World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
24713
World Ranking
8351
National Ranking
4449

Joseph T. Mullan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph T. Mullan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joseph T. Mullan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph T. Mullan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph T. Mullan was affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco, in the United States. Their academic career involved contributions primarily linked to this institution.

Throughout their professional tenure, Joseph T. Mullan did not have published papers listed in the available data, and therefore, no specific paper titles, publication years, or venues are provided.

There are no recorded frequent co-authors associated with Joseph T. Mullan in the available information.

The data does not include any frequent publication venues connected to this scientist.

Joseph T. Mullan's work did not have specified fields or subfields of study documented in the source data. Likewise, there were no main topics or thematic areas linked to their research activities listed.

There is no information available about book publications or awards received by Joseph T. Mullan.

The scientist is deceased, indicating that their contributions concluded prior to the current period of data compilation.

Best Publications

  • The stress process.

    L I Pearlin;M A Lieberman;E G Menaghan;J T Mullan

  • Caregiving and the Stress Process: An Overview of Concepts and Their Measures

    Leonard I. Pearlin;Joseph T. Mullan;Shirley J. Semple;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale.

    William H. Polonsky;Lawrence Fisher;Jay Edward Earles;R. James Dudl

  • Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

    Lawrence Fisher;Joseph T Mullan;Patricia A Areán;Russell E. Glasgow

  • When Is Diabetes Distress Clinically Meaningful?: Establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale

    Lawrence Fisher;Danielle M. Hessler;William H. Polonsky;Joseph Mullan

  • A longitudinal study of affective and anxiety disorders, depressive affect and diabetes distress in adults with Type 2 diabetes

    L. Fisher;M. M. Skaff;J. T. Mullan;P. Arean

  • Clinical Depression Versus Distress Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Not Just a Question of Semantics

    Lawrence Fisher;Marilyn M. Skaff;Joseph T. Mullan;Patricia Arean

  • Development of a Brief Diabetes Distress Screening Instrument

    Lawrence Fisher;Russell E. Glasgow;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • Validation of the HIV/AIDS Stigma Instrument - PLWA (HASI-P)

    William L Holzemer;Leana R Uys;Maureen L Chirwa;Minrie Greeff

  • PREDICTING DIABETES DISTRESS in PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

    Lawrence Fisher;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff;Russell E. Glasgow

  • The family and disease management in Hispanic and European-American patients with type 2 diabetes

    L Fisher;C A Chesla;M M Skaff;C Gilliss

  • Transitions in the caregiving career : Effects on sense of mastery

    Marilyn McKean Skaff;Leonard I. Pearlin;Joseph T. Mullan

  • HIV stigma and missed medications in HIV-positive people in five African countries.

    Priscilla S. Dlamini;Dean Wantland;Lucy N. Makoae;Maureen Chirwa

  • Contributors to Depression in Latino and European-American Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

    Lawrence Fisher;Catherine A. Chesla;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • Perceived HIV stigma and life satisfaction among persons living with HIV infection in five African countries: a longitudinal study.

    Minrie Greeff;Leana R. Uys;Dean Wantland;Lucy Makoae

  • Caregiving and its social support.

    Leonard I. Pearlin;Carol S. Aneshensel;Joseph T. Mullan;Carol J. Whitlatch

  • Family and Disease Management in African-American Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

    Catherine A. Chesla;Lawrence Fisher;Joseph T. Mullan;Marilyn M. Skaff

  • The Bereaved Caregiver: A Prospective Study of Changes in Well-Being

    Joseph T. Mullan

  • Sources and determinants of social support for caregivers of persons with AIDS.

    Heather A. Turner;Leonard I. Pearlin;Joseph T. Mullan

  • Problem Solving and Diabetes Self-Management Investigation in a large, multiracial sample

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lawrence Fisher;Marilyn Skaff;Joe Mullan

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonard I. Pearlin
Leonard I. Pearlin University of Maryland, College Park
Lawrence Fisher
Lawrence Fisher University of California, San Francisco
Carol S. Aneshensel
Carol S. Aneshensel University of California, Los Angeles
Steven H. Zarit
Steven H. Zarit Pennsylvania State University
Catherine A. Chesla
Catherine A. Chesla University of California, San Francisco
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Charlene Harrington
Charlene Harrington University of California, San Francisco
Patricia A. Areán
Patricia A. Areán University of Washington
Kevin Durrheim
Kevin Durrheim University of Johannesburg
Anita L. Stewart
Anita L. Stewart University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a diverse range of options, especially with the growing demand for specialists in allied health fields. One prominent pathway is speech-language pathology, a role that helps individuals overcome communication disorders. For those considering this profession, it’s important to understand both the educational and certification requirements specific to each state.

The journey typically begins by earning a relevant bachelor’s degree, followed by a master’s in speech-language pathology. After completing your education, each state has distinct licensing procedures. For instance, you can review the step-by-step process of how to become a speech language pathologist in Rhode Island, which covers key academic and examination requirements. Similarly, if you’re planning to work in the South, see the South Carolina speech pathologist certification requirements to understand what credentials are needed.

For those looking to practice in other regions, take a look at the guidelines on how to become a speech language pathologist in South Dakota or the specific slp requirements in Tennessee. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees, making it easier than ever to start or advance your career from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph T. Mullan

Recently Published Articles