World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
27957
World Ranking
12730
National Ranking
6510

Psychology

D-Index
81
Citations
23648
World Ranking
1389
National Ranking
834

William E. Haley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Haley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 245 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William E. Haley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Haley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William E. Haley is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, focusing primarily on social sciences, medicine, and health professions. The scientist's work is concentrated in specific subfields including general health professions, sociology and political science, health, psychiatry and mental health, and clinical psychology.

The primary research topics of William E. Haley encompass:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Geriatric care and nursing homes
  • Palliative care and end-of-life issues
  • Family support in illness
  • Health and wellbeing research

William E. Haley's recent papers include the following:

  • "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Dementia Caregivers' Well-Being" (2020, The Gerontologist)
  • "Stress, Burden, and Well-Being in Dementia and Nondementia Caregivers: Insights From the Caregiving Transitions Study" (2020, The Gerontologist)
  • "Effects of Transitions to Family Caregiving on Well-Being: A Longitudinal Population-Based Study" (2020, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
  • "Care Demands and Well-Being of Primary and Secondary Non-Spousal Caregivers of Aging Adults" (2020, Clinical Gerontologist)
  • "Rationale, Design, and Implementation of Intensive Risk Factor Treatment in the CREST2 Trial" (2020, Stroke)

The frequent co-authors collaborating with William E. Haley are:

  • David L. Roth
  • Yuri Jang
  • Debra Dobbs
  • Joanne Elayoubi
  • Virginia J. Howard

William E. Haley's publications have appeared extensively in the following venues:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • The Gerontologist
  • Clinical Gerontologist
  • Journal of Aging and Health
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B

The scientist has been recognized with the following awards:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2018
  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 1995

Best Publications

  • Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Jeff D. Williamson;Mark A. Supiano;Mark A. Supiano;William B. Applegate;Dan R. Berlowitz;Dan R. Berlowitz

  • Stress, appraisal, coping, and social support as predictors of adaptational outcome among dementia caregivers.

    William E. Haley;Ellen G. Levine;S. Lane Brown;Alfred A. Bartolucci

  • Informal Caregiving and Its Impact on Health: A Reappraisal From Population-Based Studies

    David L. Roth;Lisa Fredman;William E. Haley

  • Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease

    Mary S. Mittelman;William E. Haley;Olivio J. Clay;David L. Roth

  • Current Research Findings on End-of-Life Decision Making Among Racially or Ethnically Diverse Groups

    Jung Kwak;William E. Haley

  • Appraisal, Coping, and Social Support as Mediators of Well-Being in Black and White Family Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

    William E. Haley;David L. Roth;Marci I. Coleton;Greg R. Ford

  • Family caregiving for patients with stroke. Review and analysis

    Beth Han;William E. Haley

  • End-of-life care and the effects of bereavement on family caregivers of persons with dementia.

    Richard Schulz;Aaron B. Mendelsohn;William E. Haley;Diane Mahoney

  • Psychological, social, and health consequences of caring for a relative with senile dementia.

    William E. Haley;Ellen G. Levine;S. Lane Brown;Jack W. Berry

  • Sustained Benefit of Supportive Intervention for Depressive Symptoms in Caregivers of Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease

    Mary S. Mittelman;David L. Roth;David W. Coon;William E. Haley

  • Predicting Longitudinal Changes in Caregiver Physical and Mental Health: A Stress Process Model

    Kathryn T. Goode;William E. Haley;David L. Roth;Greg R. Ford

  • Predictors of depression and life satisfaction among spousal caregivers in hospice: application of a stress process model.

    William E. Haley;Laurie A. LaMonde;Beth Han;Allison M. Burton

  • Psychological, social, and health impact of caregiving: A comparison of Black and White dementia family caregivers and noncaregivers.

    William E. Haley;Constance A. C. West;Virginia G. Wadley;Greg R. Ford

  • Impact of coping skills intervention with family caregivers of hospice patients with cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

    A.R.N.P. Susan C. McMillan Ph.D.;Brent J. Small;Michael Weitzner;Ronald Schonwetter

  • The Role of Mastery and Social Resources in the Associations Between Disability and Depression in Later Life

    Yuri Jang;William E. Haley;Brent J. Small;James A. Mortimer

  • Radiographic assessment and psychologic variables as predictors of pain and functional impairment in osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.

    Mary N. Summers;William E. Haley;John D. Reveille;Graciela S. AlarcOan

  • Effects of Intensive BP Control in CKD

    Alfred K. Cheung;Mahboob Rahman;Mahboob Rahman;David M. Reboussin;Timothy E. Craven

  • Effects of a caregiver intervention on negative caregiver appraisals of behavior problems in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a randomized trial

    Mary S. Mittelman;David L. Roth;William E. Haley;Steven H. Zarit

  • Family caregiving and emotional strain: associations with quality of life in a large national sample of middle-aged and older adults

    David L. Roth;Martinique Perkins;Virginia G. Wadley;Ella M. Temple

  • The family caregiver's role in Alzheimer's disease.

    William E. Haley

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Roth
David L. Roth Johns Hopkins University
Brent J. Small
Brent J. Small University of South Florida
Virginia J. Howard
Virginia J. Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
Yuri Jang
Yuri Jang University of Southern California
Rebecca S. Allen
Rebecca S. Allen University of Alabama
George Howard
George Howard University of Alabama at Birmingham
Dolores Gallagher-Thompson
Dolores Gallagher-Thompson Stanford University School of Medicine
Lodovico Balducci
Lodovico Balducci University of South Florida
David A. Chiriboga
David A. Chiriboga University of South Florida
David W. Coon
David W. Coon Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a range of online programs and rewarding career paths. Many graduates gravitate toward roles like substance abuse counseling, which are in high demand across the United States.

Each state and city has specific education and certification requirements for these positions. For instance, you can find details about Richmond substance abuse counselors education requirements, which highlight both degree and practical training prerequisites. Similarly, those interested in California can review substance abuse counselor requirements in Riverside or learn about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Sacramento.

If you’re considering Minnesota, understanding Saint Paul substance abuse counselor certification requirements will help you chart your educational path. Pursuing an online degree in psychology is a flexible way to meet many of these requirements, allowing you to start building a meaningful, impactful career in human services from anywhere in the country.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Haley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles