World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Massimo Paolucci

Massimo Paolucci

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
20184
World Ranking
6009
National Ranking
84

Massimo Paolucci publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimo Paolucci sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Massimo Paolucci D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Massimo Paolucci sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Massimo Paolucci is affiliated with NTT in Japan and has an extensive publication record in the field of engineering, with a focus on industrial and manufacturing engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields including automotive engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, computer networks and communications, and information systems.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, such as:

  • Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
  • Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Manufacturing Process and Optimization
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management

Massimo Paolucci has frequently published in a range of academic venues, including:

  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • Soft Computing
  • Energies
  • Computers & Operations Research
  • IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • "A bi-objective heuristic approach for green identical parallel machine scheduling" (2020), European Journal of Operational Research
  • "Deep reinforcement learning for multi-objective placement of virtual machines in cloud datacenters" (2020), Soft Computing
  • "Optimal Charging and Routing of Electric Vehicles With Power Constraints and Time-of-Use Energy Prices" (2020), IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology
  • "A matheuristic for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows and a realistic energy consumption model" (2023), Computers & Operations Research
  • "Towards the Integration of Sustainable Transportation and Smart Grids: A Review on Electric Vehicles' Management" (2022), Energies

Frequent collaborators in Paolucci's research include:

  • Roberto Ronco
  • Michela Robba
  • Mauro Gaggero
  • Giulio Ferro
  • R. Minciardi

Best Publications

  • Semantic Matching of Web Services Capabilities

    Massimo Paolucci;Takahiro Kawamura;Terry R. Payne;Katia P. Sycara

  • DAML-S: semantic markup for web services

    Anupriya Ankolekar;Mark Burstein;Jerry R. Hobbs;Ora Lassila

  • DAML-S: Web Service Description for the Semantic Web

    Mark H. Burstein;Jerry R. Hobbs;Ora Lassila;David Martin

  • Bringing semantics to web services: the OWL-S approach

    David Martin;Massimo Paolucci;Sheila McIlraith;Mark Burstein

  • Automated discovery, interaction and composition of Semantic Web services

    Katia P. Sycara;Massimo Paolucci;Anupriya Ankolekar;Naveen Srinivasan

  • Bringing Semantics to Web Services with OWL-S

    David Martin;Mark Burstein;Drew Mcdermott;Sheila Mcilraith

  • An algebraic approach to IP traceback

    Drew Dean;Matt Franklin;Adam Stubblefield

  • Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI

    Massimo Paolucci;Takahiro Kawamura;Takahiro Kawamura;Terry R. Payne;Katia P. Sycara

  • The RETSINA MAS Infrastructure

    Katia Sycara;Massimo Paolucci;Martin Van Velsen;Joseph Giampapa

  • DAML-S: A Semantic Markup Language For Web Services

    Anupriya Ankolenkar;Mark Burstein;Jerry Hobbs;Ora Lassila

  • The Semantic Web - ISWC 2008

    Amit P. Sheth;Steffen Staab;Michael Dean;Massimo Paolucci

  • Energy-aware scheduling for improving manufacturing process sustainability: A mathematical model for flexible flow shops

    A.A.G. Bruzzone;D. Anghinolfi;M. Paolucci;F. Tonelli

  • Authorization and privacy for semantic Web services

    L. Kagal;T. Finin;M. Paolucci;Navcen Srinivasan

  • Perci: Pervasive Service Interaction with the Internet of Things

    G. Broll;E. Rukzio;M. Paolucci;M. Wagner

  • A semantic Web services architecture

    M. Burstein;C. Bussler;T. Finin;M.N. Huhns

  • Security for DAML web services: annotation and matchmaking

    Grit Denker;Lalana Kagal;Tim Finin;Massimo Paolucci

  • Adding OWL-S to UDDI, implementation and throughput

    Naveen Srinivasan;Massimo Paolucci;Katia Sycara

  • Autonomous Semantic Web services

    M. Paolucci;K. Sycara

  • An efficient algorithm for OWL-S based semantic search in UDDI

    Naveen Srinivasan;Massimo Paolucci;Katia Sycara

  • Dynamic discovery and coordination of agent-based semantic Web services

    K. Sycara;M. Paolucci;J. Soudry;Naveen Srinivasan

Frequent Co-Authors

Katia Sycara
Katia Sycara Carnegie Mellon University
Enrico Rukzio
Enrico Rukzio University of Ulm
Terry R. Payne
Terry R. Payne University of Liverpool
Tim Finin
Tim Finin University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Sheila A. McIlraith
Sheila A. McIlraith University of Toronto
Marco Pistore
Marco Pistore Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Gordon S. Blair
Gordon S. Blair Lancaster University
Valérie Issarny
Valérie Issarny French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Onn Shehory
Onn Shehory Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science can lead to diverse online degrees and rewarding careers in STEM fields. Many students now consider options such as an environmental engineering degree online, which combines technology and sustainability for solving real-world challenges. These flexible programs allow students to balance work or other commitments while earning their degree remotely.

Cost is a major consideration. The mechanical engineering cost of education varies widely, but online programs can often offer more affordable pathways than traditional, on-campus degrees. Comparing tuition, fees, and possible financial aid options is crucial for prospective students.

Many wonder, can you get a physics degree online? Advances in digital learning have made this possible, especially for highly theoretical courses, although laboratory requirements may require special arrangements.

For those interested in data-driven careers, the data science learning path is an excellent choice. Online degrees in data science equip graduates with skills highly valued in today’s job market, including programming, analytics, and machine learning.

Best Scientists Citing Massimo Paolucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles