World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Laurent J. Bouyer

Laurent J. Bouyer

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
4682
World Ranking
8631
National Ranking
504

Laurent J. Bouyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurent J. Bouyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 152 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Laurent J. Bouyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurent J. Bouyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurent J. Bouyer is affiliated with Université Laval in Canada. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with a significant focus on Biomedical Engineering. Their scholarly output includes contributions to subfields such as Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's research topics cover several areas including muscle activation and electromyography studies, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, balance, gait, and falls prevention, ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders, as well as botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders.

Recent scholarly publications highlight various dimensions of rehabilitation and sensor technologies. Some of their recent papers include:

  • Effects of robotic gait training after stroke: A meta-analysis, 2020, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • Reducing Noise, Artifacts and Interference in Single-Channel EMG Signals: A Review, 2023, Sensors
  • The effect of experimental pain on the excitability of the corticospinal tract in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, European Journal of Pain
  • Clinicians' perspectives on inertial measurement units in clinical practice, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Validating Commercial Wearable Sensors for Running Gait Parameters Estimation, 2020, IEEE Sensors Journal

Bouyer frequently publishes in several academic venues, with multiple publications in:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Sensors
  • IEEE Sensors Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Their collaborative network includes recurrent co-authors such as Jean-Sébastien Roy, Catherine Mercier, Alexandre Campeau-Lecours, François Routhier, and Antoine Frasie, each having contributed to multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Contribution of Cutaneous Inputs From the Hindpaw to the Control of Locomotion. I. Intact Cats

    Laurent J. Bouyer;Serge Rossignol

  • Effects of robotic gait training after stroke: A meta-analysis.

    Geoffroy Moucheboeuf;Romain Griffier;David Gasq;Bertrand Glize

  • Is combining gait retraining or an exercise programme with education better than education alone in treating runners with patellofemoral pain?A randomised clinical trial.

    Jean-Francois Esculier;Laurent Julien Bouyer;Blaise Dubois;Pierre Fremont

  • Pharmacological Activation and Modulation of the Central Pattern Generator for Locomotion in the Cata

    S. Rossignol;C. Chau;E. Brustein;N. Giroux

  • Reducing Noise, Artifacts and Interference in Single-Channel EMG Signals: A Review

    Unknown

  • Involvement of the corticospinal tract in the control of human gait

    Dorothy Barthélemy;Michael James Grey;Jens Bo Nielsen;Laurent Bouyer

  • Recovery of locomotion in the cat following spinal cord lesions.

    S Rossignol;L Bouyer;D Barthélemy;C Langlet

  • Alterations in central motor representation increase over time in individuals with rotator cuff tendinopathy.

    Suzy Ngomo;Catherine Mercier;Laurent J. Bouyer;Alexandre Savoie

  • Lower limb control and strength in runners with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome.

    Jean-Francois Esculier;Jean-Sébastien Roy;Laurent Julien Bouyer

  • Plasticity of locomotor sensorimotor interactions after peripheral and/or spinal lesions.

    Serge Rossignol;Grégory Barrière;Alain Frigon;Dorothy Barthélemy

  • Adaptive Locomotor Plasticity in Chronic Spinal Cats after Ankle Extensors Neurectomy

    Laurent J. G. Bouyer;Patrick J. Whelan;Keir G. Pearson;Serge Rossignol

  • An ElectroHydraulic Actuated Ankle Foot Orthosis to Generate Force Fields and to Test Proprioceptive Reflexes During Human Walking

    M. Noel;B. Cantin;S. Lambert;C.M. Gosselin

  • Tonic pain experienced during locomotor training impairs retention despite normal performance during acquisition.

    Jason Bouffard;Laurent J. Bouyer;Jean-Sébastien Roy;Catherine Mercier

  • Timing-Specific Transfer of Adapted Muscle Activity After Walking in an Elastic Force Field

    Andreanne Blanchette;Laurent J. Bouyer

  • The effect of experimental pain on the excitability of the corticospinal tract in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Antoine Rohel;Jason Bouffard;Philippe Patricio;Nicolas Mavromatis

  • Validity of Wearable Sensors at the Shoulder Joint: Combining Wireless Electromyography Sensors and Inertial Measurement Units to Perform Physical Workplace Assessments.

    Isabelle Poitras;Mathieu Bielmann;Alexandre Campeau-Lecours;Catherine Mercier

  • Physiology of walking in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Nicole Marquis;Richard Debigaré;Laurent Bouyer;Didier Saey

  • Psychometric evidence of self-reported questionnaires for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review

    Jean-Francois Esculier;Jean-Sébastien Roy;Laurent Julien Bouyer

  • Chapter 12 The cat model of spinal injury

    Rossignol S;Chau C;Giroux N;Brustein E

  • A Virtual Reality avatar interaction (VRai) platform to assess residual executive dysfunction in active military personnel with previous mild traumatic brain injury: proof of concept

    Nicolas Robitaille;Philip L. Jackson;Luc J. Hébert;Catherine Mercier

  • Determinants of locomotor recovery after spinal injury in the cat

    Serge Rossignol;Laurent Bouyer;Cécile Langlet;Dorothy Barthélemy

  • The Spinal Cat

    Serge Rossignol;Marc Bélanger;Connie Chau;Nathalie Giroux

Frequent Co-Authors

Serge Rossignol
Serge Rossignol University of Montreal
Jens Nielsen
Jens Nielsen Chalmers University of Technology
Philip L. Jackson
Philip L. Jackson Université Laval
Clément Gosselin
Clément Gosselin Université Laval
François Maltais
François Maltais Université Laval
Tomás A. Reader
Tomás A. Reader University of Montreal
Younes Messaddeq
Younes Messaddeq Université Laval
Alain Frigon
Alain Frigon Université de Sherbrooke
Jean-René Cazalets
Jean-René Cazalets University of Bordeaux
Trevor Drew
Trevor Drew University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, a variety of related online degrees can help you build a strong foundation or prepare for specialized roles in mental health, research, or therapy. Expanding your education offers more flexibility and opens up new career pathways in the broader behavioral sciences.

If you're seeking a program with a scientific and human behavior focus, an online psychology degree is a popular entry point. These degrees offer insights into cognition, emotion, and behavior—key areas supporting neuroscience studies.

Careers in social work often intersect with neuroscience, especially in mental health services. MSW online programs blend practical training with foundational knowledge, ideal for those aiming to support clients with neurological or psychological challenges.

For advanced clinical roles, the shortest online psyd programs train you for direct practice in mental healthcare, while online lmft program options focus on family systems and relationship-based therapeutics. Both paths can enhance your ability to support clients with neurological conditions or behavioral health concerns.

Best Scientists Citing Laurent J. Bouyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles