World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Italy
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
12006
World Ranking
3869
National Ranking
78

Marco Pistore publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Pistore sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 182 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marco Pistore D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Pistore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Marco Pistore is affiliated with Fondazione Bruno Kessler in Italy. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with notable contributions in several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Education.

Their work addresses various topics related to digital technology and human interaction, focusing on Educational Games and Gamification, Artificial Intelligence in Games, Digital Games and Media, ICT in Developing Communities, Child Development and Digital Technology, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, and Business Process Modeling and Analysis.

Marco Pistore has published the following recent papers:

  • Automatic generation and recommendation of personalized challenges for gamification, 2020, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • CLIMB: A Pervasive Gameful Platform Promoting Child Independent Mobility, 2020, IEEE Pervasive Computing
  • Semantic modeling and analysis of complex data-aware processes and their executions, 2022, Expert Systems with Applications
  • AI@EDGE: A Secure and Reusable Artificial Intelligence Platform for Edge Computing, 2023, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Responsible AI at the edge: towards privacy-preserving smart cities, 2022, CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Annapaola Marconi
  • Elisabetta Farella
  • Reza Khoshkangini
  • Giuseppe Valetto
  • Michela Ferron

Marco Pistore's research is published in a variety of venues, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their work. These venues include:

  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • IEEE Pervasive Computing
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)

Best Publications

  • NuSMV 2: An OpenSource Tool for Symbolic Model Checking

    Alessandro Cimatti;Edmund M. Clarke;Enrico Giunchiglia;Fausto Giunchiglia

  • Weak, strong, and strong cyclic planning via symbolic model checking

    A. Cimatti;M. Pistore;M. Roveri;P. Traverso

  • Nusmv version 2: an opensource tool for symbolic model checking

    Alessandro Cimatti;Edmund M. Clarke;Enrico Giunchiglia;Fausto Giunchiglia

  • Automated composition of semantic web services into executable processes

    Paolo Traverso;Marco Pistore

  • Run-Time Monitoring of Instances and Classes of Web Service Compositions

    F. Barbon;P. Traverso;M. Pistore;M. Trainotti

  • Specifying and analyzing early requirements in Tropos

    Ariel Fuxman;Lin Liu;John Mylopoulos;Marco Pistore

  • Planning and monitoring Web service composition

    M. Pistore;F. Barbon;P. Bertoli;D. Shaparau

  • Automated composition of web services by planning at the knowledge level

    M. Pistore;A. Marconi;P. Bertoli;P. Traverso

  • Model checking early requirements specifications in Tropos

    A. Fuxman;M. Pistore;J. Mylopoulos;P. Traverso

  • Automated synthesis of composite BPEL4WS Web services

    M. Pistore;P. Traverso;P. Bertoli;A. Marconi

  • Automated composition of web services by planning in asynchronous domains

    M. Pistore;P. Traverso;P. Bertoli

  • Planning with a language for extended goals

    Ugo Dal Lago;Marco Pistore;Paolo Traverso

  • Planning as model checking for extended goals in non-deterministic domains

    Marco Pistore;Paolo Traverso

  • Automated composition of Web services via planning in asynchronous domains

    Piergiorgio Bertoli;Marco Pistore;Paolo Traverso

  • Using gamification to incentivize sustainable urban mobility

    Raman Kazhamiakin;Annapaola Marconi;Mirko Perillo;Marco Pistore

  • A Framework for Proactive Self-adaptation of Service-Based Applications Based on Online Testing

    Julia Hielscher;Raman Kazhamiakin;Andreas Metzger;Marco Pistore

  • The Tropos Methodology

    Paolo Giorgini;Manuel Kolp;John Mylopoulos;Marco Pistore

  • History-Dependent Automata

    Ugo Montanari;Marco Pistore

  • Analysis of communication models in web service compositions

    Raman Kazhamiakin;Marco Pistore;Luca Santuari

  • ASTRO: supporting composition and execution of web services

    Michele Trainotti;Marco Pistore;Gaetano Calabrese;Gabriele Zacco

Frequent Co-Authors

Paolo Traverso
Paolo Traverso Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Alessandro Cimatti
Alessandro Cimatti Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Ugo Montanari
Ugo Montanari University of Pisa
Mike P. Papazoglou
Mike P. Papazoglou Tilburg University
Marco Aiello
Marco Aiello University of Stuttgart
Massimo Paolucci
Massimo Paolucci NTT (Japan)
John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Roberto Sebastiani
Roberto Sebastiani University of Trento
Frank Leymann
Frank Leymann University of Stuttgart
Luciano Baresi
Luciano Baresi Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to various online degrees and career pathways in closely related fields. Many students pursue an online degree for mechanical engineering, which is ideal for those fascinated by design and innovation. These programs blend foundational engineering principles with modern technology, allowing for flexible study options.

Another compelling choice is earning a bachelor of science in physics online. This route is perfect for analytical thinkers interested in the fundamental laws that power computer systems, robotics, and digital devices.

Data continues to drive global innovation, making the data science learning path increasingly popular. These programs teach you how to analyze complex datasets, extract insights, and inform decision-making across multiple industries.

For those wanting to work on the hardware and infrastructure behind today’s computerized systems, an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering is a smart investment. This degree enables graduates to design circuits, power systems, and electronics, often leading to highly sought-after engineering roles.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Pistore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles