World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
6238
World Ranking
7743
National Ranking
2756

Simon Wing publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Wing sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Simon Wing D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Wing sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Simon Wing is affiliated with the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans primarily the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a particular focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics. Within this broad area, they have contributed extensively to studies on ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, solar and space plasma dynamics, and geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies. Other research topics include astro and planetary science, earthquake detection and analysis, atmospheric ozone and climate, and global energy and sustainability research.

Wing has a significant publication record, having authored research articles featured notably in these venues:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Space Weather
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Wing are:

  • "Untangling the Solar Wind and Magnetospheric Drivers of the Radiation Belt Electrons" (2022), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • "Complex Systems Methods Characterizing Nonlinear Processes in the Near-Earth Electromagnetic Environment: Recent Advances and Open Challenges" (2023), published in Space Science Reviews
  • "Field-Aligned Currents in Auroral Vortices" (2020), published in Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • "Periodic Narrowband Radio Wave Emissions and Inward Plasma Transport at Saturn's Magnetosphere" (2020), published in The Astronomical Journal
  • "Information Theoretical Approach to Understanding Flare Waiting Times" (2020), published in The Astrophysical Journal

Frequent collaborators in Wing's research include J. R. Johnson, Xuanye Ma, P. A. Delamere, K. Nykyri, and P. A. Damiano. Collaboration with these researchers spans multiple publications, indicating ongoing scientific partnerships.

The main focus of Wing's work is the dynamics of near-Earth space environments, including the complex interactions between solar wind, magnetospheric processes, and radiation belt behavior. Their studies often address nonlinear processes and plasma transport mechanisms relevant to space physics and planetary magnetospheres.

Best Publications

  • A new magnetic coordinate system for conjugate studies at high latitudes

    K. B. Baker;S. Wing

  • Diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora: The global precipitation budget

    P. T. Newell;T. Sotirelis;S. Wing

  • Seasonal variations in diffuse, monoenergetic, and broadband aurora

    Patrick T. Newell;Thomas Sotirelis;Simon Wing

  • Central plasma sheet ion properties as inferred from ionospheric observations

    Simon Wing;Patrick T. Newell

  • The auroral oval position, structure, and intensity of precipitation from 1984 onward: An automated on-line data base

    Patrick T. Newell;Simon Wing;Ching-I. Meng;Vincent Sigillito

  • Kp forecast models

    S. Wing;J. R. Johnson;J. Jen;C.-I. Meng

  • Characterizing the state of the magnetosphere: Testing the ion precipitation maxima latitude (b2i) and the ion isotropy boundary

    Patrick T. Newell;V. A. Sergeev;G. R. Bikkuzina;S. Wing

  • Kelvin Helmholtz Instability in Planetary Magnetospheres

    Jay R. Johnson;Simon Wing;Peter A. Delamere

  • Dawn‐dusk asymmetries, ion spectra, and sources in the northward interplanetary magnetic field plasma sheet

    S. Wing;J. R. Johnson;P. T. Newell;C.-I. Meng

  • Double cusp: Model prediction and observational verification

    Simon Wing;Patrick T. Newell;J. Michael Ruohoniemi

  • Magnetic dipolarization with substorm expansion onset

    K. Liou;C.-I. Meng;A. T. Y. Lui;P. T. Newell

  • Dawn–dusk asymmetries in the coupled solar wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere system: a review

    Andrew P. Walsh;Stein Haaland;Colin Forsyth;Amy M. Keesee

  • 2D plasma sheet ion density and temperature profiles for northward and southward IMF

    Simon Wing;Patrick T. Newell

  • Review of Solar Wind Entry into and Transport Within the Plasma Sheet

    S. Wing;J. R. Johnson;C. C. Chaston;C. C. Chaston;M. Echim

  • Global cooling and densification of the plasma sheet during an extended period of purely northward IMF on October 22–24, 2003

    M. Øieroset;J. Raeder;T. D. Phan;S. Wing

  • Information theoretical approach to discovering solar wind drivers of the outer radiation belt

    Simon Wing;Jay R. Johnson;Jay R. Johnson;Enrico Camporeale;Geoffrey D. Reeves

  • A large statistical study of the entry of interplanetary magnetic field Y-component into the magnetosphere

    S. Wing;P. T. Newell;D. G. Sibeck;K. B. Baker

  • Auroral particle precipitation characterized by the substorm cycle

    Simon Wing;Matina Gkioulidou;Jay R. Johnson;Patrick T. Newell

  • Effects of interplanetary magnetic field z component and the solar wind dynamic pressure on the geosynchronous magnetic field

    Simon Wing;David G. Sibeck

  • Imaging Plasma Density Structures in the Soft X-Rays Generated by Solar Wind Charge Exchange with Neutrals

    David G. Sibeck;R. Allen;Homayon Aryan;Dennis Bodewits

  • Dawn-dusk asymmetries in the coupled Solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere system

    A. P. Walsh;S. Haaland;C. Forsyth;A. M. Keesee

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick T. Newell
Patrick T. Newell Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Shinichi Ohtani
Shinichi Ohtani Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Kan Liou
Kan Liou Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Jesper Gjerloev
Jesper Gjerloev Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
David G. Sibeck
David G. Sibeck Goddard Space Flight Center
Yongliang Zhang
Yongliang Zhang Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Joachim Raeder
Joachim Raeder University of New Hampshire
J. M. Ruohoniemi
J. M. Ruohoniemi Virginia Tech
C.-I. Meng
C.-I. Meng Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Stephen A. Billings
Stephen A. Billings University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse fields such as geology, geographic information systems (GIS), and public administration. For students seeking degree options that balance academic rigor with accessibility, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify manageable pathways while still building valuable skills.

For those interested in earth sciences, pursuing one of the best online geology degree programs offers a flexible way to specialize in geology without compromising career prospects. Similarly, the rise of technology in environmental work makes GIS expertise highly relevant; therefore, considering the best GIS graduate programs can lead to advanced opportunities in spatial analysis and environmental planning.

Additionally, careers in environmental policy and management often benefit from public administration knowledge. Candidates might explore the easiest online MPA programs to gain leadership skills through accelerated or part-time formats, enhancing their qualifications for government or nonprofit roles.

By combining environmental science foundations with these related disciplines, students can tailor their education to suit their interests, strengths, and career goals, paving the way for impactful professions in sustainability, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Simon Wing

Trending Scientists