World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Karen Phalet

Karen Phalet

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
6443
World Ranking
7623
National Ranking
108

Karen Phalet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Phalet sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 184 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karen Phalet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Phalet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen Phalet is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has made contributions principally within the Social Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Education, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including Social and Intergroup Psychology, Racial and Ethnic Identity Research, Cultural Differences and Values, Early Childhood Education and Development, Critical Race Theory in Education, Parental Involvement in Education, and Migration, Refugees, and Integration.

Phalet's recent publications include:

  • Fitting in: How the intergroup context shapes minority acculturation and achievement (2020), European Review of Social Psychology
  • How Diversity Approaches Affect Ethnic Minority and Majority Adolescents: Teacher-Student Relationship Trajectories and School Outcomes (2020), Child Development
  • To belong or not to belong: Protecting minority engagement in the face of discrimination (2020), International Journal of Psychology
  • Socioeconomic and gender inequalities in home learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: examining the roles of the home environment, parent supervision, and educational provisions (2022), The Educational and Developmental Psychologist
  • No man is an island: Psychological underpinnings of prosociality in the midst of the COVID-19 outbreak (2020), Personality and Individual Differences

Frequent co-authors in their work include Gülseli Baysu, Judit Kende, Colette van Laar, Jessie Hillekens, and Emanuele Politi.

Phalet has published frequently in journals such as the British Journal of Social Psychology, Child Development, Journal of Social Issues, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Best Publications

  • Intergenerational Transmission of Collectivism and Achievement Values in Two Acculturation Contexts The Case of Turkish Families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan Families in the Netherlands

    Karen Phalet;Ute Schönpflug

  • Competence and morality dimensions of national and ethnic stereotypes: a study in six eastern‐European countries

    Karen Phalet;Edwin Poppe

  • Assessment in Multicultural Groups: The Role of Acculturation

    Fons J.R. Van De Vijver;Karen Phalet

  • How Future Goals Enhance Motivation and Learning in Multicultural Classrooms

    Karen Phalet;Iris Andriessen;Willy Lens

  • Associational membership and political involvement among ethnic minority groups in Brussels

    Dirk Jacobs;Karen Phalet;Marc Swyngedouw

  • Religious Identification, Beliefs, and Practices Among Turkish Belgian and Moroccan Belgian Muslims Intergenerational Continuity and Acculturative Change

    Derya Güngör;Fenella Fleischmann;Fenella Fleischmann;Karen Phalet;Karen Phalet

  • ‘Dual’ Identity as a two edged sword: Identity threat and minority school performance

    Gülseli Baysu;Karen Phalet;Rupert Brown

  • Intergenerational Transmission in Turkish Immigrant Families: Parental Collectivism, Achievement Values and Gender Differences*

    Karen Phalet;Ute Schönpflug

  • Beyond the Ethnic-Civic Dichotomy: Cultural Citizenship as a New Way of Excluding Immigrants

    Arjan Reijerse;Kaat Van Acker;Norbert Vanbeselaere;Karen Phalet

  • A Comparative Study of Turkish and Belgian Youth

    Karen Phalet;Willem Claeys

  • Measuring immigrant integration: the case of Belgium.

    Karen Phalet;Marc Swyngedouw

  • Can School Diversity Policies Reduce Belonging and Achievement Gaps Between Minority and Majority Youth? Multiculturalism, Colorblindness, and Assimilationism Assessed.

    Laura Celeste;Gülseli Baysu;Karen Phalet;Loes Meeussen

  • Personal Adjustment to Acculturative Transitions: The Turkish Experience

    Karen Phalet;Louk Hagendoorn

  • Future goal setting, task motivation and learning of minority and non-minority students in Dutch schools

    Iris Andriessen;Karen Phalet;Willy Lens

  • Old and new inequalities in educational attainment Ethnic minorities in the Belgian Census 1991—2001

    Karen Phalet;Patrick Deboosere;Vicky Bastiaenssen

  • The Effects of Immigrant Population Size, Unemployment, and Individual Characteristics on Voting for the Vlaams Blok in Flanders 1991–1999

    Nathalie Rink;Karen Phalet;Marc Swyngedouw

  • Religious identification and politicization in the face of discrimination: support for political Islam and political action among the Turkish and Moroccan second generation in Europe.

    Fenella Fleischmann;Fenella Fleischmann;Karen Phalet;Olivier Klein

  • Religion and national identification in Europe: comparing Muslim youth in Belgium, England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden

    Fenella Fleischmann;Karen Phalet

  • Women (Do Not) Belong Here: Gender-Work Identity Conflict among Female Police Officers

    Jenny Veldman;Loes Meeussen;Colette Van Laar;Karen Phalet

  • Identity Conflict or Compatibility: A Comparison of Muslim Minorities in Five European Cities

    Fenella Fleischmann;Karen Phalet

Frequent Co-Authors

Rupert Brown
Rupert Brown University of Sussex
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra
Jan Kornelis Dijkstra University of Groningen
Marc H. Bornstein
Marc H. Bornstein National Institutes of Health
Willy Lens
Willy Lens KU Leuven
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles
Bart Duriez
Bart Duriez KU Leuven
Patrick Deboosere
Patrick Deboosere Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology grows, many students are considering flexible study options, including online degree programs. With accredited programs now available across the country, it’s easier than ever to find a program that fits your needs and career goals. For example, those looking for the best online psychology degree rankings in Pennsylvania can compare several top-quality options based on reputation, faculty expertise, and student support.

If you’re interested in specific regions, you can also explore online psychology programs in San Diego or check out the best online psychology program rankings in Texas. These resources help students weigh program strengths and pick the right pathway, whether you’re planning to work in clinical settings, counseling, research, or human resources.

For students researching nationally, reviewing the best online psychology degree programs ranking in USA provides a comprehensive overview of respected online programs. With the growing demand for psychology professionals, an online degree can open doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Phalet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles