World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
57
Citations
12250
World Ranking
2254
National Ranking
244

Mark Lester publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lester sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 499 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Mark Lester D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lester sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Lester is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily lies within the fields of Physics and Astronomy, focusing on subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, and Atmospheric Science.

The scientist's work extensively covers several key topics:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

Mark Lester has published in a range of scientific venues with notable frequency. The principal publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Annales Geophysicae
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

The recent publications of Mark Lester reflect a diverse research interest in atmospheric and space physics phenomena. Some of these are:

  • Interhemispheric differences of mesosphere-lower thermosphere winds and tides investigated from three whole-atmosphere models and meteor radar observations, 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Mars' Ionopause: A Matter of Pressures, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Atmospheric tomography using the Nordic Meteor Radar Cluster and Chilean Observation Network De Meteor Radars: network details and 3D-Var retrieval, 2021, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Vertical Structure of the Arctic Spring Transition in the Middle Atmosphere, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Coupling From the Middle Atmosphere to the Exobase: Dynamical Disturbance Effects on Light Chemical Species, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Alexander Kozlovsky
  • Beatriz Sánchez-Cano
  • Johan Kero
  • Gunter Stober
  • Masaki Tsutsumi

Best Publications

  • A decade of the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): scientific achievements, new techniques and future directions

    G. Chisham;M. Lester;Steve E. Milan;M.P. Freeman

  • Substorm Current Wedge Revisited

    Larry. Kepko;R. L. McPherron;O. Amm;S. Apatenkov

  • Variations in the polar cap area during two substorm cycles

    Steve E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;K. Oksavik

  • Review of the accomplishments of mid-latitude Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) HF radars

    Nozomu Nishitani;John Michael Ruohoniemi;Mark Lester;Joseph Benjamin Harold Baker

  • Global energy deposition during the January 1997 magnetic cloud event

    G. Lu;D. N. Baker;R. L. McPherron;Charlie J. Farrugia

  • Initial backscatter occurrence statistics from the CUTLASS HF radars

    S. E. Milan;T. K. Yeoman;M. Lester;E. C. Thomas

  • Convection and auroral response to a southward turning of the IMF : Polar UVI, CUTLASS, and IMAGE signatures of transient magnetic flux transfer at the magnetopause

    S. E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;M. Brittnacher

  • Polarization patterns of Pi 2 magnetic pulsations and the substorm current wedge

    Mark Lester;Jeffrey W. Hughes;Howard J. Singer

  • Evolution and characteristics of global Pc5 ULF waves during a high solar wind speed interval

    I. J. Rae;E. F. Donovan;I. R. Mann;F. R. Fenrich

  • Interplanetary coronal mass ejection observed at STEREO-A, Mars, comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, Saturn, and New Horizons en route to Pluto: Comparison of its Forbush decreases at 1.4, 3.1, and 9.9 AU

    Olivier Witasse;Beatriz Sánchez-Cano;M. L. Mays;P. Kajdič

  • On the importance of interplanetary magnetic field B on polar cap patch formation

    Q-H. Zhang;B-C. Zhang;R-Y. Liu;H-G. Yang

  • Two substorm intensifications compared: Onset, expansion, and global consequences

    Tuija Pulkkinen;D. N. Baker;L. A. Frank;J. B. Sigwarth

  • Meridian-scanning photometer, coherent HF radar, and magnetometer observations of the cusp: a case study

    S. E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;J. Moen

  • Dayside convection and auroral morphology during an interval of northward interplanetary magnetic field

    S. E. Milan;M. Lester;S. W. H. Cowley;M. Brittnacher

  • On the importance of interplanetary magnetic field ∣By∣ on polar cap patch formation

    Q.-H. Zhang;B.-C. Zhang;R.-Y. Liu;M. W. Dunlop

  • First simultaneous observations of flux transfer events at the high-latitude magnetopause by the Cluster spacecraft and pulsed radar signatures in the conjugate ionosphere by the CUTLASS and EISCAT radars

    J. A. Wild;Stanley William Herbert Cowley;J. A. Davies;H. Khan

  • Stereo CUTLASS - A new capability for the SuperDARN HF radars

    M. Lester;P. J. Chapman;S. W. H. Cowley;S. J. Crooks

  • Response of the magnetotail to changes in the open flux content of the magnetosphere

    Steve E. Milan;S. W. H. Cowley;M. Lester;D. M. Wright

  • First in‐situ measurements of HF radar echoing targets

    J. Moen;J. Moen;K. Oksavik;K. Oksavik;T. Abe;Mark Lester

  • In situ measurements of plasma irregularity growth in the cusp ionosphere

    K. Oksavik;J. Moen;J. Moen;M. Lester;T. A. Bekkeng

  • LONGITUDINAL STRUCTURE IN PI-2 PULSATIONS AND THE SUBSTORM CURRENT WEDGE

    Mark Lester;W. Jeffrey Hughes;Howard J. Singer

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve E. Milan
Steve E. Milan University of Leicester
Tim K. Yeoman
Tim K. Yeoman University of Leicester
Stanley W. H. Cowley
Stanley W. H. Cowley University of Leicester
Jøran Moen
Jøran Moen University of Oslo
Mike Lockwood
Mike Lockwood University of Reading
Adrian Grocott
Adrian Grocott Lancaster University
Olivier Witasse
Olivier Witasse European Space Research and Technology Centre
Kjellmar Oksavik
Kjellmar Oksavik University of Bergen
Per Even Sandholt
Per Even Sandholt University of Oslo
R. A. Greenwald
R. A. Greenwald Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Earth Science, several online degree programs offer complementary skills and career opportunities. For example, pursuing mlis ala accredited programs can prepare graduates for specialized roles in managing scientific and environmental information within library and archival settings.

Understanding what is library science opens doors to careers that involve curating and disseminating Earth Science literature and data. This knowledge supports research and education in environmental fields.

Additionally, degrees in photography, especially online options like photography degrees online, enable students to document natural landscapes and geological phenomena effectively, combining technical and creative skills.

Veterans interested in such fields can find specialized support through the best military friendly online photography degrees, which offer flexible and affordable pathways to develop valuable expertise aligned with Earth Science careers.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Lester

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles