World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
9583
World Ranking
2685
National Ranking
102

David Phillips publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Phillips sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 319 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

David Phillips D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Phillips sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Phillips is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research spans a range of subfields including Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence applications in geosciences, Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, and Geology.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics primarily focused on Geological and Geochemical Analysis, earthquake and tectonic studies, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, High-pressure geophysics and materials, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Archaeology and ancient environmental studies, and Geological and Geophysical Studies.

Phillips has authored numerous publications, contributing to key journals and conferences. Frequent venues where their work appears include Lithos, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America, Chemical Geology, Journal of Petrology, and Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta.

Several recent papers authored or coauthored by Phillips highlight their active research areas and collaborative nature. Notable recent publications include:

  • Interpreting and reporting 40Ar/39Ar geochronologic data, 2020, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • Mesozoic Orogenic Gold Mineralization in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China: A Focused Event at 120 ± 2 Ma During Cooling of Pregold Granite Intrusions, 2020, Economic Geology
  • Kimberlite genesis from a common carbonate-rich primary melt modified by lithospheric mantle assimilation, 2020, Science Advances
  • Kimberlite Metasomatism of the Lithosphere and the Evolution of Olivine in Carbonate-rich Melts - Evidence from the Kimberley Kimberlites (South Africa), 2020, Journal of Petrology
  • Geochronology of Diamonds, 2022, Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry

Phillips maintains ongoing collaborations with several frequent coauthors including Hayden Dalton, Andrea Giuliani, Erin Matchan, Janet Hergt, and D. Graham Pearson. The intensity of cooperation is reflected in multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • 160 h of chemical-looping combustion in a 10 kW reactor system with a NiO-based oxygen carrier

    Unknown

  • High abundances of noble gas and chlorine delivered to the mantle by serpentinite subduction

    Mark A. Kendrick;Marco Scambelluri;Masahiko Honda;David Phillips

  • Interpreting and reporting 40Ar/39Ar geochronologic data

    Allen J. Schaen;Brian R. Jicha;Kip V. Hodges;Pieter Vermeesch

  • The Fish Canyon Tuff: A new look at an old low-temperature thermochronology standard

    Andrew Gleadow;Mark Harrison;Barry Kohn;Rául Lugo-Zazueta

  • Manual de calidad y gesti�n de la Red Espa�ola de Aerobiolog�a

    Unknown

  • Structural, metamorphic, and geochronological constraints on alternating compression and extension in the Early Paleozoic Gondwanan Pacific margin, northeastern Australia

    Christopher Lloyd Fergusson;Robert Henderson;I W Withnall;Christopher Fanning

  • Subduction-related diamonds? — The evidence for a mantle-derived origin from coupled δ13C–δ15N determinations

    Pierre Cartigny;Jeff W Harris;David Phillips;Michel Girard

  • Ultra-high precision 40Ar/39Ar ages for Fish Canyon Tuff and Alder Creek Rhyolite sanidine: New dating standards required?

    D. Phillips;E.L. Matchan

  • Mesozoic Orogenic Gold Mineralization in the Jiaodong Peninsula, China: A Focused Event at 120 ± 2 Ma during Cooling of Pregold Granite Intrusions

    Liang Zhang;Liang Zhang;Roberto F. Weinberg;Li Qiang Yang;David I. Groves;David I. Groves

  • Constraints on kimberlite ascent mechanisms revealed by phlogopite compositions in kimberlites and mantle xenoliths

    Andrea Giuliani;Andrea Giuliani;David Phillips;Vadim S. Kamenetsky;Karsten Goemann

  • The Kalkarindji continental flood basalt province: A new Cambrian large igneous province in Australia with possible links to faunal extinctions

    Linda M Glass;David Phillips

  • Argon isotopic zoning in mantle phlogopite

    D. Phillips;Tullis C. Onstott

  • Subduction zone fluxes of halogens and noble gases in seafloor and forearc serpentinites

    Mark A. Kendrick;Masahiko Honda;Thomas Pettke;Marco Scambelluri

  • Provenance ages of the Neoproterozoic Katanga Supergroup (Central African Copperbelt), with implications for basin evolution

    S Master;C. Rainaud;Richard Armstrong;David Phillips

  • Data reporting norms for 40Ar/39Ar geochronology

    Paul R. Renne;Paul R. Renne;Alan L. Deino;Willis E. Hames;Matthew T. Heizler

  • Evolution of a reworked orogenic zone: The boundary between the delamerian and lachlan fold belts, southeastern Australia *

    John Miller;D. Phillips;C.J.L. Wilson;L.J. Dugdale

  • The final stages of kimberlite petrogenesis: petrography, mineral chemistry, melt inclusions and Sr-CO isotope geochemistry of the Bultfontein kimberlite (Kimberley, South Africa)

    Unknown

  • Kimberlite genesis from a common carbonate-rich primary melt modified by lithospheric mantle assimilation.

    Andrea Giuliani;Andrea Giuliani;Andrea Giuliani;D. Graham Pearson;Ashton Soltys;Hayden Dalton

  • Did diamond-bearing orangeites originate from MARID-veined peridotites in the lithospheric mantle?

    Andrea Giuliani;David Phillips;Jon D. Woodhead;Vadim S. Kamenetsky

  • Nature of alkali-carbonate fluids in the sub-continental lithospheric mantle

    Andrea Giuliani;Vadim S Kamenetsky;David Phillips;Mark Kendrick

  • Structural aspects of ship collisions

    Unknown

  • Stable isotope (C, O, S) compositions of volatile-rich minerals in kimberlites: A review

    Andrea Giuliani;David Phillips;Vadim S. Kamenetsky;Marco L. Fiorentini

  • Monazite U–Pb dating and 40Ar–39Ar thermochronology of metamorphic events in the Central African Copperbelt during the Pan-African Lufilian Orogeny

    Unknown

  • A quartz sealed Ag/AgCl reference electrode for CaCl 2 based molten salts

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald L. Walsworth
Ronald L. Walsworth University of Maryland, Baltimore
Mark A. Kendrick
Mark A. Kendrick Australian National University
Oi Ling Siu
Oi Ling Siu Lingnan University
Alan D. Lopez
Alan D. Lopez University of Melbourne
Roland Maas
Roland Maas University of Melbourne
Masahiko Honda
Masahiko Honda Australian National University
Janet M. Hergt
Janet M. Hergt University of Melbourne
Christopher J L Murray
Christopher J L Murray University of Washington
Rafael Lozano
Rafael Lozano University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Many students start with flexible programs, such as an accredited affordable online general studies degree, which provides a solid interdisciplinary foundation before specializing.

As professionals progress, they may consider doctoral options that align with environmental policy, education, or social advocacy. Programs like the eds to edd programs offer advanced education degrees aimed at leadership roles in sustainability education and environmental program development.

Social work intersects significantly with community-based environmental initiatives, making a degree such as the cheapest dsw program a relevant choice for those who want to address environmental justice issues on a deeper level.

For individuals seeking a smoother transition into environmental fields, considering the easiest degree to get may provide an accessible path to gaining credentials and entering the workforce quickly, while keeping options open for further study.

Best Scientists Citing David Phillips

Trending Scientists