World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9692 9066 428 414 77 9170

Maarten A. S. Boksem publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maarten A. S. Boksem between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maarten A. S. Boksem published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2012. 7 of the 93 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2012. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
2005 2025

93 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maarten A. S. Boksem: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 3
2007 3
2008 4
2009 2
2010 7
2011 7
2012 14
2013 4
2014 3
2015 3
2016 1
2017 3
2018 1
2019 5
2020 9
2021 4
2022 6
2023 4
2024 4
2025 3
Total 93
Download as CSV

Maarten A. S. Boksem publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten A. S. Boksem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 77
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Maarten A. S. Boksem D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maarten A. S. Boksem sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maarten A. S. Boksem is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with particular expertise in cognitive neuroscience. They have contributed extensively to the study of neural and behavioral psychology, with additional work spanning safety research, economics and econometrics, social psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Boksem's research topics cover a range of areas including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Boksem include:

  • Ale Smidts
  • Sebastian Speer
  • Hang-Yee Chan
  • Alan G. Sanfey
  • Roeland C. Dietvorst

Boksem has published in several prominent venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • NeuroImage
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Recent published papers include:

  • "Cognitive control increases honesty in cheaters but cheating in those who are honest" (2020), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Measuring Neural Arousal for Advertisements and Its Relationship With Advertising Success" (2020), Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Cognitive control and dishonesty" (2022), Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Individual differences in (dis)honesty are represented in the brain's functional connectivity at rest" (2021), NeuroImage
  • "Decoding dynamic affective responses to naturalistic videos with shared neural patterns" (2020), NeuroImage

Best Publications

  • Effects of mental fatigue on attention: An ERP study

    Maarten A.S. Boksem;Theo F. Meijman;Monicque M. Lorist

  • Mental fatigue: costs and benefits.

    Maarten A.S. Boksem;Mattie Tops;Mattie Tops

  • Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring.

    Maarten A.S. Boksem;Theo F. Meijman;Monicque M. Lorist

  • Impaired cognitive control and reduced cingulate activity during mental fatigue

    Monicque M. Lorist;Maarten A.S. Boksem;K. Richard Ridderinkhof;K. Richard Ridderinkhof

  • Oxytocin modulates amygdala, insula, and inferior frontal gyrus responses to infant crying: a randomized controlled trial.

    Madelon M.E. Riem;Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg;Suzanne Pieper;Mattie Tops;Mattie Tops

  • Brain Responses to Movie Trailers Predict Individual Preferences for Movies and Their Population-Wide Commercial Success:

    Maarten A.S. Boksem;Ale Smidts

  • Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity.

    Maarten A.S. Boksem;Mattie Tops;Anne E. Wester;Anne E. Wester;Theo F. Meijman

  • Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.

    Maarten A S Boksem;David De Cremer

  • No Laughing Matter: Intranasal Oxytocin Administration Changes Functional Brain Connectivity during Exposure to Infant Laughter

    Madelon M E Riem;Marinus H van IJzendoorn;Mattie Tops;Maarten A S Boksem;Maarten A S Boksem

  • A potential role of the inferior frontal gyrus and anterior insula in cognitive control, brain rhythms, and event-related potentials

    Mattie Tops;Maarten A. S. Boksem;Maarten A. S. Boksem

  • Testosterone Inhibits Trust but Promotes Reciprocity

    Maarten A. S. Boksem;Maarten A. S. Boksem;Pranjal H. Mehta;Pranjal H. Mehta;Pranjal H. Mehta;Bram Van den Bergh;Veerle van Son

  • Advancing consumer neuroscience

    Ale Smidts;Ming Hsu;Alan G. Sanfey;Maarten A. S. Boksem

  • Internally-directed cognition and mindfulness: An integrative perspective derived from predictive and reactive control systems theory

    Mattie Tops;Maarten A. S. Boksem;Markus Quirin;Hans IJzerman

  • Cortisol-induced increases of plasma oxytocin levels predict decreased immediate free recall of unpleasant words

    Mattie Tops;Femke T. A. Buisman-Pijlman;Maarten A. S. Boksem;Maarten A. S. Boksem;Albertus A. Wijers

  • Task engagement and the relationships between the error-related negativity, agreeableness, behavioral shame proneness and cortisol.

    Mattie Tops;Maarten A.S. Boksem;Anne E. Wester;Anne E. Wester;Monicque M. Lorist

  • The Importance of Failure: Feedback-Related Negativity Predicts Motor Learning Efficiency

    Jurjen van der Helden;Maarten A. S. Boksem;Jorian H. G. Blom

  • Sensitivity to punishment and reward omission: Evidence from error-related ERP components

    Maarten A.S. Boksem;Mattie Tops;Evelien Kostermans;David De Cremer

  • Social power and approach-related neural activity

    Maarten A. S. Boksem;Ruud Smolders;David De Cremer

  • Oxytocin effects on complex brain networks are moderated by experiences of maternal love withdrawal

    Madelon M.E. Riem;Marinus H. van IJzendoorn;Mattie Tops;Maarten A.S. Boksem;Maarten A.S. Boksem

  • Serotonin: modulator of a drive to withdraw

    Mattie Tops;Sascha Russo;Maarten A.S. Boksem;Don M. Tucker

  • Emotional Responses to Movie-Trailers Predict Individual Preferences For Movies and Their Population-Wide Commercial Success

    Maarten Boksem;Hang-Yee Chan;Vincent Schoots;Alan Sanfey

Frequent Co-Authors

Mattie Tops
Mattie Tops Leiden University
Ale Smidts
Ale Smidts Erasmus University Rotterdam
Alan G. Sanfey
Alan G. Sanfey Radboud University
David De Cremer
David De Cremer National University of Singapore
Monicque M. Lorist
Monicque M. Lorist University of Groningen
Albertus A. Wijers
Albertus A. Wijers University of Groningen
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts Leiden University
Sander L. Koole
Sander L. Koole Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marinus H. van IJzendoorn
Marinus H. van IJzendoorn University College London
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering an online psychology degree can open doors to a wide range of rewarding careers. One fast-growing pathway is substance abuse counseling, a field deeply connected to mental health and social support. Many aspiring counselors start with a bachelor’s or master’s in psychology, but additional local certification is typically required to practice in specific areas.

Each city or state has its own process and standards for becoming a substance abuse counselor. For example, requirements for the Plano substance abuse counselor certification requirements differ from those in Florida, where the Port St. Lucie substance abuse counselor certification requirements apply. If you’re interested in the Pacific Northwest, you’ll need to review the substance abuse counselor requirements in Portland. Meanwhile, those looking at opportunities in North Carolina should familiarize themselves with the Raleigh substance abuse counselor certification requirements.

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees can give you the flexibility to meet these diverse requirements while balancing your other commitments. As you plan your career path, be sure to check local guidelines to ensure you meet all educational and licensure standards.

Best Scientists Citing Maarten A. S. Boksem

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles