World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gerlinde A. S. Metz

Gerlinde A. S. Metz

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 56 4495 4129 258 235 178 12391

Gerlinde A. S. Metz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerlinde A. S. Metz between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerlinde A. S. Metz published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2019. 24 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2019. 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 13 publications
1998 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerlinde A. S. Metz: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 5
1999 0
2000 5
2001 5
2002 4
2003 2
2004 5
2005 4
2006 4
2007 4
2008 5
2009 8
2010 6
2011 8
2012 8
2013 10
2014 7
2015 4
2016 12
2017 13
2018 11
2019 15
2020 9
2021 15
2022 13
2023 15
2024 11
2025 13
Total 221
Download as CSV

Gerlinde A. S. Metz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerlinde A. S. Metz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350 178
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Gerlinde A. S. Metz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerlinde A. S. Metz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357 56
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Gerlinde A. S. Metz is affiliated with the University of Lethbridge in Canada. Their research spans several interconnected fields within medicine and neuroscience, with a focus on pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, as well as behavioral neuroscience and molecular biology. The scientist's work contributes to understanding mechanisms related to birth, development, and health.

Their research interests cover multiple main topics, including:

  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism

Gerlinde Metz has published extensively in various scientific venues. The most frequent venues of publication include:

  • Metabolites
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Current Zoology

Collaborations have been important in Metz's career, with recurring co-authors being:

  • Jamshid Faraji
  • Tony Montina
  • David M. Olson
  • Mirela Ambeskovic
  • Nasrin Soltanpour

Recent representative papers include:

  • "Climate change is a major stressor causing poor pregnancy outcomes and child development," 2020, published in F1000Research
  • "Prenatal Maternal Stress Causes Preterm Birth and Affects Neonatal Adaptive Immunity in Mice," 2020, published in Frontiers in Immunology
  • "Aging, Social Distancing, and COVID-19 Risk: Who is more Vulnerable and Why?", 2021, published in Aging and Disease
  • "Cardiorenal metabolic biomarkers link early life stress to risk of non-communicable diseases and adverse mental health outcomes," 2020, published in Scientific Reports
  • "Metabolic dysfunction in pregnancy: Fingerprinting the maternal metabolome using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy," 2020, published in Endocrinology Diabetes & Metabolism

The main fields of study for Metz include Medicine, with 71 publications, and Neuroscience, with 33 publications. Subfields strongly represented are pediatrics, perinatology, and child health; behavioral neuroscience; molecular biology; social psychology; and physiology, which reflects the interdisciplinary nature of their investigations.

Best Publications

  • Cortical and subcortical lesions impair skilled walking in the ladder rung walking test: a new task to evaluate fore- and hindlimb stepping, placing, and co-ordination.

    Gerlinde A Metz;Ian Q Whishaw

  • Stress-induced perinatal and transgenerational epigenetic programming of brain development and mental health.

    Olena Babenko;Igor Kovalchuk;Gerlinde A.S. Metz

  • Enriched childhood experiences moderate age-related motor and cognitive decline

    Megan J. Metzler;Deborah M. Saucier;Gerlinde A. S. Metz

  • Neurite growth inhibitors restrict plasticity and functional recovery following corticospinal tract lesions.

    Michaela Thallmair;Gerlinde A. S. Metz;Werner J. Z'Graggen;Olivier Raineteau

  • Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury.

    Gerlinde A.S. Metz;Armin Curt;Henk van de Meent;Isabel Klusman

  • Locomotor Recovery in Spinal Cord-Injured Rats Treated with an Antibody Neutralizing the Myelin-Associated Neurite Growth Inhibitor Nogo-A

    Doron Merkler;Gerlinde A. S. Metz;Olivier Raineteau;Volker Dietz

  • Efficient testing of motor function in spinal cord injured rats

    Gerlinde A.S. Metz;Doron Merkler;Volker Dietz;Martin E. Schwab

  • Functional recovery and enhanced corticofugal plasticity after unilateral pyramidal tract lesion and blockade of myelin-associated neurite growth inhibitors in adult rats.

    Werner J. Z’Graggen;Gerlinde A. S. Metz;Gwendolyn L. Kartje;Michaela Thallmair

  • The ladder rung walking task: a scoring system and its practical application.

    Gerlinde A S Metz;Ian Q. Whishaw

  • Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery.

    J. Girgis;D. Merrett;S. Kirkland;G. A. S. Metz

  • Prenatal stress and epigenetics

    L Cao-Lei;S R de Rooij;S King;S G Matthews

  • Maternal stress induces epigenetic signatures of psychiatric and neurological diseases in the offspring.

    Fabiola C. R. Zucchi;Youli Yao;Isaac D. Ward;Yaroslav Ilnytskyy

  • Modulation of motor function by stress: a novel concept of the effects of stress and corticosterone on behavior.

    Gerlinde A. Metz;Nafisa M. Jadavji;Lori K. Smith

  • Skilled reaching an action pattern: stability in rat (Rattus norvegicus) grasping movements as a function of changing food pellet size

    Gerlinde A.S Metz;Ian Q Whishaw

  • Treadmill training in incomplete spinal cord injured rats

    Karim Fouad;Gerlinde A.S Metz;Doron Merkler;Volker Dietz

  • Ancestral exposure to stress epigenetically programs preterm birth risk and adverse maternal and newborn outcomes

    Youli Yao;Alexandra M. Robinson;Fabiola C. R. Zucchi;Jerrah C. Robbins

  • Impairment of pronation, supination, and body co-ordination in reach-to-grasp tasks in human Parkinson's disease (PD) reveals homology to deficits in animal models.

    Ian Q Whishaw;Oksana Suchowersky;Oksana Suchowersky;Leigh Davis;Justyna Sarna

  • Stress accelerates neural degeneration and exaggerates motor symptoms in a rat model of Parkinson's disease

    Lori K. Smith;Nafisa M. Jadavji;Keri L. Colwell;S. Katrina Perehudoff

  • Maternal circulating leukocytes display early chemotactic responsiveness during late gestation

    Nardhy Gomez-Lopez;Nardhy Gomez-Lopez;Satomi Tanaka;Zoya Zaeem;Gerlinde A. S. Metz

  • Accelerated nervous system development contributes to behavioral efficiency in the laboratory mouse: a behavioral review and theoretical proposal.

    Ian Q. Whishaw;Gerlinde A. S. Metz;Bryan Kolb;Sergio M. Pellis

  • Regeneration and sprouting of chronically injured corticospinal tract fibers in adult rats promoted by NT-3 and the mAb IN-1, which neutralizes myelin-associated neurite growth inhibitors

    J. Von Meyenburg;C. Brösamle;G. A. S. Metz;M. E. Schwab

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Q. Whishaw
Ian Q. Whishaw University of Lethbridge
Igor Kovalchuk
Igor Kovalchuk University of Lethbridge
Martin E. Schwab
Martin E. Schwab University of Zurich
Karim Fouad
Karim Fouad University of Alberta
Robert J. Sutherland
Robert J. Sutherland University of Lethbridge
Bryan Kolb
Bryan Kolb University of Lethbridge
Nardhy Gomez-Lopez
Nardhy Gomez-Lopez Wayne State University
Olga Kovalchuk
Olga Kovalchuk University of Lethbridge
Suzanne King
Suzanne King McGill University
Volker Dietz
Volker Dietz University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in Neuroscience opens the door to a wide variety of related fields, each offering unique online education options. Many students consider programs such as 1 year msw programs to fast-track their qualifications in social work. These accelerated degrees can help you quickly enter dynamic human services roles that overlap with neuroscientific principles.

For those interested in understanding human behavior, a fast track psychology degree online lets you study the mind’s processes in a flexible, convenient format. Counseling is another popular pathway, and it’s essential to look for cacrep accredited programs online—these ensure your degree meets industry standards for professional practice.

Finally, affordability plays a key role in choosing your path. Prospective counselors can benefit from considering the masters in counseling online cost before enrolling. Carefully comparing options helps align your academic choices with your career ambitions in neuroscience and its related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Gerlinde A. S. Metz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles