World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8351 4449 84 24713

Joseph T. Mullan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joseph T. Mullan between 1978 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joseph T. Mullan published across 42 years, from 1978 to 2019, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1995. 1 of the 89 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1995. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 14 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 14 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1978 2019

89 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joseph T. Mullan: publications per year, 1978 to 2019
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 14
1996 3
1997 1
1998 4
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 2
2003 2
2004 6
2005 2
2006 1
2007 7
2008 2
2009 8
2010 2
2011 2
2012 1
2013 1
2014 2
2015 2
2016 1
2017 14
2018 0
2019 1
Total 89
Download as CSV

Joseph T. Mullan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph T. Mullan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 84
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joseph T. Mullan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph T. Mullan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joseph T. Mullan was affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco, in the United States. Their academic career involved contributions primarily linked to this institution.

Throughout their professional tenure, Joseph T. Mullan did not have published papers listed in the available data, and therefore, no specific paper titles, publication years, or venues are provided.

There are no recorded frequent co-authors associated with Joseph T. Mullan in the available information.

The data does not include any frequent publication venues connected to this scientist.

Joseph T. Mullan's work did not have specified fields or subfields of study documented in the source data. Likewise, there were no main topics or thematic areas linked to their research activities listed.

There is no information available about book publications or awards received by Joseph T. Mullan.

The scientist is deceased, indicating that their contributions concluded prior to the current period of data compilation.

Best Publications

  • The stress process.

    L I Pearlin;M A Lieberman;E G Menaghan;J T Mullan

  • Caregiving and the Stress Process: An Overview of Concepts and Their Measures

    Leonard I. Pearlin;Joseph T. Mullan;Shirley J. Semple;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale.

    William H. Polonsky;Lawrence Fisher;Jay Edward Earles;R. James Dudl

  • Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

    Lawrence Fisher;Joseph T Mullan;Patricia A Areán;Russell E. Glasgow

  • When Is Diabetes Distress Clinically Meaningful?: Establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale

    Lawrence Fisher;Danielle M. Hessler;William H. Polonsky;Joseph Mullan

  • A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with Type 2 diabetes

    L. Fisher;M. M. Skaff;J. T. Mullan;P. Arean

  • Clinical Depression Versus Distress Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Not Just a Question of Semantics

    Lawrence Fisher;Marilyn M. Skaff;Joseph T. Mullan;Patricia Arean

  • Development of a Brief Diabetes Distress Screening Instrument

    Lawrence Fisher;Russell E. Glasgow;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • Validation of the HIV/AIDS Stigma Instrument - PLWA (HASI-P)

    William L Holzemer;Leana R Uys;Maureen L Chirwa;Minrie Greeff

  • PREDICTING DIABETES DISTRESS in PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

    Lawrence Fisher;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff;Russell E. Glasgow

  • The family and disease management in Hispanic and European-American patients with type 2 diabetes

    L Fisher;C A Chesla;M M Skaff;C Gilliss

  • Transitions in the caregiving career : Effects on sense of mastery

    Marilyn McKean Skaff;Leonard I. Pearlin;Joseph T. Mullan

  • HIV stigma and missed medications in HIV-positive people in five African countries.

    Priscilla S. Dlamini;Dean Wantland;Lucy N. Makoae;Maureen Chirwa

  • Contributors to Depression in Latino and European-American Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

    Lawrence Fisher;Catherine A. Chesla;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • Perceived HIV stigma and life satisfaction among persons living with HIV infection in five African countries: a longitudinal study.

    Minrie Greeff;Leana R. Uys;Dean Wantland;Lucy Makoae

  • Caregiving and its social support.

    Leonard I. Pearlin;Carol S. Aneshensel;Joseph T. Mullan;Carol J. Whitlatch

  • Family and Disease Management in African-American Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

    Catherine A. Chesla;Lawrence Fisher;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • The Bereaved Caregiver: A Prospective Study of Changes in Well-Being

    Joseph T. Mullan

  • Sources and determinants of social support for caregivers of persons with AIDS.

    Heather A. Turner;Leonard I. Pearlin;Joseph T. Mullan

  • Problem Solving and Diabetes Self-Management Investigation in a large, multiracial sample

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lawrence Fisher;Marilyn Skaff;Joe Mullan

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonard I. Pearlin
Leonard I. Pearlin University of Maryland, College Park
Lawrence Fisher
Lawrence Fisher University of California, San Francisco
Carol S. Aneshensel
Carol S. Aneshensel University of California, Los Angeles
Steven H. Zarit
Steven H. Zarit Pennsylvania State University
Catherine A. Chesla
Catherine A. Chesla University of California, San Francisco
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Charlene Harrington
Charlene Harrington University of California, San Francisco
Patricia A. Areán
Patricia A. Areán University of Washington
Kevin Durrheim
Kevin Durrheim University of Johannesburg
Anita L. Stewart
Anita L. Stewart University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a diverse range of options, especially with the growing demand for specialists in allied health fields. One prominent pathway is speech-language pathology, a role that helps individuals overcome communication disorders. For those considering this profession, it’s important to understand both the educational and certification requirements specific to each state.

The journey typically begins by earning a relevant bachelor’s degree, followed by a master’s in speech-language pathology. After completing your education, each state has distinct licensing procedures. For instance, you can review the step-by-step process of how to become a speech language pathologist in Rhode Island, which covers key academic and examination requirements. Similarly, if you’re planning to work in the South, see the South Carolina speech pathologist certification requirements to understand what credentials are needed.

For those looking to practice in other regions, take a look at the guidelines on how to become a speech language pathologist in South Dakota or the specific slp requirements in Tennessee. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees, making it easier than ever to start or advance your career from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph T. Mullan

Recently Published Articles