World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
15077
World Ranking
2611
National Ranking
35

Antonio Pierro publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Pierro sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 239 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Antonio Pierro D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Pierro sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonio Pierro is affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The main topics of their work involve Social and Intergroup Psychology, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Cultural Differences and Values, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion.

Antonio Pierro has authored numerous papers, with recent publications including:

  • "Significance-Quest Theory" (2022), Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence" (2021), PLoS ONE
  • "On the psychology of extremism: How motivational imbalance breeds intemperance." (2020), Psychological Review
  • "Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Frustration-aggression hypothesis reconsidered: The role of significance quest" (2023), Aggressive Behavior

Frequent co-authors contributing to Antonio Pierro's research include Arie W. Kruglanski, Daniela Di Santo, Gennaro Pica, Erica Molinario, and Conrad Baldner.

Their work is often published in journals such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Current Psychology
  • Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • The Journal of Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • To "do the right thing" or to "just do it": locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperatives.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Erik P. Thompson;E. Tory Higgins;M. Nadir Atash

  • Groups as epistemic providers: need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti;Eraldo De Grada

  • The statistical analysis of data from small groups.

    David A. Kenny;Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro;Stefano Livi

  • Recycling: Planned and self-expressive behaviour

    Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro;Stefano Livi

  • Regulatory Mode: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Orientations

    E.Tory Higgins;Arie W Kruglanski;Antonio Pierro

  • On “Feeling Right” in Cultural Contexts: How Person-Culture Match Affects Self-Esteem and Subjective Well-Being

    C. Ashley Fulmer;Michele J. Gelfand;Arie W. Kruglanski;Chu Kim-Prieto

  • Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

    Qing Han;Bang Zheng;Mioara Cristea;Maximilian Agostini

  • The energetics of motivated cognition: a force-field analysis.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Jocelyn J. Bélanger;Xiaoyan Chen;Catalina Köpetz

  • To "Do the Right Thing" or to "Just Do It": Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Self-Regulatory Imperatives

    Unknown

  • Motivated Cognition and Group Interaction: Need for Closure Affects the Contents and Processes of Collective Negotiations

    Eraldo De Grada;Arie W. Kruglanski;Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro

  • Says Who?: Epistemic Authority Effects in Social Judgment

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Amiram Raviv;Daniel Bar-Tal;Alona Raviv

  • The Social Cognition of Immigrants' Acculturation: Effects of the Need for Closure and the Reference Group at Entry.

    Ankica Kosic;Arie W. Kruglanski;Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti

  • When similarity breeds content: need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;James Y. Shah;Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti

  • The Motivated Gatekeeper of Our Minds: New Directions in Need for Closure Theory and Research

    Arne Roets;Arie W. Kruglanski;Malgorzata Kossowska;Antonio Pierro

  • Bases of social power, leadership styles, and organizational commitment

    Antonio Pierro;Bertram H. Raven;Clara Amato;Jocelyn J. Bélanger

  • Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;M. Nadir Atash;Eraldo DeGrada;Lucia Mannetti

  • Three decades of lay epistemics: The why, how, and who of knowledge formation

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Mark Dechesne;Edward Orehek;Antonio Pierro

  • Construct validity and generalizability of the Carver–White behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system scales:

    Luigi Leone;Marco Perugini;Richard P. Bagozzi;Antonio Pierro

  • Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions

    Antonio Chirumbolo;Stefano Livi;Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro

  • Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness: The moderating role of need for cognitive closure

    Antonio Pierro;Lavinia Cicero;Marino Bonaiuto;Daan van Knippenberg

  • A cross-cultural study of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: comparing its structure in Croatia, Italy, USA and The Netherlands.

    Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro;Arie Kruglanski;Toon Taris

Frequent Co-Authors

Arie W. Kruglanski
Arie W. Kruglanski University of Maryland, College Park
Lucia Mannetti
Lucia Mannetti Sapienza University of Rome
E. Tory Higgins
E. Tory Higgins Columbia University
Jocelyn J. Bélanger
Jocelyn J. Bélanger New York University
Marino Bonaiuto
Marino Bonaiuto Sapienza University of Rome
Felicia Pratto
Felicia Pratto University of Connecticut
Daan van Knippenberg
Daan van Knippenberg Rice University
Edward Orehek
Edward Orehek San Diego State University
David A. Kenny
David A. Kenny Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
Antonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens doors to a diverse array of career opportunities. Many students pursue online degrees to gain flexibility while preparing for important licensing requirements. If you’re interested in mental health, becoming a licensed therapist can be a rewarding path. Specific requirements can vary by location, such as how to become a licensed therapist in Wichita or understanding the steps involved in how to become a licensed therapist in Winston Salem.

Another popular option is counseling, especially in specialized fields like substance abuse. Career paths for substance abuse counselors may have local requirements, as seen in the processes for substance abuse counselor requirements in Albuquerque or substance abuse counselor requirements in Anaheim.

Before choosing a pathway, research licensing regulations, degree prerequisites, and state-specific standards. Online programs can help you meet these requirements while offering the flexibility to balance studies with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Pierro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles