World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4003 3691 2245 2022 162 14274

Valerie A. Earnshaw publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Valerie A. Earnshaw between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Valerie A. Earnshaw published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 45 of the 238 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 19 publications
2008 2025

238 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Valerie A. Earnshaw: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 2
2010 0
2011 3
2012 8
2013 13
2014 9
2015 14
2016 16
2017 9
2018 13
2019 19
2020 19
2021 30
2022 20
2023 17
2024 26
2025 19
Total 238
Download as CSV

Valerie A. Earnshaw publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valerie A. Earnshaw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 162
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Valerie A. Earnshaw D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valerie A. Earnshaw sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Valerie A. Earnshaw is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States and has a significant body of research primarily focused on health, psychology, and medicine. Their work spans several interdisciplinary fields, emphasizing issues related to stigmatization, infectious diseases, and public health behavior.

Their recent publications include:

  • COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support, 2020, published in Translational Behavioral Medicine
  • Stigma and substance use disorders: A clinical, research, and advocacy agenda., 2020, published in American Psychologist
  • The intersection of gender and drug use-related stigma: A mixed methods systematic review and synthesis of the literature, 2021, published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
  • Integrating time into stigma and health research, 2022, published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Anticipated stigma, stereotypes, and COVID-19 testing., 2020, published in Stigma and Health

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Earnshaw include:

  • Lisa A. Eaton
  • Natalie M. Brousseau
  • Ryan J. Watson
  • Frederick L. Altice
  • Elizabeth Hill

Earnshaw publishes regularly in several venues, with notable frequency in:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Stigma and Health
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • UNC Libraries
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine

Their research fields of study cover a variety of medical and psychological disciplines, including:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Health Professions

In subfields, their work is particularly concentrated in:

  • General Health Professions
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Social Psychology
  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Psychology

Main topics addressed throughout their research include:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Best Publications

  • The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: a global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas

    Anne L. Stangl;Valerie A. Earnshaw;Carmen H. Logie;Wim van Brakel

  • From Conceptualizing to Measuring HIV Stigma: A Review of HIV Stigma Mechanism Measures

    Valerie A. Earnshaw;Stephenie R. Chaudoir

  • Stigma and racial/ethnic HIV disparities: Moving toward resilience.

    Valerie A. Earnshaw;Laura M. Bogart;John F. Dovidio;David R. Williams

  • HIV Stigma Mechanisms and Well-Being Among PLWH: A Test of the HIV Stigma Framework

    Valerie A. Earnshaw;Laramie R. Smith;Stephenie R. Chaudoir;Stephenie R. Chaudoir;K. Rivet Amico

  • The impact of stigma in healthcare on people living with chronic illnesses.

    Valerie A. Earnshaw;Diane M. Quinn

  • Conceptualizing and Measuring Mental Illness Stigma: The Mental Illness Stigma Framework and Critical Review of Measures.

    Annie B. Fox;Valerie A. Earnshaw;Emily C. Taverna;Dawne Vogt;Dawne Vogt

  • COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support.

    Valerie A Earnshaw;Lisa A Eaton;Seth C Kalichman;Natalie M Brousseau

  • Concealable Stigmatized Identities and Psychological Well-Being.

    Diane M. Quinn;Valerie A. Earnshaw

  • Drug Addiction Stigma in the Context of Methadone Maintenance Therapy: An Investigation into Understudied Sources of Stigma

    Valerie Earnshaw;Laramie Smith;Michael Copenhaver

  • The impact of patient race on clinical decisions related to prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): assumptions about sexual risk compensation and implications for access.

    Sarah K. Calabrese;Valerie A. Earnshaw;Kristen Underhill;Nathan B. Hansen;Nathan B. Hansen

  • Examining effects of anticipated stigma, centrality, salience, internalization, and outness on psychological distress for people with concealable stigmatized identities.

    Diane M. Quinn;Michelle K. Williams;Francisco Quintana;Jennifer L. Gaskins

  • HIV Stigma and Physical Health Symptoms: Do Social Support, Adaptive Coping, and/or Identity Centrality Act as Resilience Resources?

    Valerie A. Earnshaw;Shawn M. Lang;Margaret Lippitt;Harry Jin

  • "Discredited" Versus "Discreditable": Understanding How Shared and Unique Stigma Mechanisms Affect Psychological and Physical Health Disparities.

    Stephenie R. Chaudoir;Valerie A. Earnshaw;Stephanie Andel

  • Stigma-Based Bullying Interventions: A Systematic Review.

    Valerie A. Earnshaw;Sari L. Reisner;David D. Menino;V. Paul Poteat

  • Understanding Concealable Stigmatized Identities: The Role of Identity in Psychological, Physical, and Behavioral Outcomes

    Diane M. Quinn;Valerie A. Earnshaw

  • Substance use stigma: Reliability and validity of a theory-based scale for substance-using populations.

    Laramie R. Smith;Valerie A. Earnshaw;Michael M. Copenhaver;Chinazo O. Cunningham

  • Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prenatal Care: Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents in New York City Health Centers.

    Jeannette R Ickovics;Valerie Earnshaw;Jessica B. Lewis;Trace S. Kershaw

  • Stigma and substance use disorders: A clinical, research, and advocacy agenda.

    Valerie A Earnshaw

  • Anticipated stigma and quality of life among people living with chronic illnesses

    Valerie A Earnshaw;Diane M Quinn;Crystal L Park

  • Internalized stigma and HIV status disclosure among HIV-positive black men who have sex with men.

    Nicole M. Overstreet;Valerie A. Earnshaw;Seth C. Kalichman;Diane M. Quinn

  • Intersectionality of internalized HIV stigma and internalized substance use stigma: Implications for depressive symptoms:

    Valerie A Earnshaw;Laramie R Smith;Chinazo O Cunningham;Michael M Copenhaver

  • The importance of full-time work for urban adults’ mental and physical health

    Lisa Rosenthal;Amy Carroll-Scott;Valerie A. Earnshaw;Alycia Santilli

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeannette R. Ickovics
Jeannette R. Ickovics Yale University
Laura M. Bogart
Laura M. Bogart RAND Corporation
Diane M. Quinn
Diane M. Quinn University of Connecticut
Seth C. Kalichman
Seth C. Kalichman University of Connecticut
Lisa A. Eaton
Lisa A. Eaton University of Connecticut
Trace Kershaw
Trace Kershaw Yale University
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Mark A. Schuster
Mark A. Schuster Kaiser Permanente
Ryan J. Watson
Ryan J. Watson University of Connecticut
Nathan B. Hansen
Nathan B. Hansen University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology in the USA opens up multiple online degree options and flexible career pathways. Many students pursue online bachelor’s or master’s programs to jump-start their careers in counseling, clinical psychology, or related fields. These online degrees can offer accelerated curricula and flexible schedules, making it easier for students to balance work, study, and personal commitments.

If you’re interested in becoming a counselor, the process to enter this field varies by state. Each state has specific educational and licensing requirements for prospective counselors. For instance, you can learn more about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in California or discover the fastest way to become a counselor in Colorado. Similarly, you may want to explore the fastest way to become a counselor in Connecticut and the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Delaware.

Overall, online degrees provide a flexible foundation for psychology-related careers, while state-specific guidance ensures you meet all requirements for licensing and practice.

Best Scientists Citing Valerie A. Earnshaw

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles