World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7870
World Ranking
8776
National Ranking
532

Bruce Edmonds publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Edmonds sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 189 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bruce Edmonds D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Edmonds sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce Edmonds is affiliated with Manchester Metropolitan University in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans across the fields of Computer Science, Social Sciences, and Decision Sciences, with a notable focus on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their research topics cover areas such as Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation, Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence, Complex Systems and Decision Making, Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, Cognitive Science and Mapping, and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis.

Bruce Edmonds has contributed to multiple publication venues. Frequent journals include:

  • Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
  • International Journal of Social Research Methodology
  • Environmental Modelling & Software
  • IEEE Access
  • Government and Opposition

Recent papers associated with their field comprise:

  • "The ODD Protocol for Describing Agent-Based and Other Simulation Models: A Second Update to Improve Clarity, Replication, and Structural Realism" (2020), Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
  • "Computational Models That Matter During a Global Pandemic Outbreak: A Call to Action" (2020), Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
  • "What do you want theory for? - A pragmatic analysis of the roles of "theory" in agent-based modelling" (2023), Environmental Modelling & Software
  • "A Semantic and Syntactic Similarity Measure for Political Tweets" (2020), IEEE Access
  • "An introduction to the themed section on 'Using agent-based simulation for integrating qualitative and quantitative evidence'" (2022), International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Bruce Edmonds frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include:

  • Gary Polhill
  • Patrycja Antosz
  • Edmund Chattoe-Brown
  • Melania Borit
  • Harko Verhagen

Best Publications

  • The ODD protocol for describing agent-based and other simulation models: A second update to improve clarity, replication, and structural realism

    Volker Grimm;Steven F. Railsback;Christian E. Vincenot;Uta Berger

  • From KISS to KIDS : An 'anti-simplistic' modelling approach

    Bruce Edmonds;Scott Moss

  • What is Complexity? - The philosophy of complexity per se with application to some examples in evolution

    Bruce Edmonds

  • Syntactic Measures of Complexity

    Bruce Edmonds

  • Sociology and simulation : Statistical and qualitative cross-validation

    Scott Moss;Bruce Edmonds

  • Errors and Artefacts in Agent-Based Modelling

    José Manuel Galán;Luis R. Izquierdo;Segismundo S. Izquierdo;José Ignacio Santos

  • Replication, Replication and Replication: Some Hard Lessons from Model Alignment

    Bruce Edmonds;David Hales

  • Different Modelling Purposes

    Bruce Edmonds;Christophe Le Page;Mike Bithell;Edmund Chattoe-Brown

  • Computational models that matter during a global pandemic outbreak: A call to action

    Flaminio Squazzoni;J. Gareth Polhill;Bruce Edmonds;Petra Ahrweiler

  • Socially Intelligent Agents: Creating Relationships With Computers And Robots

    Kerstin Dautenhahn;Lola Cantildeamero;Bruce Edmonds;Alan H. Bond

  • A conversational intelligent tutoring system to automatically predict learning styles

    Annabel Latham;Keeley Crockett;David McLean;Bruce Edmonds

  • Sociology and Social Theory in Agent Based Social Simulation: A Symposium

    Rosaria Conte;Bruce Edmonds;Scott Moss;R. Keith Sawyer

  • Simulating Social Complexity

    Bruce Edmonds;Ruth Meyer

  • SDML: A Multi-Agent Language for Organizational Modelling

    Scott Moss;Helen Gaylard;Steve Wallis;Bruce Edmonds

  • Model-to-Model Analysis

    David Hales;Juliette Rouchier;Bruce Edmonds

  • Different Modelling Purposes.

    Bruce Edmonds

  • Applying a socially inspired technique (tags) to improve cooperation in P2P networks

    D. Hales;B. Edmonds

  • Towards good social science

    Scott Moss;Bruce Edmonds

  • The Use of Models - Making MABS More Informative

    Bruce Edmonds

  • Social Simulation in the Social Sciences: A Brief Overview

    Flaminio Squazzoni;Wander Jager;Bruce Edmonds

  • Computational modelling for decision-making: where, why, what, who and how

    Muffy Calder;Claire Craig;Dave Culley;Richard de Cani

  • Social Intelligence

    Bruce Edmonds;Kerstin Dautenhahn

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel Gilbert
Nigel Gilbert University of Surrey
Frank Dignum
Frank Dignum Umeå University
Carlos Gershenson
Carlos Gershenson Binghamton University
Alan J. McKane
Alan J. McKane University of Manchester
Paul Lukowicz
Paul Lukowicz German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
Dirk Helbing
Dirk Helbing ETH Zurich
Rosaria Conte
Rosaria Conte National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Wander Jager
Wander Jager University of Groningen
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Kerstin Dautenhahn University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth exploring the many online degree and certification paths available. Modern career progression often requires flexibility, and digital learning options cater to a wide range of professional goals.

For students hoping to boost employability quickly, certifications that pay well can be a smart, focused way to enter the tech job market or to specialize in a high-demand area. These programs are often shorter and more affordable than traditional degrees.

Those seeking accelerated advanced credentials may consider quick masters degrees online. These options allow professionals to develop specialized skills without putting their careers on hold for years.

It’s also important to choose programs that offer a high return on investment. Find out which masters degrees that are worth it, ensuring your effort leads to meaningful, long-term career growth.

If you’re just starting out, 1 year associate degree programs online make it possible to quickly gain foundational knowledge and start building practical tech skills. Whatever your path, there are flexible online options to fit your ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce Edmonds

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles