World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 40 7477 7216 2035 1889 160 4535

Haim Waisman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Haim Waisman between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Haim Waisman published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2013. 14 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2013. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 3 publications
2002 2026

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Haim Waisman: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 0
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 0
2008 4
2009 1
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 16
2014 9
2015 10
2016 13
2017 10
2018 5
2019 8
2020 9
2021 15
2022 6
2023 7
2024 10
2025 11
2026 3
Total 165
Download as CSV

Haim Waisman publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haim Waisman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 160 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415 160
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Haim Waisman D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Haim Waisman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348 40
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Haim Waisman is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has concentrated research efforts primarily in the field of Engineering, with a significant focus on Mechanics of Materials and Civil and Structural Engineering. Their work integrates aspects of Computational Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, extending also into Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's research explores a range of specialized topics, including

  • Numerical methods in engineering
  • Rock Mechanics and Modeling
  • Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
  • Topology Optimization in Engineering
  • Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
  • High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
  • Composite Material Mechanics

Haim Waisman has contributed publications in several reputable journals. Most frequently published venues include

  • Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Journal of Engineering Mechanics
  • Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
  • Engineering Fracture Mechanics

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Waisman are:

  • Thermal-conductivity degradation across cracks in coupled thermo-mechanical systems modeled by the phase-field fracture method, 2020, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
  • A consistent phase field model for hydraulic fracture propagation in poroelastic media, 2020, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
  • Rupture of 3D-printed hyperelastic composites: Experiments and phase field fracture modeling, 2020, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
  • Brittle-ductile failure transition in geomaterials modeled by a modified phase-field method with a varying damage-driving energy coefficient, 2020, International Journal of Plasticity
  • Adaptive phase field method using novel physics based refinement criteria, 2021, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Waisman include

  • Mostafa E. Mobasher
  • Ameer Marzok
  • Jonathan B. Russ
  • Yijun Chen
  • João Paulo Pascon

Best Publications

  • From diffuse damage to sharp cohesive cracks: A coupled XFEM framework for failure analysis of quasi-brittle materials

    Yongxiang Wang;Haim Waisman

  • Fracture of viscoelastic solids modeled with a modified phase field method

    Rilin Shen;Rilin Shen;Haim Waisman;Licheng Guo

  • Experimental application and enhancement of the XFEM-GA algorithm for the detection of flaws in structures

    Eleni N. Chatzi;Badri Hiriyur;Haim Waisman;Andrew W. Smyth

  • Detection and quantification of flaws in structures by the extended finite element method and genetic algorithms

    Haim Waisman;Eleni Chatzi;Andrew W. Smyth

  • Uncertainty quantification in homogenization of heterogeneous microstructures modeled by XFEM

    Badri Hiriyur;Haim Waisman;George Deodatis

  • A unified model for metal failure capturing shear banding and fracture

    Colin McAuliffe;Haim Waisman

  • Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing

    Richard L. Li;Jonathan Russ;Costas Paschalides;Giovanni Ferrari

  • Progressive delamination analysis of composite materials using XFEM and a discrete damage zone model

    Yongxiang Wang;Haim Waisman

  • A temperature dependent creep damage model for polycrystalline ice

    Ravindra Duddu;Haim Waisman

  • A nonlocal continuum damage mechanics approach to simulation of creep fracture in ice sheets

    Ravindra Duddu;Haim Waisman

  • Nondestructive identification of multiple flaws using XFEM and a topologically adapting artificial bee colony algorithm

    Hao Sun;Haim Waisman;Raimondo Betti

  • Thermal-conductivity degradation across cracks in coupled thermo-mechanical systems modeled by the phase-field fracture method

    Lampros Svolos;Curt A. Bronkhorst;Haim Waisman

  • Topology optimization of viscoelastic structures using a time-dependent adjoint method

    Kai A. James;Haim Waisman

  • A multiscale flaw detection algorithm based on XFEM

    Hao Sun;Haim Waisman;Raimondo Betti

  • A coupled phase field shear band model for ductile–brittle transition in notched plate impacts

    Colin McAuliffe;Haim Waisman

  • Failure Mitigation in Optimal Topology Design Using a Coupled Nonlinear Continuum Damage Model

    Kai A. James;Haim Waisman

  • Rupture of 3D-printed hyperelastic composites: Experiments and phase field fracture modeling

    Jonathan Russ;Viacheslav Slesarenko;Stephan Rudykh;Haim Waisman

  • A consistent phase field model for hydraulic fracture propagation in poroelastic media

    Liang-Ping Yi;Haim Waisman;Zhao-Zhong Yang;Xiao-Gang Li

  • Brittle-ductile failure transition in geomaterials modeled by a modified phase-field method with a varying damage-driving energy coefficient

    Tao You;Haim Waisman;Qi-Zhi Zhu

  • Adaptive phase field method using novel physics based refinement criteria

    H. Hirshikesh;A.L.N. Pramod;Haim Waisman;S. Natarajan

  • Parametric enrichment adaptivity by the extended finite element method

    Haim Waisman;Ted Belytschko

  • Stochastic analysis of polymer composites rupture at large deformations modeled by a phase field method

    Jie Wu;Jie Wu;Colin McAuliffe;Haim Waisman;George Deodatis

  • Combined stability analysis of phase-field dynamic fracture and shear band localization

    Miguel Arriaga;Haim Waisman

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond S. Tuminaro
Raymond S. Tuminaro Sandia National Laboratories
Raimondo Betti
Raimondo Betti Columbia University
Jacob Fish
Jacob Fish Columbia University
David E. Keyes
David E. Keyes King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Isaac Harari
Isaac Harari Tel Aviv University
Jeffrey W. Kysar
Jeffrey W. Kysar Columbia University
Haim Abramovich
Haim Abramovich Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
George Deodatis
George Deodatis Columbia University
John N. Shadid
John N. Shadid Sandia National Laboratories
Eleni Chatzi
Eleni Chatzi ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to various online degrees that can complement this field. For those interested in leadership roles, the best online mba under 30k offers an affordable way to build business and management skills. If you want to specialize in business education, look for programs with internationally recognized credibility, such as the aacsb accredited online mba.

Technology is quickly changing industries. As digital platforms drive modern marketing, a social media marketing degree can help professionals bridge the gap between technical innovation and audience engagement. For those aiming to combine management skills with customer-focused sectors, consider hospitality management courses online to quickly advance in fields like tourism, event management, and hotel operations.

Each pathway offers flexibility, practical skills, and potential for career growth—making them ideal complements for those passionate about Engineering and Technology careers in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Haim Waisman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles