World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
31
Citations
10622
World Ranking
3250
National Ranking
47

CV Clemens Verhoosel publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where CV Clemens Verhoosel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 111 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

CV Clemens Verhoosel D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where CV Clemens Verhoosel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

CV Clemens Verhoosel is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily contributes to the field of Engineering, with a focus on Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, and Mechanical Engineering.

Their work covers a number of specialized topics including Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques, Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics, Numerical Methods in Engineering, Composite Material Mechanics, Elasticity and Material Modeling, Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques, and Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design.

Verhoosel has authored publications in various scientific venues, frequently publishing in arXiv (Cornell University), Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, SSRN Electronic Journal, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, and Computational Geosciences.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Stability and Conditioning of Immersed Finite Element Methods: Analysis and Remedies (2023) - Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering
  • A staggered finite element procedure for the coupled Stokes-Biot system with fluid entry resistance (2020) - Computational Geosciences
  • Critical time-step size analysis and mass scaling by ghost-penalty for immersogeometric explicit dynamics (2023) - Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • An isogeometric analysis framework for ventricular cardiac mechanics (2023) - Computational Mechanics
  • Residual-based error estimation and adaptivity for stabilized immersed isogeometric analysis using truncated hierarchical B-splines (2022) - Journal of Mechanics

Verhoosel has collaborated extensively with several researchers. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • E. H. van Brummelen (15 joint publications)
  • Frits de Prenter (10 joint publications)
  • Sai C. Divi (8 joint publications)
  • Robin Willems (8 joint publications)
  • O. van der Sluis (7 joint publications)

In addition to journal publications, Verhoosel has contributed to book publications through Springer Nature with a work titled Isogeometric Analysis and Applications 2018 released in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures

    de R. Borst;M.A. Crisfield;J.J.C. Remmers;C.V. Verhoosel

  • A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture

    Michael J. Borden;Clemens V. Verhoosel;Michael A. Scott;Thomas J.R. Hughes

  • A higher-order phase-field model for brittle fracture: Formulation and analysis within the isogeometric analysis framework

    Michael J. Borden;Thomas J Hughes;Chad Matthew Landis;Clemens V. Verhoosel

  • Isogeometric finite element data structures based on Bézier extraction of T-splines

    Michael A. Scott;Michael J. Borden;Michael J. Borden;Clemens V. Verhoosel;Thomas W. Sederberg

  • Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures: de Borst/Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures

    René de Borst;Mike A. Crisfield;Joris J. C. Remmers;Clemens V. Verhoosel

  • A phase-field model for cohesive fracture

    CV Clemens Verhoosel;de R René Borst

  • Gradient damage vs phase-field approaches for fracture: Similarities and differences

    R René de Borst;CV Clemens Verhoosel

  • An isogeometric analysis approach to gradient damage models

    Clemens V. Verhoosel;Clemens V. Verhoosel;Michael A. Scott;Thomas J. R. Hughes;René de Borst

  • An isogeometric approach to cohesive zone modeling

    Clemens V. Verhoosel;Clemens V. Verhoosel;Michael A. Scott;René de Borst;Thomas J. R. Hughes

  • A dissipation-based arc-length method for robust simulation of brittle and ductile failure

    CV Clemens Verhoosel;Jjc Joris Remmers;MA Miguel Gutiérrez

  • Phase-field models for brittle and cohesive fracture

    Julien Vignollet;Stefan May;René de Borst;Clemens V. Verhoosel

  • Condition number analysis and preconditioning of the finite cell method

    F. de Prenter;C.V. Verhoosel;G.J. van Zwieten;E.H. van Brummelen

  • Computational homogenization for adhesive and cohesive failure in quasi-brittle solids

    Clemens V. Verhoosel;Joris J. C. Remmers;Miguel A. Gutiérrez;René de Borst

  • Image-based goal-oriented adaptive isogeometric analysis with application to the micro-mechanical modeling of trabecular bone

    CV Clemens Verhoosel;van Gj GertJan Zwieten;van B Bert Rietbergen;de R René Borst

  • An isogeometric solid-like shell element for non-linear analysis

    S Saman Hosseini;Jjc Joris Remmers;CV Clemens Verhoosel;R René de Borst

  • An isogeometric continuum shell element for non-linear analysis

    S Saman Hosseini;Jjc Joris Remmers;CV Clemens Verhoosel;de R René Borst

  • A fracture-controlled path-following technique for phase-field modeling of brittle fracture

    N. Singh;C.V. Verhoosel;R. de Borst;E.H. van Brummelen

  • Goal-adaptive Isogeometric Analysis with hierarchical splines

    G Göktürk Kuru;CV Clemens Verhoosel;van der Kg Kristoffer Zee;van Eh Harald Brummelen

  • Numerical homogenization of cracking processes in thin fibre-epoxy layers

    MV Cid Alfaro;Asj Akke Suiker;CV Clemens Verhoosel;de R René Borst

  • Iterative solution of the random eigenvalue problem with application to spectral stochastic finite element systems

    CV Clemens Verhoosel;MA Miguel Gutiérrez;SJ Steven Hulshoff

  • Stability and Conditioning of Immersed Finite Element Methods: Analysis and Remedies

    Unknown

  • Non‐linear Finite Element Analysis

    René de Borst;Mike A. Crisfield;Joris J. C. Remmers;Clemens V. Verhoosel

  • Modelling inter- and transgranular fracture in piezoelectric polycrystals

    CV Clemens Verhoosel;MA Miguel Gutiérrez

  • Preconditioning immersed isogeometric finite element methods with application to flow problems

    F. de Prenter;C.V. Verhoosel;E.H. van Brummelen

  • An isogeometric analysis Bézier interface element for mechanical and poromechanical fracture problems

    F Faisal Irzal;Jjc Joris Remmers;CV Clemens Verhoosel;de R René Borst

  • Isogeometric finite element analysis of poroelasticity

    F Faisal Irzal;Jjc Joris Remmers;CV Clemens Verhoosel;de R René Borst

Frequent Co-Authors

René de Borst
René de Borst University of Sheffield
Alessandro Reali
Alessandro Reali University of Pavia
Thomas J. R. Hughes
Thomas J. R. Hughes The University of Texas at Austin
Patrick Anderson
Patrick Anderson Eindhoven University of Technology
Ferdinando Auricchio
Ferdinando Auricchio University of Pavia
Mgd Marc Geers
Mgd Marc Geers Eindhoven University of Technology
Ernst Rank
Ernst Rank Technical University of Munich
Chad M. Landis
Chad M. Landis The University of Texas at Austin
Kurt Maute
Kurt Maute University of Colorado Boulder
Alan Needleman
Alan Needleman Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broader engineering or technical disciplines, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. While Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering provide a strong foundation, fields like speech-language pathology and audiology also offer promising career paths that emphasize healthcare technology and patient interaction.

Prospective students may want to review the slp grad school requirements to understand the academic and admission standards in this healthcare niche. Additionally, identifying the easiest audiology programs to get into can help applicants find accessible entry points into the audiology profession.

Cost considerations are crucial, especially for online learning options. Checking online program fees is essential, and this article on online speech pathology degree costs and fees provides a comprehensive overview to help budget your education.

Veterans looking to pursue technical or healthcare-related careers should consider military-friendly options. The guide to the best military friendly online speech pathology degrees highlights programs that offer tailored support and benefits for service members transitioning to civilian careers.

Best Scientists Citing CV Clemens Verhoosel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles