World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
6310
World Ranking
5608
National Ranking
449

Katherine E. Moseby publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine E. Moseby sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 165 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Katherine E. Moseby D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Katherine E. Moseby sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Katherine E. Moseby is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science, particularly focusing on ecology and conservation. Their research encompasses a variety of subfields and topics related to wildlife ecology, behavior, and ecosystem management.

Moseby's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

With a strong specialization in subfields such as:

  • Ecology
  • Genetics
  • Ecological Modeling
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

The central topics across their publications focus on:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Ecology and biodiversity studies

Moseby's research has been published in a number of frequently appearing venues, including:

  • Austral Ecology
  • Wildlife Research
  • Australian Mammalogy
  • Animal Conservation
  • Global Ecology and Conservation

Recent significant publications authored or co-authored by Moseby are:

  • "Factors affecting success of conservation translocations of terrestrial vertebrates: A global systematic review" (2021, Global Ecology and Conservation)
  • "Effectiveness of the Felixer grooming trap for the control of feral cats: a field trial in arid South Australia" (2020, Wildlife Research)
  • "Strategic adaptive management planning-Restoring a desert ecosystem by managing introduced species and native herbivores and reintroducing mammals" (2020, Conservation Science and Practice)
  • "A comprehensive review of mammalian carnivore translocations" (2022, Mammal Review)
  • "Exposure to a novel predator induces visual predator recognition by naïve prey" (2020, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology)

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • John Read
  • Hugh McGregor
  • Katherine Tuft
  • Rebecca West
  • Robert Brandle

Best Publications

  • Recommended guiding principles for reporting on camera trapping research

    P. D. Meek;G. Ballard;A. Claridge;A. Claridge;R. Kays;R. Kays

  • Predation determines the outcome of 10 reintroduction attempts in arid South Australia

    K.E. Moseby;J.L. Read;D.C. Paton;P. Copley

  • Enumerating a continental-scale threat: How many feral cats are in Australia?

    S. Legge;B. P. Murphy;Hugh McGregor;John Woinarski

  • Havens for threatened Australian mammals: the contributions of fenced areas and offshore islands to the protection of mammal species susceptible to introduced predators

    Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;John C. Z. Woinarski;Andrew A. Burbidge;Russell Palmer

  • The efficacy of feral cat, fox and rabbit exclusion fence designs for threatened species protection.

    K.E. Moseby;J.L. Read

  • Arid Recovery - A comparison of reptile and small mammal populations inside and outside a large rabbit, cat and fox-proof exclosure in arid South Australia

    Katherine Elizabeth Moseby;Brydie May Hill;John Llewellyn Read

  • Factors affecting success of conservation translocations of terrestrial vertebrates: A global systematic review

    Shane D. Morris;Barry W. Brook;Katherine E. Moseby;Christopher N. Johnson

  • Catastrophic cat predation: A call for predator profiling in wildlife protection programs

    K.E. Moseby;D.E. Peacock;J.L. Read

  • Reintroduction of the greater bilby, Macrotis lagotis (Reid) (Marsupialia : Thylacomyidae), to northern South Australia: survival, ecology and notes on reintroduction protocols

    K. E. Moseby;E. O'Donnell

  • Interactions between a Top Order Predator and Exotic Mesopredators in the Australian Rangelands

    Katherine E. Moseby;Heather Neilly;John L. Read;Helen A. Crisp

  • Rabbit biocontrol and landscape-scale recovery of threatened desert mammals.

    Reece D. Pedler;Robert Brandle;John L. Read;Richard Southgate

  • Can predator avoidance training improve reintroduction outcomes for the greater bilby in arid Australia

    Katherine E. Moseby;Amber Cameron;Helen A. Crisp

  • Movement patterns of feral predators in an arid environment – implications for control through poison baiting

    K. E. Moseby;J. Stott;H. Crisp

  • Introduced cats (Felis catus) eating a continental fauna: the number of mammals killed in Australia

    Brett P Murphy;Leigh-Ann Woolley;Hayley M Geyle;Sarah M Legge

  • Predator exposure improves anti‐predator responses in a threatened mammal

    Rebecca West;Mike Letnic;Daniel T. Blumstein;Katherine E. Moseby

  • The success of GPS collar deployments on mammals in Australia

    Alison Matthews;Laura Ruykys;Bill Ellis;Sean FitzGibbon

  • Resolving the value of the dingo in ecological restoration

    Thomas M. Newsome;Thomas M. Newsome;Guy Anthony Ballard;Guy Anthony Ballard;Mathew S. Crowther;Justin A. Dellinger

  • Tailoring release protocols to individual species and sites: one size does not fit all.

    Katherine E. Moseby;Brydie M. Hill;Tyrone H. Lavery

  • The role of refuges in the persistence of Australian dryland mammals.

    Chris R. Pavey;Jane Addison;Rob Brandle;Chris R. Dickman

  • Degrees of population-level susceptibility of Australian terrestrial non-volant mammal species to predation by the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cat (Felis catus)

    James Q. Radford;John C. Z. Woinarski;Sarah Legge;Sarah Legge;Marcus Baseler

  • Harnessing natural selection to tackle the problem of prey naïveté

    Katherine E. Moseby;Daniel T. Blumstein;Mike Letnic

Frequent Co-Authors

Mike Letnic
Mike Letnic University of New South Wales
Sarah Legge
Sarah Legge Australian National University
Daniel T. Blumstein
Daniel T. Blumstein University of California, Los Angeles
Christopher N. Johnson
Christopher N. Johnson University of Tasmania
Peter J. S. Fleming
Peter J. S. Fleming University of Southern Queensland
Chris R. Dickman
Chris R. Dickman University of Sydney
David C. Paton
David C. Paton University of Adelaide
Matt W. Hayward
Matt W. Hayward University of Newcastle Australia
John C. Z. Woinarski
John C. Z. Woinarski Charles Darwin University
Thomas M. Newsome
Thomas M. Newsome University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a career in Ecology and Evolution, a broad range of online degrees can complement your expertise and enhance career options. Students interested in creative methods to communicate scientific findings might explore an online graphic design degree, which provides the skills to design impactful materials for research and public outreach.

Those seeking flexibility may be drawn to best value online interdisciplinary studies degrees, which allow you to integrate biology, environmental studies, and even policy courses to fit diverse career interests in ecology.

For students aiming to deepen their perspective on environmental change, consider the best online history masters. Understanding historical contexts enriches your knowledge of ecological shifts and human impact over time.

Finally, careers in data management, research libraries, or scientific literature require specialized training. Earning a library science degree prepares you for roles managing vital information resources in environmental research and education settings.

Best Scientists Citing Katherine E. Moseby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles