World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
16985
World Ranking
7377
National Ranking
190

Paolo Traverso publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Traverso sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 169 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paolo Traverso D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Traverso sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paolo Traverso is affiliated with Fondazione Bruno Kessler in Italy and conducts research primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Medicine. Their work spans a wide range of topics, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence, specifically AI-based problem solving and planning.

The scientist's main subfields of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Research topics explored by Paolo Traverso cover:

  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms

Frequent coauthors include Carlo Terrone, Malik Ghallab, Luciano Serafini, Dana Nau, and Sunandita Patra, highlighting a collaborative network across multiple related AI disciplines.

Publications by Paolo Traverso appear regularly in several prominent venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • European Urology Open Science
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Online Learning of Reusable Abstract Models for Object Goal Navigation," 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • "Deliberative acting, planning and learning with hierarchical operational models," 2021, Artificial Intelligence
  • "Integrating Acting, Planning, and Learning in Hierarchical Operational Models," 2020, Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
  • "Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Metastasis-Directed Therapy Guided by Positron Emission Tomography: Does the Tracer Matter?," 2023, Cancers
  • "On-line Learning of Planning Domains from Sensor Data in PAL: Scaling up to Large State Spaces," 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Paolo Traverso has also contributed to academic books, including the forthcoming "Acting, Planning, and Learning," scheduled for publication by Cambridge University Press in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Automated Planning, Theory And Practice

    Malik Ghallab;Dana S. Nau;Paolo Traverso

  • Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges

    M.P. Papazoglou;P. Traverso;S. Dustdar;F. Leymann

  • Automated Planning: Theory & Practice

    Dana Nau;Malik Ghallab;Paolo Traverso

  • SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING: A RESEARCH ROADMAP

    Michael P. Papazoglou;Paolo Traverso;Schahram Dustdar;Frank Leymann

  • Weak, strong, and strong cyclic planning via symbolic model checking

    A. Cimatti;M. Pistore;M. Roveri;P. Traverso

  • Automated composition of semantic web services into executable processes

    Paolo Traverso;Marco Pistore

  • Automated Planning and Acting

    Malik Ghallab;Dana Nau;Paolo Traverso

  • Run-Time Monitoring of Instances and Classes of Web Service Compositions

    F. Barbon;P. Traverso;M. Pistore;M. Trainotti

  • Specifying and analyzing early requirements in Tropos

    Ariel Fuxman;Lin Liu;John Mylopoulos;Marco Pistore

  • Planning and monitoring Web service composition

    M. Pistore;F. Barbon;P. Bertoli;D. Shaparau

  • Service-Oriented Computing Research Roadmap

    Michael P. Papazoglou;Paolo Traverso;Schahram Dustdar;Frank Leymann

  • Planning as Model Checking

    Fausto Giunchiglia;Paolo Traverso

  • Automated composition of web services by planning at the knowledge level

    M. Pistore;A. Marconi;P. Bertoli;P. Traverso

  • Planning in nondeterministic domains under partial observability via symbolic model checking

    Piergiorgio Bertoli;Alessandro Cimatti;Marco Roveri;Paolo Traverso

  • Model checking early requirements specifications in Tropos

    A. Fuxman;M. Pistore;J. Mylopoulos;P. Traverso

  • Automated synthesis of composite BPEL4WS Web services

    M. Pistore;P. Traverso;P. Bertoli;A. Marconi

  • Automated composition of web services by planning in asynchronous domains

    M. Pistore;P. Traverso;P. Bertoli

  • Enabling Distributed Knowledge Management: Managerial and Technological Implications

    Matteo Bonifacio;Paolo Bouquet;Paolo Traverso

  • Web service composition as planning

    Mark Carman;Jose Luis Ambite;Luciano Serafini;Craig Knoblock

  • Planning via Model Checking: A Decision Procedure for AR

    Alessandro Cimatti;Fausto Giunchiglia;Enrico Giunchiglia;Paolo Traverso

Frequent Co-Authors

Dana S. Nau
Dana S. Nau University of Maryland, College Park
Marco Pistore
Marco Pistore Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Alessandro Cimatti
Alessandro Cimatti Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Fausto Giunchiglia
Fausto Giunchiglia University of Trento
Mike P. Papazoglou
Mike P. Papazoglou Tilburg University
Enrico Giunchiglia
Enrico Giunchiglia University of Genoa
Frank Leymann
Frank Leymann University of Stuttgart
Luciano Serafini
Luciano Serafini Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Martin Wirsing
Martin Wirsing Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up diverse career options for those interested in computer science and related fields. Today, you can earn a 2-year computer science degree online, allowing you to fast-track your entry into the tech industry. Accelerated programs are ideal for motivated learners who want to quickly gain fundamental programming and software development skills.

If you're passionate about sustainability, consider an environmental engineering online degree. This path combines engineering skills with ecological awareness, preparing graduates to solve crucial environmental challenges.

Engineering enthusiasts can also benefit from online mechanical engineering degrees. These programs emphasize design, mechanics, and problem-solving, opening opportunities in manufacturing, robotics, and aerospace.

For those fascinated by the principles of nature, pursuing an online theoretical physics degree can pave the way to research and innovation roles in technology, academia, or industry.

Choosing an online degree lets you balance your studies with work or other commitments, while still accessing top-tier education and broadening your future career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Traverso

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles