World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Federica Cucchiella

Federica Cucchiella

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 41 1606 1501 40 40 86 6059

Federica Cucchiella publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Federica Cucchiella between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Federica Cucchiella published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2015. 14 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2015. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
2001 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Federica Cucchiella: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 3
2009 0
2010 3
2011 1
2012 6
2013 5
2014 6
2015 13
2016 8
2017 9
2018 6
2019 7
2020 5
2021 8
2022 5
2023 5
2024 4
2025 10
Total 111
Download as CSV

Federica Cucchiella publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Federica Cucchiella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 85–89 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 86 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94 86
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Federica Cucchiella D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Federica Cucchiella sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97 41
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Federica Cucchiella is affiliated with the University of L'Aquila in Italy and has an extensive publication record primarily focused on engineering and environmental science. Their research contributions span key areas related to sustainability, energy systems, and construction materials.

Their recent papers include:

  • Technical, economic and environmental assessment towards the sustainable goals of photovoltaic systems, 2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
  • Economic and environmental assessment of thermal insulation. A case study in the Italian context, 2021, Case Studies in Construction Materials
  • Energy Transitions in Western European Countries: Regulation Comparative Analysis, 2021, Energies
  • ASSESSMENT OF GHG EMISSIONS IN EUROPE: FUTURE ESTIMATES AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS, 2020, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal
  • Renewable Energy Policies: Bibliometric Review and Policy Implications, 2020, Environmental and Climate Technologies

The main fields of study encompassed in their work are:

  • Engineering
  • Environmental Science

Subfields notably covered include:

  • Building and Construction
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Engineering

Core topics addressed across their studies are:

  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Urban Planning and Valuation
  • Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Energy Load and Power Forecasting

The scientist has frequently published in several academic venues, including:

  • Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Energies
  • Environmental and Climate Technologies
  • Scientific Reports
  • Baltic Journal of Management

Collaborative work is a significant aspect of their research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Marianna Rotilio
  • Valeria Annibaldi
  • Pierluigi De Berardinis
  • Vincenzo Stornelli
  • Muhammad Ehtsham

Best Publications

  • Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;S.C. Lenny Koh;Paolo Rosa

  • NATURAL RESOURCE BASED GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

    Victor Guang Shi;S.C. Lenny Koh;James Baldwin;Federica Cucchiella

  • Risk management in supply chain: a real option approach

    Federica Cucchiella;Massimo Gastaldi

  • Sustainable waste management: Waste to energy plant as an alternative to landfill

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;Massimo Gastaldi

  • Modelling the correlations of e-waste quantity with economic increase

    Abhishek Kumar Awasthi;Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D'Adamo;Jinhui Li

  • End-of-Life of used photovoltaic modules: A financial analysis

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D׳Adamo;Paolo Rosa

  • Estimation of the energetic and environmental impacts of a roof-mounted building-integrated photovoltaic systems

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D'Adamo

  • A methodological framework for innovation transfer to SMEs

    Antonio C. Caputo;F. Cucchiella;Luciano Fratocchi;Pacifico Marcello Pelagagge

  • Photovoltaic energy systems with battery storage for residential areas: an economic analysis

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D'Adamo;Massimo Gastaldi

  • Sustainable management of waste-to-energy facilities

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;Massimo Gastaldi

  • Issue on supply chain of renewable energy

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo

  • Environmental and economic analysis of building integrated photovoltaic systems in Italian regions

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D'Adamo;S.C. Lenny Koh

  • A comparison of environmental and energetic performance of European countries: A sustainability index

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;Massimo Gastaldi;SC Lenny Koh

  • A techno-economic assessment of biogas upgrading in a developed market

    Francesco Ferella;Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D'Adamo;Katia Gallucci

  • Evaluating solar energy profitability: A focus on the role of self-consumption

    Davide Chiaroni;Vittorio Chiesa;Lorenzo Colasanti;Federica Cucchiella

  • Efficiency and allocation of emission allowances and energy consumption over more sustainable European economies

    F. Cucchiella;I. D'Adamo;M. Gastaldi;M. Miliacca

  • Economic Analysis of a Photovoltaic System: A Resource for Residential Households

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;Massimo Gastaldi

  • Strategic municipal solid waste management: A quantitative model for Italian regions

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;Massimo Gastaldi

  • Managing Absenteeism in the Workplace: The Case of an Italian Multiutility Company

    Federica Cucchiella;Massimo Gastaldi;Luigi Ranieri

  • An economic analysis of biogas-biomethane chain from animal residues in Italy

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;Massimo Gastaldi

  • A profitability assessment of European recycling processes treating printed circuit boards from waste electrical and electronic equipments

    Federica Cucchiella;Idiano D’Adamo;S.C. Lenny Koh;Paolo Rosa

Frequent Co-Authors

Idiano D’Adamo
Idiano D’Adamo Sapienza University of Rome
Massimo Gastaldi
Massimo Gastaldi University of L'Aquila
S.C. Lenny Koh
S.C. Lenny Koh University of Sheffield
Vincenzo Stornelli
Vincenzo Stornelli University of L'Aquila
Giuseppe Ferri
Giuseppe Ferri University of L'Aquila
Federico Frattini
Federico Frattini Polytechnic University of Milan
Davide Chiaroni
Davide Chiaroni Polytechnic University of Milan
Vittorio Chiesa
Vittorio Chiesa Polytechnic University of Milan
Jinhui Li
Jinhui Li Tsinghua University
Xianlai Zeng
Xianlai Zeng Tsinghua University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up flexible options for students interested in business and management. For those seeking specialized fields, you may consider an online bachelor's degree construction management to prepare for careers in the fast-growing building and infrastructure sectors.

The healthcare sector is another major employer for business graduates. Enrolling in online healthcare degrees equips students with the administration skills needed to thrive in hospitals, clinics, and other medical organizations.

Many students are also interested in accelerated programs to enter the workforce sooner. Fast track school programs enable learners to earn their degrees quickly without sacrificing quality.

Affordability is crucial for today’s students. When budget matters, researching the online business administration degree options at affordable colleges ensures you reach your career goals without excessive debt.

Best Scientists Citing Federica Cucchiella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles