World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
32
Citations
4617
World Ranking
2664
National Ranking
433

Falconer Mitchell publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Falconer Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 126 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Falconer Mitchell D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Falconer Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Falconer Mitchell is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a focus on several subfields including Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

Their work covers topics that include COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts, Accounting and Organizational Management, Accounting Education and Careers, Management and Organizational Studies, Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy, Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting, and Environmental Sustainability in Business.

Recent publications by Falconer Mitchell include:

  • Evaluating performance management of COVID-19 reality in three European countries: a pragmatic constructivist study, 2021, published in Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
  • Ten things about accountants and accounting that are good!, 2022, published in Journal of Pragmatic Constructivism

Frequent co-authors in Mitchell's research include:

  • Hanne Nørreklit
  • Lino Cinquini
  • Lennart Nørreklit
  • Frederik Koeppe
  • Fabio Magnacca

Mitchell's publications have appeared across various scholarly venues including:

  • Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
  • Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
  • Meditari Accountancy Research
  • Journal of Pragmatic Constructivism

Best Publications

  • Activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results

    John Innes;Falconer Mitchell;Donald Sinclair

  • A survey of activity-based costing in the U.K.'s largest companies

    John Innes;Falconer Mitchell

  • Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting

    Gudrun Baldvinsdottir;Falconer Mitchell;Hanne Nørreklit

  • The process of change in management accounting: some field study evidence

    J. Innes;F. Mitchell

  • Editorial. Problems, challenges and opportunities: the small business as a setting for management accounting research

    Falconer Mitchell;Gavin C. Reid

  • Utilising a typology of management accounting change: An empirical analysis

    Suzana Sulaiman;Falconer Mitchell

  • The development of activity-based costing journal literature, 1987-2000

    Trond Bjørnenak;Falconer Mitchell

  • The rise of the balanced scorecard! Relevance regained?

    Hanne Nørreklit;Lennart Nørreklit;Falconer Mitchell;Trond Bjørnenak

  • Towards a paradigmatic foundation for accounting practice

    Hanne Nørreklit;Lennart Nørreklit;Falconer Mitchell

  • Strategic investment decision making practices: A contextual approach

    Chris Carr;Katja Kolehmainen;Falconer Mitchell

  • Activity-Based Costing: A Review with Case Studies

    John Innes;Falconer Mitchell

  • Research and practice in management accounting: improving integration and communication

    Falconer Mitchell

  • Management accounting and decision making: Two case studies of outsourcing

    Lars Braad Nielsen;Falconer Mitchell;Hanne Nørreklit

  • Activity-Based Costing: Problems in Practice

    Ian Cobb;John Innes;Falconer Mitchell

  • Venture capital supply and accounting information system development

    Falconer Mitchell;Gavin C. Reid;Nicholas G. Terry

  • Pitfalls in using the balanced scorecard

    Hanne Norreklit;Marten Jacobsen;Falconer Mitchell

  • Post Investment Demand for Accounting Information by Venture Capitalists

    Falconer Mitchell;Gavin C. Reid;Nicholas G. Terry

  • Scoring strategic performance: a pragmatic constructivist approach to strategic performance measurement

    Falconer Mitchell;Lars Bråd Nielsen;Hanne Nørreklit;Lennart Nørreklit

  • Theoretical conditions for validity in accounting performance measurement

    Hanne Nørreklit;Lennart Nørreklit;Falconer Mitchell

  • High school accounting and student performance in the first level university accounting course: A UK study

    Falconer Mitchell

  • Accounting and performance measurement : issues in the private and public sectors

    Irvine Lapsley;Falconer Mitchell

Frequent Co-Authors

Irvine Lapsley
Irvine Lapsley University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Business and Management in the USA, a wide range of online college programs provide flexible, accredited options for diverse career ambitions. These programs are especially appealing to working professionals seeking to balance education with job and family commitments.

For those aiming for high-level leadership roles, consider pursuing a PhD in organizational leadership online. This advanced degree opens doors to executive and consulting positions across industries by developing expertise in organizational dynamics and change management.

Specialized business pathways, such as obtaining a construction management degree, are ideal if you envision a career coordinating large-scale building projects. Alternatively, a healthcare management degree online can prepare you for administrative roles within hospitals, clinics, or other medical organizations.

Online and accelerated degrees are increasingly recognized by employers, offering both affordability and the chance to advance quickly in dynamic sectors of the U.S. economy.

Best Scientists Citing Falconer Mitchell

Trending Scientists