World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3310 3050 352 333 230 22706

Robert Elliott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Elliott between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Elliott published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2025. 27 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2025. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 23 publications
1979 2025

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Elliott: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 4
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 4
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 2
1991 2
1992 3
1993 1
1994 4
1995 2
1996 1
1997 5
1998 4
1999 5
2000 5
2001 6
2002 6
2003 5
2004 19
2005 14
2006 15
2007 6
2008 9
2009 8
2010 7
2011 7
2012 11
2013 6
2014 9
2015 5
2016 6
2017 12
2018 6
2019 8
2020 2
2021 16
2022 4
2023 7
2024 4
2025 23
Total 275
Download as CSV

Robert Elliott publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 230 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 230
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Elliott D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Elliott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Robert Elliott is affiliated with the University of Strathclyde in the United Kingdom and specializes in the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology. Their research covers various subfields, including social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, philosophy, and general health professions.

Their primary research topics include psychotherapy techniques and applications, counseling, therapy and family dynamics, child therapy and development, psychology, coaching and therapy, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, attachment and relationship dynamics, and mental health and psychiatry.

Several recent papers authored or co-authored by Robert Elliott illustrate their research interests:

  • "Person-centred experiential therapy versus cognitive behavioural therapy delivered in the English Improving Access to Psychological Therapies service for the treatment of moderate or severe depression (PRaCTICED): a pragmatic, randomised, non-inferiority trial" (2021) published in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "The Strathclyde Inventory: Development of a Brief Instrument for Assessing Outcome in Counseling According to Rogers' Concept of the Fully Functioning Person" (2021) published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
  • "Efficacy of Emotion-Focused Parenting Programs for Children's Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms: A Randomized Clinical Study" (2022) published in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • "Relational dialogue in emotion-focused therapy" (2020) published in Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • "Client-identified outcomes of individual psychotherapy: a qualitative meta-analysis" (2024) published in The Lancet Psychiatry

Robert Elliott frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Jeanne C. Watson, Rhonda N. Goldman, Leslie S. Greenberg, Michaela Ladmanová, and Tomáš Řiháček.

Their work is often published in the following venues:

  • Psychotherapy Research
  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Counselling and Psychotherapy Research
  • Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies

Robert Elliott has contributed to book publications, with a notable work titled Learning emotion-focused therapy: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.) scheduled for 2025 by the American Psychological Association.

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Robert Elliott was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 2000.

Best Publications

  • Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields.

    Robert Elliott;Constance T. Fischer;David L. Rennie

  • Research Methods in Clinical Psychology: An Introduction for Students and Practitioners

    Chris Barker;Nancy Pistrang;Robert Elliott

  • Facilitating Emotional Change: The Moment-by-Moment Process

    Leslie S. Greenberg;Laura North Rice;Robert K. Elliott

  • Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research

    Robert Elliott;Ladislav Timulak

  • Learning Emotion-Focused Therapy: The Process-Experiential Approach to Change

    Robert Elliott

  • ASSIMILATION OF PROBLEMATIC EXPERIENCES BY CLIENTS IN PSYCHOTHERAPY

    William B. Stiles;Robert Elliott;Susan P. Llewelyn;Jenny A. Firth-Cozens

  • Helpful and nonhelpful events in brief counseling interviews: An empirical taxonomy.

    Robert Elliott

  • Are all psychotherapies equivalent

    William B. Stiles;David A. Shapiro;Robert Elliott

  • Utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists.

    Cheryl Morrow-Bradley;Robert Elliott

  • Psychotherapy change process research: realizing the promise.

    Robert Elliott

  • Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR) as a psychotherapy process research method.

    Robert Elliott

  • Research Methods in Clinical and Counselling Psychology

    Chris Barker;Nancy Pistrang;Robert Elliott

  • Research on experiential psychotherapies

    Robert K. Elliott;L.S. Greenberg;G. Lietaer

  • Client Retrospective Recall of Resolved and Unresolved Misunderstanding Events.

    Renee H. Rhodes;Clara E. Hill;Barbara J. Thompson;Robert Elliott

  • Therapist empathy and client outcome: An updated meta-analysis.

    Robert Elliott;Arthur C. Bohart;Jeanne C. Watson;David Murphy

  • Varieties of client experience in psychotherapy: An analysis of the literature

    Robert Elliott;Elisabeth James

  • Qualitative Change Process Research on Psychotherapy: Alternative Strategies.

    Robert Elliott;Emil Slatick;Michelle Urman

  • HERMENEUTIC SINGLE-CASE EFFICACY DESIGN

    Robert Elliott

  • Research on Humanistic- Experiential Psychotherapies

    Robert Elliott;Leslie S. Greenberg;Jeanne C. Watson;Ladislav Timulak

  • "Are all psychotherapies equivalent?".

    Unknown

  • Parental support and pressure and children's extracurricular activities: relationships with amount of involvement and affective experience of participation

    Jennifer C Anderson;Jeanne B Funk;Robert Elliott;Peg Hull Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Leslie S. Greenberg
Leslie S. Greenberg York University
William B. Stiles
William B. Stiles Miami University
Chris Barker
Chris Barker University College London
Nancy Pistrang
Nancy Pistrang University College London
Gillian E. Hardy
Gillian E. Hardy University of Sheffield
Ladislav Timulak
Ladislav Timulak Trinity College Dublin
Mick Cooper
Mick Cooper University of Roehampton
Lynne Angus
Lynne Angus York University
Michael Barkham
Michael Barkham University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees is a flexible and convenient option for many students. One major consideration is finding a program that balances quality with affordability. Fortunately, students have access to a variety of cost-effective psychology degree options across the United States.

For those interested in the Midwest, the cheapest psychology degrees in Minneapolis and the most affordable psychology degree programs in Missouri offer several accredited programs at a range of price points. If you are located in the Southeast, you can find the cheapest psychology degrees in North Carolina with flexible online or hybrid formats.

Urban environments also provide competitive options, such as the cheapest psychology programs in New York City. Whether you want to begin your career in counseling, education, social work, or research, affordable online degrees help remove financial barriers.

As you consider your next step, compare programs by reviewing curriculum, faculty expertise, and support services along with tuition rates. Taking time to research these options will put you on a clear pathway toward a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Elliott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles