World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 66 381 354 13 12 193 18555

Joep Cornelissen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joep Cornelissen between 1959 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joep Cornelissen published across 67 years, from 1959 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2017. 18 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2017. 1959: 2 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications
1959 2025

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joep Cornelissen: publications per year, 1959 to 2025
Year Publications
1959 2
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 4
2001 8
2002 5
2003 5
2004 3
2005 3
2006 7
2007 6
2008 9
2009 2
2010 3
2011 10
2012 8
2013 11
2014 11
2015 13
2016 8
2017 18
2018 4
2019 16
2020 9
2021 14
2022 13
2023 8
2024 6
2025 12
Total 222
Download as CSV

Joep Cornelissen publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joep Cornelissen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 190–194 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 193 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35 193
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Joep Cornelissen D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joep Cornelissen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20 66
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Joep Cornelissen is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences.

The main subfields of study in Cornelissen's work include:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cornelissen's topics of research involve various aspects of management and organizational studies, with notable attention to:

  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Management Theory and Practice
  • Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Cornelissen include:

  • What Theory Is and Can Be: Forms of Theorizing in Organizational Scholarship, 2021, Organization Theory
  • Building Character: The Formation of a Hybrid Organizational Identity in a Social Enterprise, 2020, Journal of Management Studies

Other papers listed involve collaborations with researchers such as Elco van Burg, Bill Harley, and Ira Chatterjee, but were not solely authored by Cornelissen.

Frequent co-authors working with Cornelissen are:

  • Mirjam Werner
  • Dennis Schoeneborn
  • Sai Kalvapalle
  • Elco van Burg
  • Markus A. Höllerer

Cornelissen's research outputs are regularly published in venues including:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Academy of Management Review
  • Organization Theory
  • Organizational Research Methods

Additionally, Cornelissen is credited with book publications through the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. One notable book is Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice, published in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice

    Joep P. Cornelissen

  • Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue

    Francois Cooren;Timothy Kuhn;Joep P. Cornelissen;Timothy Adrian Robert Clark

  • Social Identity, Organizational Identity and Corporate Identity: Towards an Integrated Understanding of Processes, Patternings and Products

    Joep P. Cornelissen;S. Alexander Haslam;John M. T. Balmer

  • Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Mirjam D. Werner

  • Beyond Compare: Metaphor In Organization Theory

    Joep P. Cornelissen

  • Imagining and Rationalizing Opportunities: Inductive Reasoning and the Creation and Justification of New Ventures

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Jean S. Clarke

  • Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Rodolphe Durand;Peer Fiss;John C. Lammers

  • Putting Communication Front and Center in Institutional Theory and Analysis

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Rodolphe Durand;Peer C. Fiss;John C. Lammers

  • Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature

    Unknown

  • Metaphor in Organizational Research: Context, Modalities and Implications for Research — Introduction

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Cliff Oswick;Lars Thøger Christensen;Nelson Phillips

  • Sensemaking Under Pressure: The Influence of Professional Roles and Social Accountability on the Creation of Sense

    Joep P. Cornelissen

  • Editor’s Comments: Developing Propositions, a Process Model, or a Typology? Addressing the Challenges of Writing Theory Without a Boilerplate

    Joep Cornelissen

  • The contraction of meaning: : the combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the stockwell shooting

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Saku Mantere;Eero Vaara;Eero Vaara

  • Corporate Communications: Theory and Practice

    Unknown

  • The Role of Analogy and Metaphor in the Framing and Legitimization of Strategic Change

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Robin Holt;Mike Zundel

  • Bridging Corporate and Organizational Communication: Review, Development and a Look to the Future

    Lars Thøger Christensen;Joep Cornelissen

  • Preserving Theoretical Divergence in Management Research: Why the Explanatory Potential of Qualitative Research Should Be Harnessed Rather than Suppressed

    Joep P. Cornelissen

  • Managing corporate identity: an integrative framework of dimensions and determinants

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Wim J.L. Elving

  • Making Sense of Theory Construction: Metaphor and Disciplined Imagination

    Joep P. Cornelissen

  • What Are We Playing at? Theatre, Organization, and the Use of Metaphor

    Joep P. Cornelissen

  • Corporate image: an audience centred model

    Joep Cornelissen

  • On the ‘Organizational Identity’ Metaphor

    J. P. Cornelissen

  • Moving Forward: Developing Theoretical Contributions in Management Studies

    Joep P. Cornelissen;Rodolphe Durand

Frequent Co-Authors

Rodolphe Durand
Rodolphe Durand Hautes Etudes Commerciales de Paris
Eero Vaara
Eero Vaara University of Oxford
Lars Thøger Christensen
Lars Thøger Christensen Copenhagen Business School
S. Alexander Haslam
S. Alexander Haslam University of Queensland
Peer C. Fiss
Peer C. Fiss University of Southern California
Michael Lounsbury
Michael Lounsbury University of Alberta
Mario Kafouros
Mario Kafouros University of Manchester
Andrew Delios
Andrew Delios National University of Singapore
François Cooren
François Cooren University of Montreal
Alan Cienki
Alan Cienki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways in Business and Management goes beyond traditional degrees. Today’s online learning landscape provides a wealth of specialized options, often tailored to diverse professional goals and timelines.

For those aiming for leadership roles, an online phd organizational leadership equips you to tackle complex organizational challenges at the highest level. If you’re interested in the construction industry, an accelerated construction management degree can fast-track your advancement while offering vital project management skills.

Healthcare remains a booming field. Earning a healthcare administration online degree opens pathways into hospital, clinic, or health services management. When choosing a program, be sure to consider nationally accredited online colleges to ensure your credentials are widely recognized and respected by employers.

Each of these online degrees supports flexible learning while helping students align their education with specific career goals in management, construction, healthcare, and organizational leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Joep Cornelissen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles