World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6702 6244 3633 3301 123 8160

Thomas M. Piasecki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas M. Piasecki between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas M. Piasecki published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2022. 20 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2022. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 10 publications
1995 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas M. Piasecki: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 4
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 5
2009 2
2010 11
2011 4
2012 4
2013 7
2014 7
2015 3
2016 3
2017 7
2018 3
2019 10
2020 6
2021 9
2022 12
2023 9
2024 10
2025 10
Total 149
Download as CSV

Thomas M. Piasecki publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas M. Piasecki, a Psychology scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, has 149 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2022, with 12 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1996, 2004 and 2005, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 4.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.8 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 50 publications, 34% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 21 publications (1.9 per year); 2006-2016: 52 publications (4.7 per year); 2017-2025: 76 publications (8.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas M. Piasecki publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Piasecki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas M. Piasecki publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Thomas M. Piasecki, a Psychology scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 123 publications - the 34th percentile of the discipline.
  • 34% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Thomas M. Piasecki, and about 66% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Thomas M. Piasecki ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Thomas M. Piasecki D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Piasecki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Thomas M. Piasecki D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Thomas M. Piasecki, a Psychology scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 45 D-Index - the 43rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 43% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Thomas M. Piasecki, and about 57% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Thomas M. Piasecki ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Thomas M. Piasecki is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the broad field of Medicine with particular emphasis on several subfields including Applied Psychology, Epidemiology, Oncology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's main research topics cover a range of areas related to health and behavior. These include Behavioral Health and Interventions, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Mental Health Research Topics, and COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies.

Thomas M. Piasecki has contributed numerous articles to peer-reviewed scientific journals. Some notable recent papers include:

  • The daily association between affect and alcohol use: A meta-analysis of individual participant data, 2023, Psychological Bulletin
  • The Relationship of COVID-19 Vaccination with Mortality Among 86,732 Hospitalized Patients: Subpopulations, Patient Factors, and Changes over Time, 2023, Journal of General Internal Medicine
  • The associations of smoking dependence motives with depression among daily smokers, 2021, Addiction
  • Affect relative to day-level drinking initiation: Analyzing ecological momentary assessment data with multilevel spline modeling, 2020, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Coping motives and negative affect: An ecological study of the antecedents of alcohol craving and alcohol use, 2021, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Their work has been disseminated through several key publication venues including:

  • Alcohol Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Psychology of Addictive Behaviors
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Addiction
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include Michael C. Fiore, Bruce D. Bartholow, Timothy B. Baker, Karen L. Conner, and Roberto U. Cofresí.

Best Publications

  • Affective instability: measuring a core feature of borderline personality disorder with ecological momentary assessment.

    Timothy J. Trull;Marika B. Solhan;Sarah L. Tragesser;Seungmin Jahng

  • A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM-68).

    Megan E. Piper;Thomas M. Piasecki;E. Belle Federman;Daniel M. Bolt

  • Relapse to smoking.

    Thomas M. Piasecki

  • THE AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE POLICY AND RESEARCH SMOKING CESSATION CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE

    Michael C. Fiore;David W. Wetter;William C. Bailey;Glen Bennett

  • Smoking withdrawal dynamics in unaided quitters.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Raymond Niaura;William G. Shadel;David Abrams

  • Assessing clients in their natural environments with electronic diaries: rationale, benefits, limitations, and barriers.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael R. Hufford;Marika Solhan;Timothy J. Trull

  • Toward a dimensional and psychometrically-informed approach to conceptualizing psychopathology.

    Robert F. Krueger;Thomas M. Piasecki

  • Profiles in discouragement: two studies of variability in the time course of smoking withdrawal symptoms.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael C. Fiore;Timothy B. Baker

  • Have we lost our way? The need for dynamic formulations of smoking relapse proneness.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael C. Fiore;Danielle E. McCarthy;Timothy B. Baker

  • The subjective effects of alcohol-tobacco co-use: an ecological momentary assessment investigation.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Seungmin Jahng;Phillip K. Wood;Brandon M. Robertson

  • Life Before and After Quitting Smoking: An Electronic Diary Study

    Danielle E. McCarthy;Thomas M. Piasecki;Michael C. Fiore;Timothy B. Baker

  • Smoking withdrawal dynamics: I. Abstinence distress in lapsers and abstainers.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Douglas E. Jorenby;Stevens S. Smith;Michael C. Fiore

  • Smoking withdrawal dynamics: II. Improved tests of withdrawal-relapse relations.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Douglas E. Jorenby;Stevens S. Smith;Michael C. Fiore

  • Development and initial validation of the Hangover Symptoms Scale: prevalence and correlates of Hangover Symptoms in college students.

    Wendy S. Slutske;Thomas M. Piasecki;Erin E. Hunt-Carter

  • Listening to Nicotine: Negative Affect and the Smoking Withdrawal Conundrum

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Susan L. Kenford;Stevens S. Smith;Michael C Fiore

  • Self-monitored motives for smoking among college students.

    Thomas M. Piasecki;Alison E. Richardson;Shawn M. Smith

  • Strike while the iron is hot: can stepped-care treatments resurrect relapsing smokers?

    Stevens S. Smith;Douglas E. Jorenby;Michael C. Fiore;Jane E. Anderson

  • Psychological mediators of bupropion sustained-release treatment for smoking cessation.

    Danielle E. McCarthy;Thomas M. Piasecki;Daniel L. Lawrence;Douglas E. Jorenby

  • Affect and alcohol use: an ecological momentary assessment study of outpatients with borderline personality disorder.

    Seungmin Jahng;Marika B. Solhan;Rachel L. Tomko;Phillip K. Wood

  • Reasons for Abstaining or Limiting Drinking: A Developmental Perspective

    Amee J. Epler;Kenneth J. Sher;Thomas M. Piasecki

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy B. Baker
Timothy B. Baker University of Wisconsin–Madison
Kenneth J. Sher
Kenneth J. Sher University of Missouri
Wendy S. Slutske
Wendy S. Slutske University of Missouri
Michael C. Fiore
Michael C. Fiore University of Wisconsin–Madison
Phillip K. Wood
Phillip K. Wood University of Missouri
Saul Shiffman
Saul Shiffman University of Pittsburgh
Andrew C. Heath
Andrew C. Heath Washington University in St. Louis
Bruce D. Bartholow
Bruce D. Bartholow University of Missouri
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of fulfilling career pathways, including Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). With the rise of accredited online programs, students can now complete the necessary coursework and clinical requirements more flexibly. However, it is important to note that MFT education and licensure requirements vary by location.

For instance, if you are interested in mft requirements in Toledo, you’ll find specific course, practicum, and licensing procedures. These differ from the Tucson mft education requirements, where local state regulations influence the process.

Similarly, those pursuing an MFT career in Tulsa should review the Tulsa mft education requirements for guidance on supervised experience and testing. Meanwhile, students considering practice in Virginia Beach should be aware of the Virginia Beach mft certification requirements for correct compliance.

When choosing your degree path, make sure your online program is properly accredited and aligns with the requirements of the state where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Piasecki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles