World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amanda B. Diekman

Amanda B. Diekman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7709 7193 4130 3752 102 13484

Amanda B. Diekman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda B. Diekman between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda B. Diekman published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2018. 18 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2018. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 10 publications
1999 2025

123 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda B. Diekman: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 4
2005 2
2006 2
2007 6
2008 5
2009 1
2010 5
2011 5
2012 1
2013 5
2014 0
2015 7
2016 5
2017 8
2018 10
2019 3
2020 4
2021 10
2022 9
2023 6
2024 8
2025 10
Total 123
Download as CSV

Amanda B. Diekman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda B. Diekman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 102
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda B. Diekman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda B. Diekman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda B. Diekman is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the social sciences and psychology. Their work spans various subfields, including sociology and political science, gender studies, safety research, social psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their research covers multiple key topics, highlighted by publications examining career development and diversity, social and intergroup psychology, misinformation and its impacts, gender diversity and inequality, climate change communication and perception, gender roles and identity studies, as well as mentoring and academic development.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Amanda B. Diekman include:

  • "Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science" (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive" (2022, Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  • "The psychological and political correlates of conspiracy theory beliefs" (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • "Putting Belonging in Context: Communal Affordances Signal Belonging in STEM" (2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
  • "On modeling the correlates of conspiracy thinking" (2023, Scientific Reports)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Amanda B. Diekman include:

  • Tessa Benson-Greenwald
  • Mansi Joshi
  • Joseph E. Uscinski
  • Casey Klofstad
  • Daniel Verdear

The venues where Amanda B. Diekman most frequently publishes their work are:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Scientific Reports
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Motivation Science
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

This body of work reflects a sustained engagement with themes revolving around psychological and social dynamics, particularly as they pertain to diversity, inclusion, and interdisciplinary intersections in both academic and social contexts.

Best Publications

  • Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal.

    Alice H. Eagly;Wendy Wood;Amanda B. Diekman

  • Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future

    Amanda B. Diekman;Alice H. Eagly

  • Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles A New Look at Why Women Opt Out of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers

    Amanda B. Diekman;Elizabeth R. Brown;Amanda M. Johnston;Emily K. Clark

  • Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: evidence for a goal congruity perspective.

    Amanda B. Diekman;Emily K. Clark;Amanda M. Johnston;Elizabeth R. Brown

  • What is the Problem? Prejudice as an Attitude-in-Context

    Alice H. Eagly;Amanda B. Diekman

  • Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: a social psychological analysis.

    Alice H. Eagly;Amanda B. Diekman;Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt;Anne M. Koenig

  • ROLLING WITH THE CHANGES: A ROLE CONGRUITY PERSPECTIVE ON GENDER NORMS

    Amanda B. Diekman;Wind Goodfriend

  • A Goal Congruity Model of Role Entry, Engagement, and Exit: Understanding Communal Goal Processes in STEM Gender Gaps

    Amanda B. Diekman;Mia Steinberg;Elizabeth R. Brown;Aimee L. Belanger

  • Power, Conflict, and Community: How Gendered Views of Political Power Influence Women's Political Ambition

    Monica C. Schneider;Mirya R. Holman;Amanda B. Diekman;Thomas McAndrew

  • Learning to Be Little Women and Little Men: The Inequitable Gender Equality of Nonsexist Children's Literature

    Amanda B. Diekman;Sarah K. Murnen

  • Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies

    Amanda B. Diekman;Wind Goodfriend;Stephanie Goodwin

  • New Routes to Recruiting and Retaining Women in STEM: Policy Implications of a Communal Goal Congruity Perspective

    Amanda B. Diekman;Erica S. Weisgram;Aimee L. Belanger

  • On Motivated Role Selection: Gender Beliefs, Distant Goals, and Career Interest:

    Clifford D. Evans;Amanda B. Diekman

  • Dynamic Stereotypes about Women and Men in Latin America and the United States

    Amanda B. Diekman;Alice H. Eagly;Antonio Mladinic;Maria Cristina Ferreira

  • A SOCIAL ROLE THEORY PERSPECTIVE ON GENDER GAPS IN POLITICAL ATTITUDES

    Amanda B. Diekman;Monica C. Schneider

  • Navigating Social Roles in Pursuit of Important Goals: A Communal Goal Congruity Account of STEM Pursuits

    Amanda B. Diekman;Mia Steinberg

  • Accuracy and Bias in Stereotypes about the Social and Political Attitudes of Women and Men

    Amanda B Diekman;Alice H Eagly;Patrick Kulesa

  • Can I Work with and Help Others in This Field? How Communal Goals Influence Interest and Participation in STEM Fields.

    Kathryn L. Boucher;Melissa A. Fuesting;Amanda B. Diekman;Mary C. Murphy

  • A Change Will Do Us Good: Threats Diminish Typical Preferences for Male Leaders

    Elizabeth R. Brown;Amanda B. Diekman;Monica C. Schneider

  • LOVE MEANS NEVER HAVING TO BE CAREFUL: The Relationship Between Reading Romance Novels and Safe Sex Behavior

    Amanda B. Diekman;Mary McDonald;Wendi L. Gardner

Frequent Co-Authors

Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University
Sabine Sczesny
Sabine Sczesny University of Bern
Jessi L. Smith
Jessi L. Smith University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Nilanjana Dasgupta
Nilanjana Dasgupta University of Massachusetts Amherst
Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sapna Cheryan
Sapna Cheryan University of Washington
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin Skidmore College
Sarah K. Murnen
Sarah K. Murnen Kenyon College
Wendy Wood
Wendy Wood University of Southern California
Wendi L. Gardner
Wendi L. Gardner Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to many rewarding careers, with mental health counseling being a popular choice. Aspiring professionals often choose online psychology degrees as a flexible way to gain the foundational knowledge required for these roles.

It's important to understand that each state has distinct qualifications and expectations for counselors. For example, those interested in working on the West Coast can explore the mental health counselor requirements in Sacramento or discover the specific mental health counselor requirements in San Diego. Both cities require candidates to complete a master’s degree, supervised clinical experience, and pass a licensure exam.

If you are more interested in opportunities elsewhere, be sure to research how to become a mental health counselor in Saint Paul, where local guidelines and practical training may differ. Similarly, the San Antonio mental health counselor education requirements emphasize state-regulated academic and clinical training.

Exploring these different pathways can help you make informed decisions about your education and career goals in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda B. Diekman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles