World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 31 3263 3066 1102 979 111 5660

Dominik Schillinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dominik Schillinger between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dominik Schillinger published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2023. 13 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2023. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
2007 2026

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dominik Schillinger: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 6
2014 5
2015 7
2016 9
2017 7
2018 10
2019 6
2020 13
2021 15
2022 11
2023 20
2024 14
2025 11
2026 2
Total 158
Download as CSV

Dominik Schillinger publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Schillinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 107–116 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 111 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113 111
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Dominik Schillinger D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Schillinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113 31
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Dominik Schillinger is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and specializes in engineering with a focus on computational mechanics. Their research contributions cover a wide range of topics within this field, reflecting involvement in advanced numerical methods, material mechanics, and mathematical modeling.

The main fields of study for Schillinger include:

  • Engineering

Within engineering, Schillinger has contributed extensively to several subfields:

  • Computational Mechanics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Their research topics are representative of advanced computational and mathematical techniques applied in engineering contexts:

  • Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Composite Material Mechanics
  • Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
  • Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Model Reduction and Neural Networks

Schillinger's publication record includes contributions to several recognized venues, most notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Computational Mechanics
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
  • Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Schillinger include:

  • "Removal of spurious outlier frequencies and modes from isogeometric discretizations of second- and fourth-order problems in one, two, and three dimensions" (2021, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering)
  • "Mixed isogeometric collocation for geometrically exact 3D beams with elasto-visco-plastic material behavior and softening effects" (2022, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering)
  • "Experimental and numerical investigations of microwave-induced damage and fracture formation in rock" (2021, Journal of Thermal Stresses)
  • "Higher-order imperfect interface modeling via complex variables based asymptotic analysis" (2020, International Journal of Engineering Science)
  • "A unified framework for Navier-Stokes Cahn-Hilliard models with non-matching densities" (2023, Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Schillinger include:

  • René R. Hiemstra
  • Thi-Hoa Nguyen
  • Stein K.F. Stoter
  • Etienne Jessen
  • M.F.P. ten Eikelder

Best Publications

  • An Isogeometric design-through-analysis methodology based on adaptive hierarchical refinement of NURBS, immersed boundary methods, and T-spline CAD surfaces

    Dominik Schillinger;Dominik Schillinger;Luca Dedè;Michael A. Scott;John A. Evans

  • An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves

    David Kamensky;Ming Chen Hsu;Dominik Schillinger;John A. Evans

  • The Finite Cell Method: A Review in the Context of Higher-Order Structural Analysis of CAD and Image-Based Geometric Models

    Dominik Schillinger;Martin Ruess

  • Isogeometric Collocation: Cost Comparison with Galerkin Methods and Extension to Adaptive Hierarchical NURBS Discretizations

    Dominik Schillinger;John A. Evans;Alessandro Reali;Michael A. Scott

  • Weak coupling for isogeometric analysis of non-matching and trimmed multi-patch geometries

    Martin Ruess;Dominik Schillinger;Ali I. Özcan;Ernst Rank

  • Geometric modeling, isogeometric analysis and the finite cell method

    E. Rank;M. Ruess;S. Kollmannsberger;D. Schillinger

  • Small and large deformation analysis with the p- and B-spline versions of the Finite Cell Method

    Dominik Schillinger;Martin Ruess;Nils Zander;Yuri Bazilevs

  • Weakly enforced essential boundary conditions for NURBS-embedded and trimmed NURBS geometries on the basis of the finite cell method

    Martin Ruess;D. Schillinger;Y. Bazilevs;V. Varduhn

  • An unfitted hp-adaptive finite element method based on hierarchical B-splines for interface problems of complex geometry

    Dominik Schillinger;Ernst Rank

  • Reduced Bézier element quadrature rules for quadratic and cubic splines in isogeometric analysis

    Dominik Schillinger;Dominik Schillinger;Shaikh J. Hossain;Thomas J.R. Hughes

  • The tetrahedral finite cell method for fluids: Immersogeometric analysis of turbulent flow around complex geometries

    Fei Xu;Dominik Schillinger;David Kamensky;Vasco Varduhn

  • The hp‐d‐adaptive finite cell method for geometrically nonlinear problems of solid mechanics

    D. Schillinger;A. Düster;E. Rank

  • An interactive geometry modeling and parametric design platform for isogeometric analysis

    Ming-Chen Hsu;Chenglong Wang;Austin J. Herrema;Dominik Schillinger

  • Multi-level hp-adaptivity: high-order mesh adaptivity without the difficulties of constraining hanging nodes

    Nils Zander;Tino Bog;Stefan Kollmannsberger;Dominik Schillinger

  • Optimal and reduced quadrature rules for tensor product and hierarchically refined splines in isogeometric analysis

    René R. Hiemstra;Francesco Calabrò;Dominik Schillinger;Thomas J.R. Hughes

  • The non-symmetric Nitsche method for the parameter-free imposition of weak boundary and coupling conditions in immersed finite elements

    Dominik Schillinger;Isaac Harari;Ming Chen Hsu;David Kamensky

  • Variationally consistent isogeometric analysis of trimmed thin shells at finite deformations, based on the STEP exchange format

    Yujie Guo;Jason Heller;Thomas J.R. Hughes;Martin Ruess

  • Isogeometric collocation for phase-field fracture models

    Dominik Schillinger;Michael J. Borden;Michael J. Borden;Henryk K. Stolarski

  • A parameter-free variational coupling approach for trimmed isogeometric thin shells

    Yujie Guo;Martin Ruess;Dominik Schillinger

  • The tetrahedral finite cell method: Higher‐order immersogeometric analysis on adaptive non‐boundary‐fitted meshes

    Vasco Varduhn;Ming Chen Hsu;Martin Ruess;Dominik Schillinger

  • Local fields and overall transverse properties of unidirectional composite materials with multiple nanofibers and Steigmann–Ogden interfaces

    Zhilin Han;Zhilin Han;Sofia G. Mogilevskaya;Dominik Schillinger

  • FCMLab: A finite cell research toolbox for MATLAB

    Nils Zander;Tino Bog;Mohamed Elhaddad;R. Espinoza

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst Rank
Ernst Rank Technical University of Munich
Thomas J. R. Hughes
Thomas J. R. Hughes The University of Texas at Austin
Alexander Düster
Alexander Düster Hamburg University of Technology
Ming-Chen Hsu
Ming-Chen Hsu Iowa State University
Yuri Bazilevs
Yuri Bazilevs Brown University
Alessandro Reali
Alessandro Reali University of Pavia
Ying Zhao
Ying Zhao Nankai University
Michele Guala
Michele Guala University of Minnesota
Raimund Rolfes
Raimund Rolfes University of Hannover
Günther Meschke
Günther Meschke Ruhr University Bochum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering can open doors to diverse career pathways. For those interested in behavioral sciences, pursuing the fastest online masters in applied behavior analysis offers a valuable route into understanding human and organizational behavior.

Additionally, individuals looking for careers in counseling might consider various options. The article on different types of counseling degrees provides a clear overview to help decide the right specialization. For those seeking a quicker route into the field, the easiest counseling degree programs can be a strategic choice to fast-track entry into counseling careers.

Moreover, understanding career outcomes, such as the fbi profiler salary, highlights the importance of integrating technical expertise with behavioral insights. This combined knowledge can enhance opportunities in security, engineering psychology, and related fields.

Overall, considering related online degrees enriches the skill set of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering students, making them versatile professionals ready for tomorrow’s evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Dominik Schillinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles