World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
31
Citations
5660
World Ranking
3263
National Ranking
1102

Dominik Schillinger publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Schillinger sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 111 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Dominik Schillinger D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Schillinger sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dominik Schillinger is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and specializes in engineering with a focus on computational mechanics. Their research contributions cover a wide range of topics within this field, reflecting involvement in advanced numerical methods, material mechanics, and mathematical modeling.

The main fields of study for Schillinger include:

  • Engineering

Within engineering, Schillinger has contributed extensively to several subfields:

  • Computational Mechanics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Their research topics are representative of advanced computational and mathematical techniques applied in engineering contexts:

  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Composite Material Mechanics
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks

Schillinger's publication record includes contributions to several recognized venues, most notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Computational Mechanics
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
  • Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Schillinger include:

  • "Removal of spurious outlier frequencies and modes from isogeometric discretizations of second- and fourth-order problems in one, two, and three dimensions" (2021, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering)
  • "Mixed isogeometric collocation for geometrically exact 3D beams with elasto-visco-plastic material behavior and softening effects" (2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering)
  • "Experimental and numerical investigations of microwave-induced damage and fracture formation in rock" (2021, Journal of Thermal Stresses)
  • "Higher-order imperfect interface modeling via complex variables based asymptotic analysis" (2020, International Journal of Engineering Science)
  • "A unified framework for Navier-Stokes Cahn-Hilliard models with non-matching densities" (2023, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Schillinger include:

  • René R. Hiemstra
  • Thi-Hoa Nguyen
  • Stein K.F. Stoter
  • Etienne Jessen
  • M.F.P. ten Eikelder

Best Publications

  • An Isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS, immersed boundary methods, and T-spline CAD surfaces

    Dominik Schillinger;Dominik Schillinger;Luca Dedè;Michael A. Scott;John A. Evans

  • An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves

    David Kamensky;Ming Chen Hsu;Dominik Schillinger;John A. Evans

  • The Finite Cell Method: A Review in the Context of Higher-Order Structural Analysis of CAD and Image-Based Geometric Models

    Dominik Schillinger;Martin Ruess

  • Isogeometric Collocation: Cost Comparison with Galerkin Methods and Extension to Adaptive Hierarchical NURBS Discretizations

    Dominik Schillinger;John A. Evans;Alessandro Reali;Michael A. Scott

  • Weak coupling for isogeometric analysis of non-matching and trimmed multi-patch geometries

    Martin Ruess;Dominik Schillinger;Ali I. Özcan;Ernst Rank

  • Geometric modeling, isogeometric analysis and the finite cell method

    E. Rank;M. Ruess;S. Kollmannsberger;D. Schillinger

  • Small and large deformation analysis with the p- and B-spline versions of the Finite Cell Method

    Dominik Schillinger;Martin Ruess;Nils Zander;Yuri Bazilevs

  • Weakly enforced essential boundary conditions for NURBS-embedded and trimmed NURBS geometries on the basis of the finite cell method

    Martin Ruess;D. Schillinger;Y. Bazilevs;V. Varduhn

  • An unfitted hp-adaptive finite element method based on hierarchical B-splines for interface problems of complex geometry

    Dominik Schillinger;Ernst Rank

  • Reduced Bézier element quadrature rules for quadratic and cubic splines in isogeometric analysis

    Dominik Schillinger;Dominik Schillinger;Shaikh J. Hossain;Thomas J.R. Hughes

  • The tetrahedral finite cell method for fluids: Immersogeometric analysis of turbulent flow around complex geometries

    Fei Xu;Dominik Schillinger;David Kamensky;Vasco Varduhn

  • The hp‐d‐adaptive finite cell method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics

    D. Schillinger;A. Düster;E. Rank

  • An interactive geometry modeling and parametric design platform for isogeometric analysis

    Ming-Chen Hsu;Chenglong Wang;Austin J. Herrema;Dominik Schillinger

  • Multi-level hp-adaptivity: high-order mesh adaptivity without the difficulties of constraining hanging nodes

    Nils Zander;Tino Bog;Stefan Kollmannsberger;Dominik Schillinger

  • Optimal and reduced quadrature rules for tensor product and hierarchically refined splines in isogeometric analysis

    René R. Hiemstra;Francesco Calabrò;Dominik Schillinger;Thomas J.R. Hughes

  • The non-symmetric Nitsche method for the parameter-free imposition of weak boundary and coupling conditions in immersed finite elements

    Dominik Schillinger;Isaac Harari;Ming Chen Hsu;David Kamensky

  • Variationally consistent isogeometric analysis of trimmed thin shells at finite deformations, based on the STEP exchange format

    Yujie Guo;Jason Heller;Thomas J.R. Hughes;Martin Ruess

  • Isogeometric collocation for phase-field fracture models

    Dominik Schillinger;Michael J. Borden;Michael J. Borden;Henryk K. Stolarski

  • A parameter-free variational coupling approach for trimmed isogeometric thin shells

    Yujie Guo;Martin Ruess;Dominik Schillinger

  • The tetrahedral finite cell method: Higher‐order immersogeometric analysis on adaptive non‐boundary‐fitted meshes

    Vasco Varduhn;Ming Chen Hsu;Martin Ruess;Dominik Schillinger

  • Local fields and overall transverse properties of unidirectional composite materials with multiple nanofibers and Steigmann–Ogden interfaces

    Zhilin Han;Zhilin Han;Sofia G. Mogilevskaya;Dominik Schillinger

  • FCMLab: A finite cell research toolbox for MATLAB

    Nils Zander;Tino Bog;Mohamed Elhaddad;R. Espinoza

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst Rank
Ernst Rank Technical University of Munich
Thomas J. R. Hughes
Thomas J. R. Hughes The University of Texas at Austin
Alexander Düster
Alexander Düster Hamburg University of Technology
Ming-Chen Hsu
Ming-Chen Hsu Iowa State University
Yuri Bazilevs
Yuri Bazilevs Brown University
Alessandro Reali
Alessandro Reali University of Pavia
Ying Zhao
Ying Zhao Nankai University
Michele Guala
Michele Guala University of Minnesota
Raimund Rolfes
Raimund Rolfes University of Hannover
Günther Meschke
Günther Meschke Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career pathways. For those interested in behavioral sciences, pursuing the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis offers a valuable route into understanding human and organizational behavior.

Additionally, individuals looking for careers in counseling might consider various options. The article on different types of counseling degrees provides a clear overview to help decide the right specialization. For those seeking a quicker route into the field, the easiest counseling degree programs can be a strategic choice to fast-track entry into counseling careers.

Moreover, understanding career outcomes, such as the fbi profiler salary, highlights the importance of integrating technical expertise with behavioral insights. This combined knowledge can enhance opportunities in security, engineering psychology, and related fields.

Overall, considering related online degrees enriches the skill set of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering students, making them versatile professionals ready for tomorrow’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Dominik Schillinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles