World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
31
Citations
4293
World Ranking
11175
National Ranking
5844

Terri D. Conley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terri D. Conley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Terri D. Conley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Terri D. Conley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Terri D. Conley is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting fields within the social sciences and psychology, with particular emphasis on sexuality, behavior, and related health and social issues.

Conley's work primarily covers topics including:

  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences

Their disciplinary focus is rooted in Social Sciences and Psychology, with significant contributions in subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, and Accounting.

Conley has contributed to academic literature through recent papers that explore gender differences in sexuality, global inequities in research populations, and aspects of consensual non-monogamy. Notable papers include:

  • "How WEIRD and Androcentric Is Sex Research? Global Inequities in Study Populations" (2021), published in The Journal of Sex Research
  • "Women Get Worse Sex: A Confound in the Explanation of Gender Differences in Sexuality" (2022), published in Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Internalized Messages: The Role of Sexual Violence Normalization on Meaning-making after Campus Sexual Violence" (2020), published in Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma
  • "The Role of Gendered Entitlement in Understanding Inequality in the Bedroom" (2021), published in Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Are there "Better" and "Worse" Ways to be Consensually Non-Monogamous (CNM)?: CNM Types and CNM-Specific Predictors of Dyadic Adjustment" (2021), published in Archives of Sexual Behavior

Thevenues where Conley frequently publishes include:

  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Conley often collaborates with a group of frequent coauthors, including Jennifer L. Piemonte, Verena Klein, Staci Gusakova, Richard Crisp, and Nancy E. Adler. These collaborations span multiple publications and contribute to ongoing research in their areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • The Fewer the Merrier?: Assessing Stigma Surrounding Consensually Non-monogamous Romantic Relationships

    Terri D. Conley;Amy C. Moors;Jes L. Matsick;Ali Ziegler

  • A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships

    Terri D. Conley;Ali Ziegler;Amy C. Moors;Jes L. Matsick

  • A relational approach to cognition: Shared experience and relationship affirmation in social cognition.

    Curtis D. Hardin;Terri D. Conley

  • Love and sex: polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships

    Jes L. Matsick;Terri D. Conley;Ali Ziegler;Amy C. Moors

  • On the Margins: Considering Diversity among Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships

    Jennifer D. Rubin;Amy C. Moors;Jes L. Matsick;Ali Ziegler

  • Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy

    Amy C. Moors;Terri D. Conley;Robin S. Edelstein;William J. Chopik

  • Backlash From the Bedroom: Stigma Mediates Gender Differences in Acceptance of Casual Sex Offers

    Terri D. Conley;Ali Ziegler;Amy C. Moors

  • Investigation of Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships.

    Terri Conley;Jessica Matsick;Amy Catherine Moors;Ali Ziegler

  • Unfaithful Individuals are Less Likely to Practice Safer Sex Than Openly Nonmonogamous Individuals

    Terri D. Conley;Amy C. Moors;Ali Ziegler;Constantina Karathanasis

  • Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers.

    Terri D. Conley

  • Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research.

    Amy C. Moors;Jes L. Matsick;Ali Ziegler;Jennifer D. Rubin

  • Women, Men, and the Bedroom: Methodological and Conceptual Insights That Narrow, Reframe, and Eliminate Gender Differences in Sexuality

    Terri D. Conley;Amy C. Moors;Jes L. Matsick;Ali Ziegler

  • The Development of Sexual Orientation in Women

    Letitia Anne Peplau;Leah R. Spalding;Terri D. Conley;Rosemary C. Veniegas

  • Killing Us Softly? Investigating Portrayals of Women and Men in Contemporary Magazine Advertisements.

    Terri D. Conley;Laura R. Ramsey

  • Gender, Relationship Status, and Stereotyping about Sexual Risk

    Terri D. Conley;Barry E. Collins

  • A critique of Bem's "Exotic Becomes Erotic" theory of sexual orientation

    Letitia Anne Peplau;Linda D. Garnets;Leah R. Spalding;Terri D. Conley

  • More Oxygen Please!: How Polyamorous Relationship Strategies Might Oxygenate Marriage

    Terri D. Conley;Amy C. Moors

  • Mistakes that heterosexual people make when trying to appear non-prejudiced: the view from LGB people.

    Terri D. Conley;Christopher Calhoun;Sophia R. Evett;Patricia G. Devine

  • Differences Between Condom Users and Condom Nonusers in Their Multidimensional Condom Attitudes

    Terri D. Conley;Barry E. Collins

  • Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships:

    Terri D. Conley;Jennifer L. Piemonte;Staci Gusakova;Jennifer D. Rubin

  • A test of positive illusions versus shared reality models of relationship satisfaction among gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples

    Terri D. Conley;Scott C. Roesch;Letitia Anne Peplau;Michael S. Gold

Frequent Co-Authors

Letitia Anne Peplau
Letitia Anne Peplau University of California, Los Angeles
Patricia G. Devine
Patricia G. Devine University of Wisconsin–Madison
William J. Chopik
William J. Chopik Michigan State University
Sari M. van Anders
Sari M. van Anders Queen's University
Robin S. Edelstein
Robin S. Edelstein University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Torsten B. Neilands
Torsten B. Neilands University of California, San Francisco
Margaret E. Kemeny
Margaret E. Kemeny University of California, San Francisco
Janet Shibley Hyde
Janet Shibley Hyde University of Wisconsin–Madison
Scott C. Roesch
Scott C. Roesch San Diego State University
Shelley E. Taylor
Shelley E. Taylor University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to many diverse and rewarding professions. Increasingly, students are considering online programs for greater flexibility in balancing their education with work or personal commitments. Popular pathways include roles in clinical psychology, counseling, research, and applied behavior analysis.

One highly sought-after credential is the Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Becoming a BCBA can be achieved through both campus-based and online routes, which offer rigorous coursework, supervised experience, and certification exams. For specific guidance and requirements in different cities, check resources on how to become a bcba in Mesa or review the Miami bcba education requirements.

Regional differences often affect the availability of programs, internship opportunities, and local licensure requirements. Information on navigating these distinctions can be found by reading about Milwaukee bcba education requirements and tips for how to become a bcba in Minneapolis.

Exploring these alternatives helps you make informed decisions, ensuring your educational pathway aligns with both your career goals and local regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Terri D. Conley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles