World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
12253
World Ranking
7121
National Ranking
3851

Nicholas Ladany publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Ladany sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nicholas Ladany D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Ladany sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas Ladany is affiliated with Lehigh University in the United States. Their professional work is associated with this institution, representing its academic community.

The record does not contain specific information on recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues associated with Nicholas Ladany. Similarly, there are no listed book publications, specific fields of study, subfields, or main topics attributed to their research activity.

There is also no available data regarding awards or honors received by Nicholas Ladany.

This profile reflects the current scope of publicly available academic and research data related to Nicholas Ladany.

Best Publications

  • Consensual Qualitative Research: An Update

    Clara E. Hill;Sarah Knox;Barbara J. Thompson;Elizabeth Nutt Williams

  • Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors.

    Nicholas Ladany;Clara E. Hill;Maureen M. Corbett;Elizabeth A. Nutt

  • The Supervisory Working Alliance, Trainee Self‐Efficacy, and Satisfaction

    Nicholas Ladany;Michael V. Ellis;Myrna L. Friedlander

  • Psychotherapy trainees' experience of counterproductive events in supervision.

    Laurie A. Gray;Nicholas Ladany;Jessica A. Walker;Julie R. Ancis

  • Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review.

    Michael V. Ellis;Nicholas Ladany

  • Self-report multicultural counseling competence scales: Their relation to social desirability attitudes and multicultural case conceptualization ability.

    Madonna G. Constantine;Nicholas Ladany

  • Critical Events In Psychotherapy Supervision: An Interpersonal Approach

    Nicholas Ladany;Myrna L. Friedlander;Mary Lee Nelson

  • Supervisee multicultural case conceptualization ability and self-reported multicultural competence as functions of supervisee racial identity and supervisor focus.

    Nicholas Ladany;Arpana G. Inman;Madonna G. Constantine;Elizabeth W. Hofheinz

  • Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you?

    Kristin E. Mehr;Nicholas Ladany;Grace I.L. Caskie

  • Clinical Supervision Research from 1981 to 1993: A Methodological Critique.

    Michael V. Ellis;Nicholas Ladany;Maxine Krengel;Deborah Schult

  • A Multicultural Framework for Counselor Supervision

    Julie R. Ancis;Nicholas Ladany

  • Psychotherapy Supervisor Ethical Practices Adherence to Guidelines, the Supervisory Working Alliance, and Supervisee Satisfaction

    Nicholas Ladany;Deborah Lehrman-Waterman;Max Molinaro;Bradley Wolgast

  • Effective and Ineffective Supervision

    Nicholas Ladany;Yoko Mori;Kristin E. Mehr

  • Development and preliminary validation of the Cultural Values Conflict Scale for South Asian women.

    Arpana G. Inman;Nicholas Ladany;Madonna G. Constantine;Cathleen K. Morano

  • The Influence of Supervisory Racial Identity Interaction and Racial Matching on the Supervisory Working Alliance and Supervisee Multicultural Competence

    Nicholas Ladany;Christopher S. Brittan-Powell;Raji K. Pannu

  • Development and validation of the Evaluation Process Within Supervision Inventory

    Deborah Lehrman-Waterman;Nicholas Ladany

  • The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees' experience of role conflict and role ambiguity.

    Nicholas Ladany;Myrna L. Friedlander

  • Supervisory Style: Its Relation to the Supervisory Working Alliance and Supervisor Self-Disclosure

    Nicholas Ladany;Jessica A. Walker;Deborah S. Melincoff

  • The Content and Frequency of Supervisor Self‐Disclosures and Their Relationship to Supervisor Style and the Supervisory Working Alliance

    Nicholas Ladany;Deborah E. Lehrman-Waterman

  • Students' Perceptions of Multicultural Training in Counseling Psychology Programs

    Madonna G. Constantine;Nicholas Ladany;Arpana G. Inman;Joseph G. Ponterotto

Frequent Co-Authors

Arpana G. Inman
Arpana G. Inman Lehigh University
Madonna G. Constantine
Madonna G. Constantine Columbia University
Myrna L. Friedlander
Myrna L. Friedlander University at Albany, State University of New York
Sarah Knox
Sarah Knox Marquette University
Lynne Angus
Lynne Angus York University
Jeffrey A. Hayes
Jeffrey A. Hayes Pennsylvania State University
Louis G. Castonguay
Louis G. Castonguay Pennsylvania State University
Jacques P. Barber
Jacques P. Barber Adelphi University
Robert Elliott
Robert Elliott University of Strathclyde

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open the door to a variety of online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Social work is one of the most popular fields for psychology graduates due to its focus on helping individuals, families, and communities.

Exploring affordable social work programs in Madison or looking into the cheapest social work programs in Marion can help students minimize costs while pursuing advanced studies. Many of these programs offer online or blended learning options that provide flexibility for working professionals or those with family commitments.

In addition to affordability, it’s crucial to consider location and state-specific opportunities. For example, reviewing options for affordable social work programs in Maryland or affordable social work programs in Michigan can help align your education with local licensure requirements and job markets.

Whether your interest lies in clinical work, counseling, or research, online degree pathways in psychology and social work provide numerous opportunities to build a meaningful career while managing educational expenses.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Ladany

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles