology or counseling program, be sure to review your target state’s rules. This ensures that your chosen degree will support your career goals and meet licensure requirements where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Erin E. Morgan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles