World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6390 5938 3077 2808 93 8263

Cornelia Pechmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cornelia Pechmann between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cornelia Pechmann published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2012. 5 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2012. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1989 2026

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cornelia Pechmann: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 3
1991 2
1992 2
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 3
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 4
2014 2
2015 6
2016 4
2017 3
2018 4
2019 6
2020 7
2021 4
2022 2
2023 3
2024 6
2025 4
2026 1
Total 107
Download as CSV

Cornelia Pechmann publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia Pechmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 93 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 93
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Cornelia Pechmann D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia Pechmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Cornelia Pechmann is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research focuses on social sciences, with significant contributions in subfields including sociology and political science, marketing, communication, general health professions, and physiology. The work spans a variety of topics related to social media, health behaviors, and consumer dynamics.

The scientist's recent publications cover diverse themes such as health research recruitment, online support groups, and consumer psychology. Key papers include:

  • Facebook Recruitment Using Zip Codes to Improve Diversity in Health Research: Longitudinal Observational Study, 2020, published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Perceived Costs versus Actual Benefits of Demographic Self-Disclosure in Online Support Groups, 2020, published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology
  • Undergraduate Support for University Smoke-Free and Vape-Free Campus Policies and Student Engagement: A Quasi-Experimental Intervention, 2020, published in the Journal of American College Health
  • Responsible Research in Business and Management (RRBM) and the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing: Connected Through Impact, 2021, published in the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
  • Buddies as In-Group Influencers in Online Support Groups: A Social Network Analysis of Processes and Outcomes, 2022, published in the Journal of Interactive Marketing

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Cornelia Pechmann include Judith J. Prochaska, David S. Timberlake, Douglas Calder, Joshua Rhee, and Alisa A. Padon.

Publications by Pechmann have appeared predominantly in venues such as the SSRN Electronic Journal, the Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, the Journal of Medical Internet Research, the Journal of Consumer Psychology, and the Journal of American College Health.

Main fields of study pursued by this researcher center on social sciences, featuring work that crosses into marketing and communication, as well as health-related professions and physiology.

Research topics addressed comprise:

  • Social Media and Politics
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Best Publications

  • What to Convey in Antismoking Advertisements for Adolescents: The Use of Protection Motivation Theory to Identify Effective Message Themes

    Cornelia Pechmann;Guangzhi Zhao;Marvin E. Goldberg;Ellen Thomas Reibling

  • Advertising Repetition: A Critical Review of Wearin and Wearout

    Cornelia Pechmann;David W. Stewart

  • The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Adolescents' Response to Antismoking Advertising Campaigns

    Guangzhi Zhao;Cornelia Pechmann

  • Transformative Consumer Research: For Personal and Collective Well-Being

    David Glen Mick;Simone Pettigrew;Cornelia (Connie) Pechmann;Cornelia (Connie) Pechmann;Julie L. Ozanne

  • Impulsive and Self-Conscious: Adolescents' Vulnerability to Advertising and Promotion

    Cornelia Pechmann;Linda Levine;Sandra Loughlin;Frances Leslie

  • The Effects of Comparative Advertising on Attention, Memory, and Purchase Intentions

    Cornelia Pechmann;David W. Stewart

  • Smoking Scenes in Movies and Antismoking Advertisements Before Movies: Effects on Youth

    Cornelia Pechmann;Chuan-Fong Shih

  • The Use of Comparative Advertising for Brand Positioning: Association versus Differentiation

    Cornelia Pechmann;S. Ratneshwar

  • Goal-Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across-Category Consideration

    S. Ratneshwar;Cornelia Pechmann;Allan D. Shocker

  • An Experimental Investigation of the Joint Effects of Advertising and Peers on Adolescents' Beliefs and Intentions about Cigarette Consumption

    Cornelia Pechmann;Susan J. Knight

  • Goal-Derived Categories: The Role of Personal and Situational Goals in Category Representations

    S. Ratneshwar;Lawrence W. Barsalou;Cornelia Pechmann;Melissa Moore

  • Predicting when Two-Sided Ads will be More Effective than One-Sided Ads: The Role of Correlational and Correspondent Inferences:

    Cornelia Pechmann

  • The Effects of Antismoking and Cigarette Advertising on Young Adolescents' Perceptions of Peers Who Smoke

    Cornelia Pechmann;S. Ratneshwar

  • Antismoking Advertisements for Youths: An Independent Evaluation of Health, Counter-Industry, and Industry Approaches

    Cornelia Pechmann;Ellen T. Reibling

  • Consumer Covariation Judgments: Theory or Data Driven?

    Cornelia Pechmann;S. Ratneshwar

  • Twitter=quitter? An analysis of Twitter quit smoking social networks

    Judith J Prochaska;Cornelia Pechmann;Romina Kim;James M Leonhardt

  • Origins, Qualities, and Envisionments of Transformative Consumer Research

    David Glen Mick;Simone Pettigrew;Cornelia Pechmann;Julie L. Ozanne

  • A Comparison of Health Communication Models: Risk Learning Versus Stereotype Priming

    Cornelia Pechmann

  • Creating Boundary-Breaking, Marketing-Relevant Consumer Research:

    Deborah J. MacInnis;Vicki G. Morwitz;Simona Botti;Donna L. Hoffman

  • Anti-smoking advertising campaigns targeting youth: case studies from USA and Canada

    Cornelia Pechmann;Ellen Thomas Reibling

  • Avoiding the risk of responsibility by seeking uncertainty: Responsibility aversion and preference for indirect agency when choosing for others

    James M. Leonhardt;L. Robin Keller;Cornelia Pechmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith J. Prochaska
Judith J. Prochaska Stanford University
Julie L. Ozanne
Julie L. Ozanne University of Melbourne
S. Ratneshwar
S. Ratneshwar University of Missouri
Simone Pettigrew
Simone Pettigrew George Institute for Global Health
David Glen Mick
David Glen Mick University of Virginia
David W. Stewart
David W. Stewart Loyola Marymount University
Kevin L. Delucchi
Kevin L. Delucchi University of California, San Francisco
Robert V. Kozinets
Robert V. Kozinets University of Southern California
J. Craig Andrews
J. Craig Andrews Marquette University
Christopher S. Carpenter
Christopher S. Carpenter Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the social sciences and humanities opens up multiple career possibilities, including counseling, social work, and psychology. One key consideration for students is affordability. If budget is a concern, some of the cheapest online psychology degree programs can make advanced education more accessible without compromising quality.

For those interested in helping individuals, families, and communities, online msw programs (Master of Social Work) may be ideal. Many programs now offer flexible admission standards and formats designed for working professionals.

Students aiming for clinical or counseling practice at the doctoral level can consider the online psyd program options available. These programs blend theoretical learning with practical experience and may better suit those looking for hands-on clinical training.

For a faster route to becoming a marriage and family therapist, accelerated mft programs online allow students to earn a degree in less time and begin their practice sooner.

Whether seeking affordability, flexibility, or acceleration, a range of online degrees supports your path into meaningful and impactful social science and humanities careers.

Best Scientists Citing Cornelia Pechmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles