World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
8160
World Ranking
6702
National Ranking
3633

Thomas M. Piasecki publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Piasecki sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Thomas M. Piasecki D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Piasecki sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas M. Piasecki is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the broad field of Medicine with particular emphasis on several subfields including Applied Psychology, Epidemiology, Oncology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's main research topics cover a range of areas related to health and behavior. These include Behavioral Health and Interventions, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Mental Health Research Topics, and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies.

Thomas M. Piasecki has contributed numerous articles to peer-reviewed scientific journals. Some notable recent papers include:

  • The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data, 2023, Psychological Bulletin
  • The Relationship of COVID-19 Vaccination with Mortality Among 86,732 Hospitalized Patients: Subpopulations, Patient Factors, and Changes over Time, 2023, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • The associations of smoking dependence motives with depression among daily smokers, 2021, Addiction
  • Affect relative to day-level drinking initiation: Analyzing ecological momentary assessment data with multilevel spline modeling, 2020, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Coping motives and negative affect: An ecological study of the antecedents of alcohol craving and alcohol use, 2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Their work has been disseminated through several key publication venues including:

  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Addiction
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include Michael C. Fiore, Bruce D. Bartholow, Timothy B. Baker, Karen L. Conner, and Roberto U. Cofresí.

Best Publications

  • Affective instability: measuring a core feature of borderline personality disorder with ecological momentary assessment.

    Timothy J. Trull;Marika B. Solhan;Sarah L. Tragesser;Seungmin Jahng

  • A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68).

    Megan E. Piper;Thomas M. Piasecki;E. Belle Federman;Daniel M. Bolt

  • Relapse to smoking.

    Thomas M. Piasecki

  • THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND RESEARCH SMOKING CESSATION CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE

    Michael C. Fiore;David W. Wetter;William C. Bailey;Glen Bennett

  • Smoking withdrawal dynamics in unaided quitters.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Raymond Niaura;William G. Shadel;David Abrams

  • Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael R. Hufford;Marika Solhan;Timothy J. Trull

  • Toward a dimensional and psychometrically-informed approach to conceptualizing psychopathology.

    Robert F. Krueger;Thomas M. Piasecki

  • Profiles in discouragement: two studies of variability in the time course of smoking withdrawal symptoms.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael C. Fiore;Timothy B. Baker

  • Have we lost our way? The need for dynamic formulations of smoking relapse proneness.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael C. Fiore;Danielle E. McCarthy;Timothy B. Baker

  • The subjective effects of alcohol-tobacco co-use: an ecological momentary assessment investigation.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Seungmin Jahng;Phillip K. Wood;Brandon M. Robertson

  • Life Before and After Quitting Smoking: An Electronic Diary Study

    Danielle E. McCarthy;Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael C. Fiore;Timothy B. Baker

  • Smoking withdrawal dynamics: I. Abstinence distress in lapsers and abstainers.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Douglas E. Jorenby;Stevens S. Smith;Michael C. Fiore

  • Smoking withdrawal dynamics: II. Improved tests of withdrawal-relapse relations.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Douglas E. Jorenby;Stevens S. Smith;Michael C. Fiore

  • Development and initial validation of the Hangover Symptoms Scale: prevalence and correlates of Hangover Symptoms in college students.

    Wendy S. Slutske;Thomas M. Piasecki;Erin E. Hunt-Carter

  • Listening to Nicotine: Negative Affect and the Smoking Withdrawal Conundrum

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Susan L. Kenford;Stevens S. Smith;Michael C Fiore

  • Self-monitored motives for smoking among college students.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Alison E. Richardson;Shawn M. Smith

  • Strike while the iron is hot: can stepped-care treatments resurrect relapsing smokers?

    Stevens S. Smith;Douglas E. Jorenby;Michael C. Fiore;Jane E. Anderson

  • Psychological mediators of bupropion sustained-release treatment for smoking cessation.

    Danielle E. McCarthy;Thomas M. Piasecki;Daniel L. Lawrence;Douglas E. Jorenby

  • Affect and alcohol use: an ecological momentary assessment study of outpatients with borderline personality disorder.

    Seungmin Jahng;Marika B. Solhan;Rachel L. Tomko;Phillip K. Wood

  • Reasons for Abstaining or Limiting Drinking: A Developmental Perspective

    Amee J. Epler;Kenneth J. Sher;Thomas M. Piasecki

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy B. Baker
Timothy B. Baker University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Wendy S. Slutske
Wendy S. Slutske University of Missouri
Michael C. Fiore
Michael C. Fiore University of Wisconsin–Madison
Phillip K. Wood
Phillip K. Wood University of Missouri
Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Andrew C. Heath
Andrew C. Heath Washington University in St. Louis
Bruce D. Bartholow
Bruce D. Bartholow University of Missouri
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of fulfilling career pathways, including Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). With the rise of accredited online programs, students can now complete the necessary coursework and clinical requirements more flexibly. However, it is important to note that MFT education and licensure requirements vary by location.

For instance, if you are interested in mft requirements in Toledo, you’ll find specific course, practicum, and licensing procedures. These differ from the Tucson mft education requirements, where local state regulations influence the process.

Similarly, those pursuing an MFT career in Tulsa should review the Tulsa mft education requirements for guidance on supervised experience and testing. Meanwhile, students considering practice in Virginia Beach should be aware of the Virginia Beach mft certification requirements for correct compliance.

When choosing your degree path, make sure your online program is properly accredited and aligns with the requirements of the state where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Piasecki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles