World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4914 4555 49 47 170 15977

Jürgen Barth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jürgen Barth between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jürgen Barth published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2021. 13 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2021. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 4 publications
1995 2025

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jürgen Barth: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 10
2006 3
2007 5
2008 7
2009 12
2010 7
2011 13
2012 10
2013 14
2014 12
2015 12
2016 7
2017 18
2018 13
2019 14
2020 6
2021 19
2022 16
2023 8
2024 9
2025 4
Total 229
Download as CSV

Jürgen Barth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Barth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 170 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 170
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jürgen Barth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jürgen Barth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jürgen Barth is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including clinical psychology, general health professions, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, applied psychology, and complementary and alternative medicine.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, such as cardiac health and mental health, digital mental health interventions, posttraumatic stress disorder research, mobile health and mHealth applications, complementary and alternative medicine studies, pain management and placebo effect, and resilience and mental health.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Recommendations for the development, implementation, and reporting of control interventions in efficacy and mechanistic trials of physical, psychological, and self-management therapies: the CoPPS Statement, 2023, BMJ
  • Long-term outcomes of psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Psychological Medicine
  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for post-traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2021, Evidence-Based Mental Health
  • Current State of Research About Chinese Herbal Medicines (CHM) for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Scoping Review, 2020, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jürgen Barth include Claudia M. Witt, Roland von Känel, Mary Princip, Ulrich Schnyder, and Jean-Paul Schmid.

The scientist has published notably in venues such as PLoS ONE, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Journal of Clinical Medicine, Psychological Medicine, and JMIR Cancer.

Best Publications

  • Depression as a risk factor for mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis.

    Jürgen Barth;Martina Schumacher;Christoph Herrmann-Lingen

  • Comparative Efficacy of Seven Psychotherapeutic Interventions for Patients with Depression: A Network Meta-Analysis

    Jürgen Barth;Thomas Munder;Heike Gerger;Eveline Nüesch;Eveline Nüesch

  • From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.

    Laila Burla;Birte Knierim;Jurgen Barth;Katharina Liewald

  • Lack of social support in the etiology and the prognosis of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jürgen Barth;Sarah Schneider;Roland von Känel

  • Working Alliance Inventory‐Short Revised (WAI‐SR): psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients

    Unknown

  • The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression : A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Ellen Driessen;Steven D. Hollon;Patricia van Oppen

  • Efficacy of Psychological Interventions for Sexual Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Sarah Elisabeth Frühauf;Heike Gerger;Hannah Maren Schmidt;Thomas Munder

  • Loneliness is adversely associated with physical and mental health and lifestyle factors: Results from a Swiss national survey.

    Aline Richard;Sabine Rohrmann;Caroline L. Vandeleur;Margareta Schmid

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for depression in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Xinyu Zhou;Sarah E Hetrick;Pim Cuijpers;Bin Qin

  • Efficacy of communication skills training courses in oncology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J. Barth;P. Lannen

  • Psychiatric Disorders in Refugees and Internally Displaced Persons After Forced Displacement: A Systematic Review

    Naser Morina;Aemal Akhtar;Jürgen Barth;Ulrich Schnyder

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Xinyu Zhou;Teng Teng;Yuqing Zhang;Cinzia Del Giovane

  • The efficacy of psychological interventions for infertile patients: a meta-analysis examining mental health and pregnancy rate

    Katja Hämmerli;Hansjörg Znoj;Jürgen Barth

  • Efficacy of hypnosis in adults undergoing surgery or medical procedures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    S. Tefikow;J. Barth;S. Maichrowitz;A. Beelmann

  • Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews

    Thomas Munder;Oliver Brütsch;Rainer Leonhart;Heike Gerger

  • Comparative efficacy of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in fibromyalgia syndrome: network meta-analysis

    Eveline Nüesch;Winfried Häuser;Kathrin Bernardy;Kathrin Bernardy;Jürgen Barth

  • Association between type D personality and prognosis in patients with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Gesine Grande;Matthias Romppel;Jürgen Barth

  • Internet information and medical consultations: Experiences from patients’ and physicians’ perspectives

    Kathrin Sommerhalder;Andrea Abraham;Maria Caiata Zufferey;Jürgen Barth

  • Communication skills training in oncology: a position paper based on a consensus meeting among European experts in 2009

    F. Stiefel;J. Barth;J. Bensing;L.J Fallowfield

  • Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Treating Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Dennis Anheyer;Heidemarie Haller;Jürgen Barth;Romy Lauche

  • Psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease

    Jürgen Barth;Julia A Critchley;Jürgen Bengel

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland von Känel
Roland von Känel University of Zurich
Ulrich Schnyder
Ulrich Schnyder University of Zurich
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gregor Domes
Gregor Domes University of Trier
John R. Weisz
John R. Weisz Harvard University
Martin Härter
Martin Härter Universität Hamburg
Peng Xie
Peng Xie Chongqing Medical University
Bernhard Strauss
Bernhard Strauss Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Andrea Cipriani
Andrea Cipriani University of Oxford
Peter Jüni
Peter Jüni University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree opens doors to a variety of dynamic career paths in mental health, research, and organizational development. Flexible learning options allow students to balance studies with personal and professional commitments without sacrificing educational quality. You can explore online psychology degrees that provide foundational and advanced knowledge, preparing you for roles in counseling, research, human resources, and more.

If you are interested in the intersection of psychology and the legal system, consider forensic psychology master's programs online. These specialized degrees equip graduates for careers in criminal justice, corrections, and law enforcement. For those drawn to workplace psychology, organizational psychology masters online help you understand employee behavior and drive organizational success.

Ambitious professionals aiming for clinical practice or advanced research may pursue apa accredited online psyd programs. These programs focus on practical skills and clinical expertise, preparing graduates for licensure and leadership roles within the mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Jürgen Barth

Trending Scientists