World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
6631
World Ranking
9414
National Ranking
3978

Sandra E. Loughlin publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra E. Loughlin sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 52 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sandra E. Loughlin D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra E. Loughlin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra E. Loughlin is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Neuroscience. The work encompasses detailed studies within the subfields of Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their publications concentrate on main topics that include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study, Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling, and the influence of Neurotransmitter Receptor on Behavior. These thematic areas highlight a focus on understanding receptor function at molecular and cellular levels and their behavioral implications.

The following is a list of recent papers published by Sandra E. Loughlin:

  • Chronic exposure to cigarette smoke extract upregulates nicotinic receptor binding in adult and adolescent rats, 2020, Neuropharmacology

The researcher frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Michelle Cano
  • Daisy D. Reynaga
  • James D. Belluzzi
  • Frances M. Leslie

Publication venues for Sandra E. Loughlin's work are primarily concentrated in:

  • Neuropharmacology

Best Publications

  • In vivo induction of massive proliferation, directed migration, and differentiation of neural cells in the adult mammalian brain.

    James Fallon;Steve Reid;Richard Kinyamu;Isaac Opole

  • Nicotine and the adolescent brain

    Menglu Yuan;Sarah J. Cross;Sandra E. Loughlin;Frances M. Leslie

  • Efferent projections of nucleus locus coeruleus: topographic organization of cells of origin demonstrated by three-dimensional reconstruction.

    S.E. Loughlin;S.L. Foote;F.E. Bloom

  • Impulsive and Self-Conscious: Adolescents' Vulnerability to Advertising and Promotion

    Cornelia Pechmann;Linda Levine;Sandra Loughlin;Frances Leslie

  • Efferent projections of nucleus locus coeruleus: Morphologic subpopulations have different efferent targets

    S.E. Loughlin;S.L. Foote;R. Grzanna

  • Epidermal growth factor immunoreactive material in the central nervous system: location and development

    James H. Fallon;Kim B. Seroogy;Sandra E. Loughlin;Richard S. Morrison

  • Locus coeruleus projections to cortex: topography, morphology and collateralization.

    Sandra E. Loughlin;Sandra E. Loughlin;Stephen L. Foote;Stephen L. Foote;James H. Fallon;James H. Fallon

  • Anatomical evidence for alpha-2 adrenoceptor heterogeneity: differential autoradiographic distributions of [3H]rauwolscine and [3H]idazoxan in rat brain

    C L Boyajian;S E Loughlin;F M Leslie

  • Monoamine innervation of the forebrain: Collateralization

    James H. Fallon;Sandra E. Loughlin

  • Monoamine Innervation of Cerebral Cortex and a Theory of the Role of Monoamines in Cerebral Cortex and Basal Ganglia

    James H. Fallon;Sandra E. Loughlin

  • The islands of Calleja complex of rat basal forebrain. III. Histochemical evidence for a striatopallidal system.

    James H. Fallon;Sandra E. Loughlin;Charles E. Ribak

  • Substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area projections to cortex: topography and collateralization

    S.E. Loughlin;J.H. Fallon

  • Smoking to self-medicate attentional and emotional dysfunctions.

    Jean-G Gehricke;Sandra E Loughlin;Carol K Whalen;Steven G Potkin

  • The origin of cholecystokinin terminals in the basal forebrain of the rat: Evidence from immunofluorencence and retrograde tracing

    James H. Fallon;Robb Hicks;Sandra E. Loughlin

  • Noradrenergic changes and memory loss in aged mice.

    Frances M. Leslie;Sandra E. Loughlin;Debra B. Sternberg;James L. McGaugh

  • Effects of morphine on DNA synthesis in neonatal rat brain.

    Harley I. Kornblum;Sandra E. Loughlin;Frances M. Leslie

  • Dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic projections to amygdala from substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area.

    Sandra E. Loughlin;James H. Fallon

  • Adolescent Development of Forebrain Stimulant Responsiveness: Insights from Animal Studies

    Frances M. Leslie;Sandra E. Loughlin;Ruihua Wang;Lilyanna Perez

  • Nicotine Alters Limbic Function in Adolescent Rat by a 5-HT1A Receptor Mechanism

    Jasmin M Dao;Susan C McQuown;Sandra E Loughlin;James D Belluzzi

  • Mesostriatal projections from ventral tegmentum and dorsal raphe: Cells project ipsilaterally or contralaterally but not bilaterally

    Sandra E. Loughlin;James H. Fallon

Frequent Co-Authors

Frances M. Leslie
Frances M. Leslie University of California, Irvine
James H. Fallon
James H. Fallon University of California, Irvine
Kim B. Seroogy
Kim B. Seroogy University of Cincinnati
Ellis R. Levin
Ellis R. Levin University of California, Irvine
Carol K. Whalen
Carol K. Whalen University of California, Irvine
Larry D. Jamner
Larry D. Jamner University of California, Irvine
Ralph A. Bradshaw
Ralph A. Bradshaw University of California, Irvine
Steven G. Potkin
Steven G. Potkin University of California, Irvine
Jennifer B. Unger
Jennifer B. Unger University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to several related fields where you can advance your education online. Many students consider psychology degrees online for a flexible, affordable route toward understanding the human mind, while building a strong foundation for future specialization.

For those interested in social services, the easiest msw programs to get into offer accessible entry points to a career in social work, blending neuroscience insights with real-world community impact. Those seeking licensed clinical roles might pursue an online psy d program to prepare for clinical psychology practice in a flexible, remote format.

Family therapy is also an appealing path. The mft programs online can help you become a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist by studying neuroscience, relationships, and therapy strategies in a condensed timeframe.

No matter your career ambitions, online degrees related to neuroscience offer diverse and accessible options that cater to different interests and work-life needs.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra E. Loughlin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles