World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
7381
World Ranking
8510
National Ranking
179

Lucia Mannetti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Mannetti sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lucia Mannetti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucia Mannetti sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lucia Mannetti was affiliated with Sapienza University of Rome in Italy. Their research spanned across several interconnected fields within social sciences, with a focus on sociology, political science, communication, and health professions. The work also involved philosophy and gender studies as subfields.

Their recent scholarly output included four papers published between 2020 and 2021. These papers were disseminated through the Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza and the IRIS Research product catalog at Sapienza University of Rome. The detailed publications were:

  • Gender differences in traditional media and Social Network use, 2020, Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza
  • How competence and trustworthiness inferences made by voters in the centre of Italy predicts the North Italian political elections: the impact of the city size, 2020, Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza
  • Communicating the crisis through advertising. An analysis on the influence of proactive and defensive framings on product's evaluation, 2020, Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza
  • The relation between locomotion and assessment regulatory orientations and the problematic Internet use, 2021, IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)

The research topics covered key themes including:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
  • Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Health, Medicine and Society
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Throughout their career, Mannetti collaborated frequently with several coauthors. These included Ambra Brizi, Renata Metastasio, and Alessandro Biraglia, each contributing to multiple publications.

The prominent venues for publishing research findings were:

  • Università degli studi di Roma La Sapienza
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)

The scientist's main fields of study were Social Sciences, with notable involvement in the subfields of Sociology and Political Science, Communication, General Health Professions, Philosophy, and Gender Studies. Their interdisciplinary work covered a broad spectrum of social and health-related issues, particularly examining the interaction between technology, society, and media.

Best Publications

  • Groups as epistemic providers: need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti;Eraldo De Grada

  • The statistical analysis of data from small groups.

    David A. Kenny;Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro;Stefano Livi

  • Recycling: Planned and self-expressive behaviour

    Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro;Stefano Livi

  • The energetics of motivated cognition: a force-field analysis.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Jocelyn J. Bélanger;Xiaoyan Chen;Catalina Köpetz

  • Motivated Cognition and Group Interaction: Need for Closure Affects the Contents and Processes of Collective Negotiations

    Eraldo De Grada;Arie W. Kruglanski;Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro

  • Says Who?: Epistemic Authority Effects in Social Judgment

    Arie W. Kruglanski;Amiram Raviv;Daniel Bar-Tal;Alona Raviv

  • The Social Cognition of Immigrants' Acculturation: Effects of the Need for Closure and the Reference Group at Entry.

    Ankica Kosic;Arie W. Kruglanski;Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti

  • When similarity breeds content: need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;James Y. Shah;Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti

  • Psychological theory testing versus psychometric nay-saying: Comment on Neuberg et al.'s (1997) critique of the Need for Closure Scale.

    Arie W. Kruglanski;M. Nadir Atash;Eraldo DeGrada;Lucia Mannetti

  • Construct validity and generalizability of the Carver–White behavioural inhibition system/behavioural activation system scales:

    Luigi Leone;Marco Perugini;Richard P. Bagozzi;Antonio Pierro

  • Effects of need for closure on creativity in small group interactions

    Antonio Chirumbolo;Stefano Livi;Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro

  • Mindfulness, Pro-environmental Behavior, and Belief in Climate Change: The Mediating Role of Social Dominance

    Angelo Panno;Mauro Giacomantonio;Giuseppe Carrus;Fridanna Maricchiolo

  • A cross-cultural study of the Need for Cognitive Closure Scale: comparing its structure in Croatia, Italy, USA and The Netherlands.

    Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro;Arie Kruglanski;Toon Taris

  • The role of majority attitudes towards out-group in the perception of the acculturation strategies of immigrants

    Ankica Kosic;Lucia Mannetti;David Lackland Sam

  • Regulatory mode effects on counterfactual thinking and regret

    Antonio Pierro;Susanne Leder;Lucia Mannetti;E. Tory Higgins

  • Autocracy Bias in Informal Groups Under Need for Closure

    Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti;Eraldo De Grada;Stefano Livi

  • Framing of information on the use of public finances, regulatory fit of recipients and tax compliance

    Marianne Holler;Erik Hoelzl;Erich Kirchler;Susanne Leder

  • Motivated Closed-Mindedness and Creativity in Small Groups

    Antonio Chirumbolo;Lucia Mannetti;Antonio Pierro;Alessandra Areni

  • Self-monitoring: A moderating role between acculturation strategies and adaptation of immigrants

    Ankica Kosic;Lucia Mannetti;David Lackland Sam

  • Searching for Commonalities in Human Judgment: The Parametric Unimodel and its Dual Mode Alternatives

    Hans-Peter Erb;Arie W. Kruglanski

  • The city as a multi-place system: An analysis of people—urban environment transactions

    Mirilia Bonnes;Mirilia Bonnes;Lucia Mannetti;Lucia Mannetti;Gianfranco Secchiaroli;Gianfranco Secchiaroli;Giancarlo Tanucci;Giancarlo Tanucci

  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004 The Social Cognition of Immigrants' Acculturation: Effects of the Need for Closure and the Reference Group at Entry

    Ankica Kosic;Arie W. Kruglanski;Antonio Pierro;Lucia Mannetti

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Pierro
Antonio Pierro Sapienza University of Rome
Arie W. Kruglanski
Arie W. Kruglanski University of Maryland, College Park
Antonio Chirumbolo
Antonio Chirumbolo Sapienza University of Rome
David A. Kenny
David A. Kenny Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority
David L. Sam
David L. Sam University of Bergen
E. Tory Higgins
E. Tory Higgins Columbia University
Michael A. Hogg
Michael A. Hogg Claremont Graduate University
Karen Phalet
Karen Phalet KU Leuven
Jocelyn J. Bélanger
Jocelyn J. Bélanger New York University
Gaspare Galati
Gaspare Galati Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open many doors to rewarding careers like counseling, therapy, and mental health services. Today, many students seek flexible options and shorter timelines to launch their professional journey. Fortunately, accelerated online programs are available across the USA, combining convenience, rigorous learning, and state-specific pathways to licensure.

One increasingly popular route is choosing accelerated programs tailored to each state's requirements. For example, Oregon accelerated counseling programs offer streamlined curricula to help you enter the counseling workforce faster. If you’re interested in Pennsylvania, you may want to know the fastest way to become a counselor in Pennsylvania, which highlights state-specific education and licensure processes.

Similarly, Rhode Island accelerated counseling programs and the quickest path to becoming a counselor in South Carolina provide efficient academic tracks for those eager to start their careers quickly. Be sure to research each state’s unique requirements and options so you can choose the best path for your goals in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Lucia Mannetti

Recently Published Articles